Application of membrane residue curve maps to batch and continuous processes

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 2361-2376

  Peters, Mark ^a   Kauchali, Shehzaad ^a   Hildebrandt, Diane ^a   Glasser, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

COLUMN PROFILE MAPS (CPM); FLUX EQUATIONS; HYBRID DISTILLATION-MEMBRANE;

DISTILLATION;

DISTILLATION; GRAPHIC METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 42349093857     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie071155j     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Rautenbach, R.; Albrecht, R. The Separation Potential of Pervaporation. Part 1. Discussion of Transport equations and comparison with Reverse Osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1985, 25, 1-23.
2. Clement, R.; Bendjama, Z.; Nguyen, Q. T.; Néel, J. Extraction of organics from aqueous solutions by Pervaporation. A novel method for membrane characterization and process design in ethyl acetate separation. J. Membr. Sci. 1992, 66, 193-203.
3. Fien, G. A. F.; Liu, Y. A. Heuristic Synthesis and Shortcut Design of Separation Processes Using Residue Curve Maps: A Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 2505-2522.
4. Wijmans, J. G.; Baker, R. W. The solution-diffusion model: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107, 1-21.
5. Rautenbach, R.; Albrecht, R. Membrane Processes; John Wiley: New York, 1989; pp 172-200.
6. Stepahn, W.; Noble, D. R.; Koval, C. A. Design methodology for a membrane/distillation column hybrid process. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 99, 259-272.
7. Rautenbach, R.; Albrecht, R. The Separation Potential of Pervaporation. Part 1. Proceess Design and Economics. J. Membr. Sci. 1985, 25, 25-54.
8. Marriot, J. I.; Sørensen, E.; Bogle, I. D. L. Detailed mathematical modelling of membrane modules. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2001, 25, 693-700.
9. Marriott, J.; Sørensen, E. A general approach to modelling membrane modules. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58, 4975-4990.
10. Feng, X.; Huang, R. Y. M. Separation of isopropanol from water by Pervaporation using silicone-based membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1992, 74, 171-181.
11. Qiao, X.; Chung, T.; Guo, W. F.; Matsuura, T.; Teoh, M. M. Dehyration of isopropanol and its comparison with dehydration of butanol isomers from thermodynamic and molecular aspects. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 252, 37-49.
12. Stoica-Guzun, A.; Abulescu, C.; Juncu, G. H.; Floarea, O. Extraction of urea with liquid surfactant membranes in a batch system. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51, 4745-4747.
13. Bausa, J.; Marquardt, W. Shortcut Design Methods for Hybrid Membrane/Distillation Process for the Separation of Nonideal Multicomponent Mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 1658-1672.
14. Blaisdell, C. T.; Kammermeyer, K. Counter-current and co-current gas separation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1973, 28, 1249-1255.
15. Tessendorf, S.; Gani, R.; Michelsen, M. L. Modeling, simulation and optimization of membrane-based gas separation systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54, 943-955.
16. Marriott, J.; Sørensen, E. The optimal design of membrane systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58, 4991-5004.
17. Chang, H.; Hou, W. Optimization of membrane gas permeation systems using genetic algorithm. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61, 5355-5368.
18. Hwang, S.; Thorman, J. M. The Continuous Membrane Column. AIChE J. 1980, 26, 558-566.
19. Yoshisato, R. A.; Hwang, S. Computer Simulation of a Continuous Membrane Column. J. Membr. Sci. 1984, 107, 1-21.
20. Matson, S. L.; Lopez, J.; Quinn, J. A. Separation of gases with synthetic membranes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1983, 38, 503-524.
21. Eliceche, A. M.; Davio, M. C.; Hoch, P. M.; Uribe, I. O. Optimization of azeotropic distillation columns combined with pervaporation membranes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 26, 563-573.
22. Verhoef, A.; Degreve, J.; Huybrechs, B.; van Veen, H.; Pex, P.; Van der Bruggen, B. Simulation of a hybrid pervaporation-distillation process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.04.014.
23. Pressly, T. G.; Ng, K. M. A Break-Even Analysis of Distillation-Membrane Hybrids. AIChE J. 1998, 44 (1), 93-105.
24. Van Hoof, V.; Van den Abeele, L.; Bukenhoudt, A.; Dotremont, C.; Leysen, R. Economic comparison between azeotropic distillation and different hybrid systems combining distillation with pervaporation for the dehydration of isopropanol. Sep. Purif. Techol. 2004, 37 (1), 33-49.
25. Sommer, S.; Melin, T.; Design and Optimization of Hybrid Separation Processes for the Dehydration of 2-Propanol and Other Organics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 5248-5259.
26. Peters, M.; Kauchali, S.; Hildebrandt, D.; Glasser, D. Derivation and Properties of Membrane Residue Curve Maps Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 9080-9087.
27. Huang, Y.; Sundmacher, K.; Qi, Z.; Schlunder, E. Residue curve maps of reactive membrane separation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2004, 59, 2863-2879.
28. King, C. J. Separation Processes. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1971; pp 106-108.
29. Peters, M.; Kauchali, S.; Hildebrandt, D.; Glasser, D. Separation of methanol/butene/MTBE using hybrid distillation-membrane processes. In Distillation & Absorption 2006; IChemE Symposium Series 152. Sorensen, E., Ed.; IChemE: London, 2006; pp 152-161.
30. Castillo, F. J. L.; Thong, D. Y. -C.; Towler, G. P. Homogeneous Azeotropic Distillation. 1. Design procedure for single-feed columns at nontotal reflux. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 987-997.
31. Tapp, M.; Holland, S. T.; Hildebrandt, D.; Glasser, D. Column Profile Maps. 1. Derivation and Interpretation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 364-374.
32. Holland, S. T.; Tapp, M.; Hildebrandt, D.; Glasser, D.; Hausberger, B. Novel separation system design using "moving triangles". Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 29, 181-189.