Antecedents of virtual community satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical test of competing theories

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 138-144

  Lin, Hsiu Fen ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERCEPTION; SATISFACTION; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TECHNOLOGY; THEORY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUESTIONNAIRES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 42349085314     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ahn T, Ryu S, Han I. The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2004; 3:405-20.
2. Lin HF. Understanding behavioral intention to participate in virtual communities. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2006; 9:540-47.
3. Teo HH, Chan HC, Wei KK, Zhang Z. Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2003; 59:671-97.
4. Lin HF, Lee GG. Determinants of success for online communities: an empirical study. Behaviour & Information Technology 2006; 25:479-88.
5. Yoo WS, Suh KS, Lee MB. Exploring the factors enhancing member participation in online communities. Journal of Global Information Management 2002; 10:55-71.
6. Cothrel J, Williams R. Understanding online communities. Strategic Communication Management 1999; 3:16-21.
7. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and end user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989; 13:319-40.
9. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989; 35:982-1003.
10. Seddon PB. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research 1997; 8:240-53.
11. DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information system success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 1992; 3:60-95.
12. Zviran M, Erlich Z. Measuring IS user satisfaction: review and implications. Communication of the AIS 2003; 12:81-104.
13. Preece J. Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology 2001; 20:347-56.
14. Oliver R. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decision. Journal of Marketing Research 1980; 22:460-69.
15. Bhattacherjee A. An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decision Support Systems 2001; 32:201-14.
16. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 1991; 2:192-222.
17. Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 2000; 24:665-94.
18. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 1988; 103:411-23.
19. Kline RB. (1988). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
20. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Chin WW, Gopal A, Salisbury WD. Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: the development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information Systems Research 1997; 8: 342-67.
22. Chau PYK, Hu PJH. Information technology acceptance by individual professional: a model comparison approach. Decision Sciences 2001; 32:699-719.
23. Taylor S, Todd .A. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 1995; 6:144-76.