Dark adaptation is critical for accurate pupil measurement

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 126, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 584-

  Brown, Sandra M ^a   Bradley, Jay C ^b   Khanani, Arshad M ^b  

^a Cabarrus Eye Center   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGE DISTRIBUTION; BIOMETRY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DARK ADAPTATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; KERATOMILEUSIS; LETTER; PHOTORECEPTOR; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; RETINA ROD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CORNEA; DARK ADAPTATION; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MYOPIA; PUPIL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 42249097690     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 00039950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.126.4.584     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Schmidt GW, Yoon M, McGwin G, Lee PP, McLeod SD. Evaluation of the relationship between ablation diameter, pupil size, and visual function with vision-specific quality-of-life measures after laser in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(8):1037-1042.
2. Alpern M, Ohba N. The effect of bleaching and backgrounds on pupil size. Vision Res. 1972;12(5):943-951.
3. Borgmann H. Basic principles of clinical pupillography, 3: age dependence of the light reaction parameters [in German]. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1972;185(1):1-10.
4. Brown SM, Khanani AM, Xu KT. Day to day variability of the dark-adapted pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(3):639-644.
5. Brown SM, Khanani AM, McCartney DL. The effect of daily use of brimonidine tartrate on the dark-adapted pupil diameter. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(1):149-151.