How does a three-dimensional continuum muscle model affect the kinematics and muscle strains of a finite element neck model compared to a discrete muscle model in rear-end, frontal, and lateral impacts

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2008, Pages

  Hedenstierna, Sofia ^a   Halldin, Peter ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cervical musculature; Continuum elements; FE modeling; Impact simulations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL SPINE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEAD; KINEMATICS; MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUSCLE STRAIN; NECK; NECK MUSCLE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; VISCOELASTICITY;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NECK MUSCLES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; WHIPLASH INJURIES;

EID: 42249108383     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816b8812     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kumar S, Narayan Y, Amell T. An electromyographic study of low-velocity rear-end impacts. Spine 2002;27:1044-55.
2. Magnusson ML, Pope MH, Hasselquist L, et al. Cervical electromyographic activity during low-speed rear impact. Eur Spine J 1999;8:118-25.
3. Ono K, Kaneoka K, Wittek A, et al. Cervical injury mechanism based on the analysis of human cervical vertebral motion and head-neck-torso kinematics during low speed rear impacts. Stapp Car Crash 1997;106:3859-76.
4. Siegmund GP, Sanderson DJ, Myers BS, et al. Rapid neck muscle adaptation alters the head kinematics of aware and unaware subjects undergoing multiple whiplash-like perturbations. J Biomech 2003;36:473-82.
5. Brolin K, Halldin P, Leijonhufvud I. The effect of muscle activation on neck response. Traffic Inj Prev 2005;6:67-76.
6. Chancey VC, Nightingale RW, Van Ee CA, et al. Improved estimation of human neck tensile tolerance: reducing the range of reported tolerance using anthropmetrically correct muscles and optimized physiologic initial conditions. Stapp Car Crash J 2003;47:135-53.
7. Ejima S, Ono K. Development and validation of the human neck muscle model under impact loading. Presented at the IRCOBI conference. Prague (Czech Republic) 2005;27:651-54.
8. van der Horst MJ, Jan T, Riender H, et al. Influence of muscle activity on head-neck response during impact. Presented at the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference; 1997.
9. Wittek A. Mathematical modeling of the muscle effects on the human body responses under transient loads. Example of the head-neck complex. Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola: Göteborg; 2000:1-93.
10. Kimpara H, Nakahira Y, Iwamoto M, et al. Investigation of anteroposterior head-neck responses during severe frontal impacts using a brain-spinal cord complex FE model. Stapp Car Crash J 2006;50:509-44.
11. Jost R, Nurick GN. Development of a finite element model of the human neck subjected to high g-level lateral deceleration. Int J Crashworthiness 2000;5:259-69.
12. Hallquist JO. LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual. Software Technology Corporation: Livermore; 2007.
13. Hill AV. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Seris B, Biological Sciences; 1938;136-93.
14. Brolin K. Cervical Spine Injuries-Numerical Analysis an Statistical Survey, in Department of Aeronautics. Royal Institute of Technology, KTH: Stockholm; 2002.
15. Halldin P. Prevention and prediction of head and neck injury in traffic accidents-using experimental and numerical methods. In: Department of Aeronautics. Royal Institute of Technology, KTH: Stockholm; 2001.
16. Goel VK, Liu YK, Clark CR. Quantitative geometry of the muscular origins and insertions of the human head and neck. In: Sances A Jr, ed. Mechanisms of Head and Spine Trauma. Goshen, NY: Aloray: NY; 1986.
17. Kapandji IA. The Physiology of the Joints: Annotated Diagrams of the Mechanics of the Human Joints. London: E&S Livingstone; 1974.
18. Myers BS, Ca Van EE, Camacho DLA, et al. On the structural and material properties of mammalian skeletal muscle and its relevance to human cervical impact dynamics. Presented at the Stapp Car Crash Conference Proceedings; 1995.
19. Winters JM, Stark L. Estimated mechanical properties of synergistic muscles involved in movements of a variety of human joints. J Biomech 1988;21:1027-41.
20. Van Ee CA, Nightingale WR, Camacho DL, et al. Tensile properties of the human muscular and ligamentous cervical spine. Stapp Car Crash J 2000;44:85-102.
21. Ogden RW. Large deformation isotropic elasticity-on the correlation of theory and experiment for compressible rubberlike solids. Rubber Chem Technol 1973;46:398-416.
22. Amira. Amira. Mercury Computer Systems; 2006.
23. Ellis H, Logan B, Dixon A. Human cross-sectional anatomy, Atlas of body sections and CT images. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991.
24. Gray, et al. Gray's Anatomy. 37 ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1989.
25. Netter FH. The CIBA Collection of Medical Illustrations. Vol 8. Musculoskeletal system. Summit, NJ: CIBA-GEIGY corporation; 1987.
26. Anderson JS, Hsu AW, Vasavada AN. Morphology, architecture, and biomechanics of human cervical multifidus. Spine 2005;30:E86-E91.
27. Boyd-Clark LC, Briggs CA, Galea MP. Muscle spindle distribution, morphology, and density in longus colli and multifidus muscles of the cervical spine. Spine 2002;27:694-701.
28. Kamibayashi LK, Richmond FJR. Morphometry of human neck muscles. Spine 1998;23:1314-23.
29. Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Barbet JP, Bargy F, et al. Method of quantitative anatomical study of the dorsal neck muscles. Preliminary study. Surg Radiol Anat 1990;12:181-5.
30. Vasavada AN, Li S, Delp SL. Influence of muscle morphometry and moment arms on the moment-generating capacity of human neck muscles. Spine 1998;23:412-22.
31. Holm, D. Ropt. ALFGAM Optimering AB: Tyresö; 2005.
32. Ewing CL, Thomas DJ, Lustick L, et al. Effect of duration, rate of onset and peak sled acceleration on the dynamic response of the human head and neck. Stapp Car Crash 1976;3-41.
33. Davidsson J, Lövsund P, Ono K, et al. A Comparison between volunteer, BioRID P3 and Hybrid III performance in rear impacts. Presented at the IRCOBI conference. Sitges (Spain); 1999.
34. Ono K, Inami S, Kaneoka K, et al. Relationship between spine deformation and cervical vertebral motions for low speed rear impacts using human volunteers. Presented at the IRCOBI conference Sitges (Spain); 1999.
35. Best TM. A biomechanical study of skeletal muscle strain injuries, in Department of Biomedical Engineering. Duke University; 1993.
36. Davis J, Kaufman KR, Lieber RL. Correlation between active and passive isometric force and intramuscular pressure in the isolated rabbit tibialis anterior muscle. J Biomech 2003;36:505-12.
37. Garrett WE Jr, Safran MR, Seaber AV, et al. Biomechanical comparison of stimulated and nonstimulated skeletal muscle pulled to failure. Am J Sports Med 1987;15:448-54.
38. Yamada H. Strength of Biological Materials. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1970.
39. Hasselman CT, Best TM, Seaber AV, et al. A threshold and continuum of injury during active stretch of rabbit skeletal muscle. Am J Sports Med 1995;23:65-73.