Developmental potential of selectively enucleated immature mouse oocytes upon nuclear transfer

Molecular Reproduction and Development

Volumn 75, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1269-1280

  Mohammed, A A ^a,b   Karasiewicz, J ^a   Modlinski J A ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND ANIMAL BREEDING   (Poland)

^b Assiut University   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Enucleolation; Immature (GV) oocytes; Mouse; Nuclear transfer; Selective enucleation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; BLASTOMERE; C57BL 10 MOUSE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIVISION; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; CUMULUS OOPHORUS; CYTOPLASM; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FETUS; FIBROBLAST; GERMINAL VESICLE; MALE; MORULA; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; OOCYTE MATURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES CONCERNING CELLS; PRONUCLEUS; SELECTIVE ENUCLEATION; SOMATIC CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; LINEAR MODELS; MICE; MICROMANIPULATION; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; OOCYTES;

EID: 42349116886     PISSN: 1040452X     EISSN: 10982795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20870     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Brunei S, Pahlavan G, Taylor S, Maro B. 2003. Functionality of the spindle checkpoint during the first meiotic division of mammalian oocytes. Reproduction 126:443-450.
2. Chang CC, Nagy ZP, Abdelmassih R, Yang X, Tian XC. 2004. Nuclear and microtubule dynamics of G2/M somatic nuclei during haploidization in germinal vesicle-stage mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 70:752-758.
3. Chang HC, Liu H, Zhang J, Grifo J, Krey LC. 2005. Developmental incompetency of denuded mouse oocytes undergoing maturation in vitro is ooplasmic in nature and is associated with aberrant Oct-4 expression. Human Reprod 20:1958-1968.
4. Cheng Y, Fan HY, Wen DC, Tong C, Zhu ZY, Lei L, Sun QY, Chen DY. 2003. Asynchronous cytoplast and karyoplast transplantation reveals that the cytoplasm determines the developmental fate of the nucleus in mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 65:278-282.
5. Choi T, Fukasawa K, Zhou R, Tessarollo L, Borror K, Resau J, Vande Woude GF. 1996. The Mos/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway regulates the size and degradation of the first polar body in maturing mouse oocytes. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 93:7032-7035.
6. Cuthbertson KRS. 1983. Parthenogenetic activation of mouse oocytes in vitro with ethanol and benzyl alcohol. J Exp Zool 226:311-314.
7. De Sousa PA, Watson AJ, Schultz GA, Bilodeau-Goeseels S. 1998. Oogenetic and zygotic gene expression directing early bovine embryogenesis: A review. Mol Reprod Dev 51:112-121.
8. Eppig JJ. 2001. Oocyte control of ovarian follicular development and function in mammals. Reproduction 122:829-838.
9. Fulka J, Jr., Moor RM, Fulka J. 1995. Mouse oocyte maturation: Meiotic checkpoints. Exp Cell Res 219:414-419.
10. Fulka J, Jr., Moor RM, Loi P, Fulka J. 2003. Enucleolation of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 59:1879-1885.
11. Fulka H, Mrazek M, Fulka J, Jr. 2004. Nucleolar dysfunction may be associated with infertility in humans. Fertil Steril 82:486-487.
12. Gao S, Gasparrini B, McGarry M, Ferrier T, Fletcher J, Harkness L, De Sousa P, Wilmut I. 2002. Germinal vesicle material is essential for nucleus remodeling after nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 67:928-934.
13. Geuskens M, Alexandre H. 1984. Ultrastructural and autoradiographic studies of nucleolar development and rDNA transcription in preimplantation mouse embryos. Cell Diff 14:125-134.
14. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Fortini D, Grieco N. 2003. Pronuclear morphology and chromosomal abnormalities as scoring criteria for embryo selection. Fertil Steril 80:341-349.
15. Gordon JW, Talansky BE. 1986. Assisted fertilization by zona drilling: A mouse model for correction of oligospermia. J Exp Zool 239:347-354.
16. Grabarek JB, Plusa B, Modlinski JA, Karasiewicz J. 2004. Reconstruction of enucleated mouse germinal vesicle oocytes with blastomere nuclei. Zygote 12:163-172.
17. Grȩda P, Karasiewicz J, Modliński JA. 2006. Mouse zygotes as recipients in embryo cloning. Reproduction 132:741-748.
18. Hyttel P, Laurincik J, Rosenkranz Ch, Rath D, Niemann H, Ochs RL, Schellander K. 2000. Nucleolar proteins and ultrastructure in preimplantation porcine embryos developed in vivo. Biol Reprod 63:1848-1856.
19. Kitajima TS, Kawashima SA, Watanabe Y. 2004. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature 427:510-517.
