What kind of objectivity do we need for psychiatry? A commentary to Oulis's ontological assumptions in psychiatric taxonomy

Psychopathology

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 203-204

  Gabbani, Carlo ^a   Stanghellini, Giovanni ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COMMUNITY; EMPIRICISM; KNOWLEDGE; LIFE; MENTAL DISEASE; NATURAL SCIENCE; NOTE; PATHOLOGY; PSYCHIATRY; SOCIAL CLASS; TAXONOMY; THEORY;

AWARENESS; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MENTAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY;

EID: 42349085516     PISSN: 02544962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000121472     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Oulis P: Ontological assumptions of psychiatric taxonomy: main rival positions and their critical assessment. Psychopathology 2008;41:135-140.
2. Fulford B, Thornton T, Graham G: Oxford Textbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006.
3. Hornsby J: Personal and sub-personal: a defence of Dennett's early distinction. Philos Explor 2000;2:6-24.
4. Stanghellini G: The grammar of psychiatric interview: a plea for the second person mode of understanding (editorial). Psychopathology 2007;40:69-74.