Application of cumulative prospect theory: Implied seismic design preference

Structural Safety

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 506-516

  Goda, K ^a   Hong, H P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cumulative prospect theory; Lifecycle cost analysis; Optimal seismic design; Risk attitude; Seismic risk

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; CHARGE TRAPPING; COST ACCOUNTING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST FUNCTIONS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; NUMBER THEORY; PROBLEM SOLVING; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISKS; SAFETY ENGINEERING; SEISMOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SET THEORY;

BOUNDED RATIONALITY; CUMULATIVE PROSPECT THEORY; DECISION MAKER (DM); ELSEVIER (CO); EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY (EUT); GENERAL (CO); LIFE-CYCLE COST (LCC); LOW PROBABILITY; MODEL PARAMETERS; NUMERICAL EXAMPLES; REFERENCE POINT (RP); SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT; WEIGHTING FUNCTIONS;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

EID: 42249096217     PISSN: 01674730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2007.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Rosenblueth E. Optimum design for infrequent disturbances. J Struct Div, ASCE 102 (1976) 1807-1825
2. Kang Y.J., and Wen Y.K. Minimum lifecycle cost structural design against natural hazards (2000), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
3. Rackwitz R. Optimization - the basis of code-making and reliability verification. Struct Saf 22 (2000) 27-60
4. Goda K., and Hong H.P. Optimal seismic design for limited planning time horizon with detailed seismic hazard information. Struct Saf 28 (2006) 247-260
5. Rosenblueth E. What should we do with structural reliabilities. Proc of the ICASP 5 (1987), University of Waterloo, Waterloo (Canada) 24-34
6. Goda K., and Hong H.P. Optimal seismic design considering risk attitude, societal tolerable risk level and life quality criterion. J Struct Eng, ASCE 132 (2006) 2027-2035
7. Simon H.A. Models of bounded rationality (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge
8. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty 5 (1992) 297-323
9. Palm R. Earthquake insurance - a longitudinal study of California homeowners (1995), Westview Press, Boulder
10. Loewenstein G.F., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K., and Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bull 127 (2001) 267-286
11. Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econom Rev 93 (2003) 1449-1475
12. Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility. J Econom Behavior Organization 3 (1982) 323-343
13. Schmidt U. Reference dependence in cumulative prospect theory. J Math Psychol 47 (2003) 122-131
14. Davies GB. Pure risk: the role of rational and behavioral risk attitudes in decision making. Cambridge (UK): PhD thesis, University of Cambridge; 2005.
15. Abdellaoui M. Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Manage Sci 46 (2000) 1497-1512
16. Prelec D. Compound invariant weighting functions in prospect theory. Choices, values, and frames (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 67-92
17. Adams J, Halchuk S. Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: values for over 650 Canadian localities intended for the 2005 National Building Code of Canada. Ottawa: Open-File 4459, Geological Survey of Canada; 2003.
18. Hong H.P., and Hong P. Reliability of bilinear SDOF systems subjected to earthquake loading. Proc of the int conf on advances in Eng Struct, Mech & Construction (2006), Springer, Waterloo (Canada) 711-723
19. NBCC. National Building Code of Canada 2005. Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada; 2005.