20. Leung AKL, Lamond AI. 2003. The dynamics of the nucleolus. Crit Rev Eukar Gene Exp 13:39-54.
21. Liu H, Wang CW, Grifo JA, Krey LC, Zhang J. 1999. Reconstruction of mouse oocytes by germinal vesicle transfer: Maturity of host oocyte cytoplasm determines meiosis. Human Reprod 14:2357-2361.
22. Liu H, Zhang J, Krey LC, Grifo JA. 2000a. In-vitro development of mouse zygotes following reconstruction by sequential transfer of germinal vesicles and haploid pronuclei. Human Reprod 15:1997-2002.
23. Liu J, Van Der Elst J, Van Den Broecke R, Dumortier F, Dhont M. 2000b. Maturation of mouse primordial follicles by combination of grafting and in vitro culture. Biol Reprod 62:1218-1223.
24. Maro B, Verlhac MH. 2002. Polar body formation: New rules for asymmetric divisions. Nat Cell Biol 4:281-283.
25. Matzuk MM, Burns KH, Viveiros MM, Eppig JJ. 2002. Intercellular communication in the mammalian ovary: Oocytes carry the conversation. Science 296:2178-2180.
26. Mintz B. 1962. Experimental study of the developing mammalian egg: Removal of the zona pellucida. Science 138:594-595.
27. Modliński JA. 1975. Haploid mouse embryos obtained by microsurgical removal of one pronucleus. J Embryol Exp Morph 33:333-349.
28. Nan C-L, Ouyang Y-C, Zhao Z-J, Jiang Y, Lei Z-L, Huang J-C, Song X-F, Sun Q-Y, Chen D-Y. 2007. Time course of meiotic progression after transferring primary spermatocyte into ooplasm at different stages. Mol Reprod Dev 74:1072-1080.
29. Ogushi S, Fulka J, Jr., Miyano T. 2005. Germinal vesicle materials are requisite for male pronucleus formation but not for change in the activities of CDK1 and MAP kinase during maturation and fertilization of pig oocytes. Dev Biol 286:287-298.
30. Olson M, Dundr M, Szebeni A. 2000. The nucleolus: An old factory with unexpected capabilities. Trends Cell Biol 10:189-196.
31. Olson M, Hingorani K, Szebeni A. 2003. Conventional and nonconventional roles of the nucleolus. Int Rev Cyt 219:199-266.
32. Petronczki M, Siomos MF, Nasmyth K. 2003. Un menage a quatre: The molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell 112:423-440.
33. Polanski Z. 1986. In-vivo and in-vitro maturation rate of oocytes from two strains of mice. J Reprod Fertil 78:103-109.
34. Polanski Z. 1997. Genetic background of the differences in timing of meiotic maturation in mouse oocytes: A study using recombinant inbred strains of mice. J Reprod Fertil 109:109-114.
35. Polanski Z, Ledan E, Brunet S, Louvet S, Verlhac MH, Kubiak JZ, Maro B. 1998. Cyclin synthesis controls the progression of meiotic maturation in mouse oocytes. Development 125:4989-4997.
36. Polanski Z, Hoffmann S, Tsurumi C. 2005. Oocyte nucleus controls progression through meiotic maturation. Dev Biol 281:184-195.
37. Politz JCR, Polena I, Trask I, Bazett-Jones DP, Pedersen T. 2005. A nonribosomal landscape in the nucleolus revealed by stem cell protein nucleostemin. Mol Biol Cell 16:3401-3410.
38. Scherl A, Coute Y, Deon C, Calle K, Kindbeiter K, Sanchez JD, Greco A, Hochstrasser D, Diaz JJ. 2002. Functional proteomic analysis of human nucleolus. Mol Biol Cell 13:4100-4109.
39. Schultz RM. 1993. Regulation of zygotic gene activation in the mouse. Bioessays 15:531-538.
40. Takeuchi T, Ergun B, Huang TH, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD. 1999. A reliable technique of nuclear transplantation for immature mammalian oocytes. Human Reprod 14:1312-1317.
41. Takeuchi T, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD. 2004. A successful model to assess embryo development after transplantation of prophase nuclei. Human Reprod 19:975-981.
42. Tarkowski AK, Wróblewska J. 1967. Development of blastomeres of mouse eggs isolated at the 4- and 8-cell stage. J Embryol Exp Morph 18:155-180.
43. Telford NA, Watson AJ, Schultz GA. 1990. Transition from maternal to embryonic control in early mammalian development: A comparison of several species. Mol Reprod Dev 26:90-100.
44. Tesarik J, Greco E. 1999. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Human Reprod 14:1318-1323.
45. Tesarik J, Junca AM, Hazout A, Aubriot FX, Nathan C, Cohen-Bacrie P, Dumont-Hassan M. 2000. Embryos with high implantation potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection can be recognized by a simple, non-invasive examination of pronuclear morphology. Hum Reprod 15:1396-1399.
46. Thompson EM. 1996. Chromatin structure and gene expression in the preimplantation mammalian embryo. Reprod Nutr Dev 36:619-635.
47. Wang MK, Chen DY, Liu JL, Li GP, Sun QY. 2001. In vitro fertilisation of mouse oocytes reconstructed by transfer of metaphase II chromosomes results in live births. Zygote 9:9-14.
48. Watson AJ, Westhusin ME, de Sousa PA, Betts DH, Barcroft LC. 1999. Gene expression regulating blastocyst formation. Theriogenol 51:117-133.