Does private income support sustainable agroforestry in Spanish dehesa?

Land Use Policy

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 510-522

  Campos, Pablo ^a   Ovando, Paola ^a   Montero, Gregorio ^b  

^a The Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas   (Spain)

^b INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Amenities; Environmental services; Monte; Oak silviculture; Rural development policy; Total income

Indexed keywords

AGROFORESTRY; BIODIVERSITY; EUROPEAN UNION; INCOME; LAND USE; POLICY REFORM; REGENERATION; RURAL DEVELOPMENT; SILVICULTURE; WOODLAND;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

QUERCUS; QUERCUS SUBER;

EID: 42249115246     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE), 2001. Real Decreto 6/2001, de 12 de enero, sobre fomento de la forestación de tierras agrícolas. BOE 12, 1621-1630.
2. Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE), 2007. Ley 1/2007, de 2 de marzo, sobre la declaración del Parque Nacional de Monfragüe. BOE 54, 9106-9116
3. Buyolo, T., Troca, A., Cabezas, J., Escudero, J.C., 1998. Ordenación de los complejos ambientales del Parque Natural de Monfragüe y su área de influencia. Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, 167pp.
4. Campos P. La renta ambiental en las dehesas de producción de ganado de lidia. Revista del Instituto de Estudios Económicos 3 (2005) 141-161
5. Campos P., and Caparrós A. Social and private total Hicksian incomes of multiple use forests in Spain. Ecological Economics 57 4 (2006) 545-557
6. Campos P., and Mariscal P. Preferencias de los propietarios e intervención pública: el caso de las dehesas de la comarca de Monfragüe. Investigación Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 12 3 (2003) 407-422
7. Campos P., and Martínez M. Multiple use of Pinus sylvestris and Quercus pyrenaica forests in the Spanish Central System. Sustainability of Agro-silvo-pastoral Systems. Dehesas and Montados. In: Schnabel S., and Gonçalves A. (Eds). Advances in GeoEcology vol. 37 (2004), Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen 71-83
8. Campos P., and Riera P. Rentabilidad social de los bosques. Análisis aplicado a las dehesas y montados ibéricos. Recursos, Ambiente y Sociedad 751 (1996) 47-62
9. Campos P., Rodríguez Y., and Caparrós A. Towards the Dehesa total income accounting: theory and operative Monfragüe study cases. Investigación Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales Special Issue 1 (2001) 45-69
10. Campos P., Martín D., and Montero G. Economías de la reforestación del alcornoque y la regeneración natural del alcornocal. In: Pulido F.J., Campos P., and Montero G. (Eds). La gestión forestal de la dehesa (2003), Junta de Extremadura and IPROCOR, Mérida 107-164
11. Campos P., Oviedo J.L., and Ovando P. La cadena de la economía del corcho en los Montes Propios de Jerez de la Frontera. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros 208 (2005) 83-113
12. Campos, P., Caparrós, A., Oviedo, J.L., Huntsinger, L., Seita-Coelho, I., 2006. Contingent valuation of private amenities from the Mediterranean woodlands of Spain, Portugal and California. In: Ninth Biennial Conference of ISEE on Ecological Sustainability and Human Well-Being, New Delhim, India, 15-19 December 2006.
13. Campos, P., Daly-Hassen, H., Oviedo, J.L., Ovando, P., Chebil, A., 2007. Accounting for single and aggregated forest incomes: application to public cork oak forests in Jerez (Spain) and Iteimia (Tunisia). Ecological Economics. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.001.
14. Caparrós A., Campos P., and Montero G. An operative framework for total Hicksian income measurement: application to a multiple use forest. Environmental & Resource Economics 26 (2003) 173-198
15. Díaz M., Campos P., and Pulido F.J. The Spanish dehesas: a diversity in land-use and wildlife. In: Pain D.J., and Pienkowski M.W. (Eds). Farming and Birds in Europe. The Common Agricultural Policy and its Implications for Bird Conservation (1997), Academic Press, London 178-209
16. European Commission, 2005. Council regulation (EC) no. 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). EU Official Journal 277, 1-38.
17. European Commission, 2006. Community committee for the farm accountancy data network Farm Return Data Definitions Accounting years 2006, 2007. RI/CC 1256 rev. 4. European Communities, Brussels, 71pp.
18. European Communities, 1988. Community strategy and action programme for the forestry sector. Communication of the Commission COM (88) 255 final, 74pp.
19. Eurostat, 1996. European System of Accounts: ESA-95. European Communities, Luxemburg, 383pp.
20. Eurostat. Manual on Economic Accounts for Agriculture and Forestry-EAA/EAF 97 (Rev.1.1) (2000), European Communities, Luxemburg 181pp
