Six-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays

Quintessence International

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 407-412

  Galiatsatos, Aristidis A ^a,b   Bergou, Dimitra ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Ceramic inlay; Ceramic onlay; Clinical performance; Esthetics; IPS empress system; Marginal discoloration

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; ALUMINUM SILICATES; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 42349106945     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Anusavice KJ. Criteria for selection of restorative materials: Properties versus technique sensitivity. In: Anusavice KJ (ed). Quality Evaluation of Dental Restorations: Criteria for placement and replacement. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989:15-59.
2. Roulet JF, Herber S. Bonded ceramic inlays. Chicago: Quintessence, 1991:90-95.
3. Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Ceramic Inlays and Veneers [in German]. Munich: Hanser, 1997.
4. Leinfelder KF, Sluder TB, Sockwell CL, Strickland WD, Wall JT. Clinical evaluation of composite resins as anterior and posterior restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:407-416.
5. Lutz F, Phillips RW, Roulet JF, Setcos JC. In vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:914-920.
6. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Accomplishments and expectations with posterior composite resins. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials (ed 3). St Paul:3M, 1985:521-540.
7. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989;17(suppl 1S):10-17.
8. Dietschi D, Holz J. A clinical trial of four light-curing posterior composite resins: Two-year report. Quintessence Int 1990;21:965-975.
9. Lehner CR, Scharer P. All-ceramic crowns. Curr Opin Dent 1992;2:45-52.
10. Seghi PR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8: 239-246.
11. Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Porcelain and Composite Inlays and Onlays. Chicago: Quintessence, 1994.
12. Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Scharer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: Technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:9-16.
13. Wohlwend A, Scharer P. The Empress technique. A new technique for the fabrication of full ceramic crowns, inlays, and veneers. Quintessenz Zahntech 1990;16:966-978.
14. Hickel R. The problem of tooth hypersensitivity following insertion of the placement of acid-etched inlays. Deutsche Zahnarztl Z 1990;45:740-742.
15. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: Clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000;25: 459-465.
16. Hayashi M, Tsuchtasni Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Six-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 2000;25:473-481.
17. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992;23:181-186.
18. Studer S, Lehner C, Scharer P. Glass ceramic inlays and onlays made by IPS Empress: First clinical results [abstract 1144]. J Dent Res 1992;71:658.
19. Peters MV, De Vree JH, Brekelmans WA. Distributed crack analysis of ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 1993;72: 1537-1542.
20. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann K, Hickel R. One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:410-416.
21. Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Manhart J, Kremers L, Kunzelmann K, Hickel R. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:391-397.
22. McKinney JE, Wu W. Chemical softening and wear of dental composites. J Dent Res 1985;64:1326-1331.
23. Roulet JF, Walti C. Influence of oral fluids on composite resin and glass-ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:182-189.
24. Vrijhoef MMA, Hendricks FHJ, Letzel H. Loss of substance of dental composite restorations. Dent Mater 1985,1:101-105.
25. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 1988;68:48-50.
26. Jensen ME. A two-year clinical study of posterior etched-porcelain resin bonded restoration. Am J Dent 1988;1:27-33.
27. Isidor F, Brondum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:140-144.
28. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wiler AD, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM generated ceramic inlays - A four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1171-1181.
29. Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int 1994;25:53-58.
30. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: Restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Quintessence Int 1994;25:199-207.