A landscape perspective on differentiated management for production of timber and nature conservation values

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 153-161

  Andersson, Mikael ^a   Sallnäs, Ola ^a   Carlsson, Mattias ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Deciduous trees; Multiple use; Production allocation; Production possibility

Indexed keywords

CONIFER TIMBERS; PRODUCTION ALLOCATION; PRODUCTION POSSIBILITY; RESTRICTED PLANNING;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; FORESTRY; FORESTS; HARDWOODS; MULTIPLE USE;

CONIFEROPHYTA;

EID: 42249107069     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Agestam, E., Blennow, K., Carlsson, M., Nilkasson, M., Nilsson, S. G., Nilsson, U., Sallnäs, O., Stjernquist, I., Sverdrup, H. Assessment of productivity scenarios for the Asa Forest Research Park. In: Sverdrup, H., Stjernquist, I. (Eds.), Developing Principals and Models for Sustainable Forestry in Sweden. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Ahti T., Hämet-Ahti L., and Jalas J. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici 5 (1968) 169-211
3. Andersson R. Från lind till gran på tvåtusen år. En skogshistorisk studie på Asa försökspark. Examensarbete nr 2. Examensarbete vol. 2 (1996), Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för sydsvensk skogsvetenskap, Alnarp 38 pp. (in Swedish with summary in English)
4. Anonymous, 1992. Skogsdata-aktuella uppgifter om de svenska skogarna från riksskogstaxeringen. Dept. of Field Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Umeå, Sweden. 75 pp.
5. Anonymous. Lag om ändring av skogsvårdslagen (SFS 1979:429), SFS 1993:553 (1993), Fakta Info Direkt AB, Stockholm (in Swedish)
6. Berg Å., Ehnström B., Gustafsson L., Hallingbäck T., Jonsell M., and Weslien J. Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat association. Conservation Biology 8 3 (1994) 718-731
7. Bostedt G., and Mattsson L. Determining appropriate institutions for environmental conflict resolution. Journal of Forest Economics 2 2 (1996) 131-146
8. Carlsson M. On Forestry Planning for Timber and Biodiversity- the Landscape Perspective. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae vol. 64 (1998), Swedish University of Agriculturale Sciences
9. Claesson A. Kartläggning av lövskog i IR-flygbilder. Examensarbete vol. 26 (2001), Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för sydsvensk skogsvetenskap, Alnarp 19 pp. (in Swedish with summary in English)
10. Crow A.B., and Shilling C.L. Use of prescribed burning to enhance southern pine timber production. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 4 (1980) 15-18
11. FSC. Svensk FSC-standard för certifiering av skogsbruk. Accessible in May 2002 at (2000, May). www.fsc-sverige.org 37 pp. (in Swedish)
12. Gregory R.G. An economic approach to multiple use. Forest Science 1 1 (1955) 6-13
13. Hägglund B. En ny svensk riksskogstaxering (A New Swedish National Forest Survey). Rapport vol. 37 (1985), Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för skogstaxering, Umeå (in Swedish with summary in English summary)
14. Jonson B., and Jonson T. Optimal harvesting time in single- and multi-purpose forest management. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 7 4 (1992) 571-574
15. Lindbladh M., and Bradshaw R. The development and demise of a Medieval forest-meadow system at Linnaeus' birthplace in southern Sweden: implications for conservation and forest history. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 4 (1995) 153-160
16. Lindbladh M., and Bradshaw R. The origin of present forest composition and pattern in southern Sweden. Journal of Biogeography 25 (1998) 463-477
17. Malmgren K. Generell eller koncentrerad naturvård? Forskardebatt om olika skolor. Skogseko 3 (2002) 11 Oktober (in Swedish)
18. Nilsson S.G. Forests in the temperate-boreal transition-natural and man-made features. In: Hansson L. (Ed). Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation (1992), Elsevier Applied Science, London 373-393
19. Nilsson, S. G., Niklasson, M., Hedin, J. Ljungberg, H., Svensson, M., in press. Principles of biodiversity preservation in sustainable forestry. In: Sverdrup, H., Stjernquist, I. (Eds.), Developing Principals and Models for Sustainable Forestry in Sweden. Kluwer Academic Publishers (in press).
20. Östlund, L. 1993. Exploitation and structural changes in the northern Swedish boreal forest 1800-1992. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Dept. of Forest Vegetation Ecology. Dissertation in Forest Vegetation Ecology no 4.
21. PEFC. Tekniskt dokument.System för certifiering av skogsbruk och virkesflöde. Accessible in September 2002 at (2002). www.pefc.se 37 pp. (in Swedish)
22. Price C. Is discounting sustainable?. In: Solberg B. (Ed). Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics Gausdal, Norway, April 1991. Scandinavian Forest Economics 33 (1992) 15-43
23. Skogsstyrelsen. Skogsvårdslagen: handbok [The Swedish Forestry Act] (1994), Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping 66 pp. (in Swedish)
24. Skogsstyrelsen. Mål för ett uthålligt skogsbruk-natinella sektorsmål. Stencil (1998), Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping 15 pp. (in Swedish)
25. Vincent J.R., and Binkley C.S. Efficient multiple-use forestry may require land-use specialization. Land Economics 69 4 (1993) 370-376
26. Walstad J.D., and Kuch P.J. Forest Vegetation Management for Conifer Production (1987), Wiley, New York, USA 523 pp.