21. Eurostat. The European framework for integrated environmental and economic accounting for forests-IEEAF (2002), European Communities, Luxemburg 106pp
22. Huntsinger L., Sulak A., Gwin L., and Plieninger T. Oak Woodland Ranchers in California and Spain. In: Schnabel S., and Ferreira A. (Eds). Sustainability of Agro-Silvo-Pastoral Systems. Dehesas, Montados. Advances of GeoEcology vol. 37 (2004), Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen 309-326
23. Institut National De La Recherche Agronomique (INRA), 1978. Principes de la nutrition et de d'alimentation des ruminants. Besoins alimentaires del animaux. Valeur nutritive des aliments. INRA, Versailles.
24. Joffre R., Rambal S., and Ratte J.P. The dehesa system of southern Spain and Portugal as a natural ecosystem mimic. Agroforestry Systems 45 (1999) 57-79
25. Lange, G.M., 2004. Manual for environmental and economic accounts for forestry: a tool for cross-sectoral policy analysis. FAO Working Paper. FAO, Rome, 120pp.
26. Marañón T. Diversidad florística y heterogeneidad ambiental en una dehesa de Sierra Morena. Anales de Edafología y Agrobiología 54 (1985) 1183-1198
27. Martín D., Campos P., Montero G., and Cañellas I. Extended cost benefit analysis of holm oak dehesa multiple use and cereal grass rotations. Investigación Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales Special Issue 1 (2001) 109-124
28. Mendes A.M.S.C. Portugal. In: Merlo M., and Croitoru L. (Eds). Valuing Mediterranean Forests: Towards Total Economic Value (2005), CAB International, Wallingford 331-352
29. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (MAPA). Encuesta de precios de la tierra 2003 (Base 1997) (2003), Secretaría General Técnica, MAPA, Madrid 54pp
30. Montero, G., Martín, D., Campos, P., Cañellas, I., 2000. Selvicultura y producción del encinar (Quercus ilex L.) en la comarca de Monfragüe. CSIC-INIA-UCM Internal Working Paper. CSIC-INIA-UCM, Madrid, 47pp.
31. Montero G., Martín D., Cañellas I., and Campos P. Selvicultura y producción del alcornocal. In: Pulido F.J., Campos P., and Montero G. (Eds). La gestión forestal de la dehesa (2003), Junta de Extremadura and IPROCOR, Mérida 63-106
32. Nordhaus W., and Kokkelenberg E.C. Nature's numbers: expanding the national economic accounts to include the environment (1999), National Academic Press, Washington 250pp
33. Ovando, P., Campos, P., Montero, G., 2007. Forestaciones con encina y alcornoque en el área de la dehesa (1993-2000). Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros, 214, forthcoming.
34. Plieninger T. Las dehesas de la penillanura cacereña. Origen y evolución de un paisaje cultural (2006), Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres 198pp
35. Plieninger T. Compatibility of livestock grazing with stand regeneration in Mediterranean holm oak parklands. Journal for Nature Conservation 15 (2007) 1-9
36. Pulido F.J., and Díaz M. Dinámica de la regeneración natural del arbolado de encina y alcornoque. In: Pulido F.J., Campos P., and Montero G. (Eds). La gestión forestal de la dehesa (2003), Junta de Extremadura and IPROCOR, Mérida 39-62
37. Pulido F.J., Díaz M., and Hidalgo S.J. Size structure and regeneration of Spanish holm oak Quercus ilex forests and dehesas: effects of agroforestry use on their long-term sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management 146 1-3 (2001) 1-13
38. Raunikar R., and Buongiorno J. Willingness to pay for forest amenities: The case of non-industrial owners in the south central United States. Ecological Economics 56 (2006) 132-143
39. Rodríguez Y., Campos P., and Ovando P. The commercial economics of a public dehesa in the Monfragüe shire. In: Schnabel S., and Ferreira A. (Eds). Sustainability of Agro-silvo-pastoral Systems. Dehesas, Montados. Advances of GeoEcology vol. 37 (2004), Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen 85-96
40. Samuel J., and Thomas T. The valuation of unpriced forest products by private woodland owners in Wales. In: Roper C.S., and Park A. (Eds). The Living Forest. Non-Market Benefits of Forestry (1999), Forestry Commission, London 203-212
41. Torell L.A., Rimbe N.N., Tanaka J.A., and Bailey S.A. The lack of a profit motive for ranching: implications for policy analysis. In: Torell L.A., Barlett T., and Larrañaga R. (Eds). Current Issues in Rangeland Resource Economics (2001), Annual Meeting of the Society for Range Management 47-58
42. Torell L.A., Rimbey N.R., Ramírez O.A., and McCollum D.W. Income earning potential versus consumptive amenities in determining Ranchland values. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30 3 (2005) 537-560
43. United Nations European, Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and World Bank, 2003. Handbook of National Accounting. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003 (SEEA, 2003). Final Version, 598pp.