Efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening methods

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie

Volumn 46, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Brenner, H ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENDOSCOPY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OCCULT BLOOD; PRECANCER; SIGMOIDOSCOPY;

COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GERMANY; MASS SCREENING; OCCULT BLOOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 42249104740     PISSN: 00442771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963481     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial Investigators. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 1291-1300
2. Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B et al. Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of "once-only sigmoidoscopy" - SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1763-1772
3. Bretthauer M, Gondal G, Larsen K et al. Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia: attendance rates in the NORCCAP study (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention). Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 568-573
4. Weissfeld JL, Schoen RE, Pinsky PF et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO cancer screening trial: results from the baseline screening examination of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 989-997
5. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 132-141
6. Maciosek MV, Solberg LI, Coffield AB et al. Colorectal cancer screening. Health impact and cost effectiveness. Am J Prev Med 2006; 31: 80-89
7. Haug U, Brenner H. A simulation model for colorectal cancer screening: potential of stool tests with various performance characteristics compared with screening colonoscopy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14: 422-428
8. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al. Potential for colorectal cancer prevention of sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy: population-based case control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16: 494-499
9. Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 96-104
10. Brenner H, Arndt V, Stürmer T et al. Long-lasting reduction of risk of colorectal cancer following screening endoscopy. Br J Cancer 2001; 85: 972-976
11. Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Morimoto LM et al. Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 622-625
12. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al. Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? Gut 2006; 55: 1145-1150
13. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al. Case-control study supports extension of surveillance interval after colonoscopic polypectomy to at least 5 years. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1739-1744
14. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: A consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1872-1885
15. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1863-1872
16. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V et al. Gender differences in colorectal cancer: implications for age at initiation of screening. Brit J Cancer 2007; 43: 921-927
17. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Stegmaier C et al. Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: Estimates based on 840,149 screening colonoscopies. Gut 2007; Epub ahead of print
18. Ko CW, Sonnenberg A. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1163-1170
19. Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Schembre DB et al. Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients: prevalence of neoplasia and estimated impact on life expectancy. JAMA 2006; 295: 2357-2365
20. Paramore LC, Thomas SK, Knopf KB et al. Estimating costs of care for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2006; 6: 52-58