Repositioning family planning to reduce unmet needs

African Renaissance

Volumn 4, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 83-101

  Bisika, Thomas ^a   Short, Madeleine ^a   Wontumi, Gold Marie ^a   Truong, Jenny ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42249091460     PISSN: 17442532     EISSN: 25165305     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.10520/EJC10276     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population prospects: the 2004 revision and World urbanization prospects: the 2003 revision. http://esa.un.org/unpp. Accessed July 17, 2006.
2. Cleland J, Sinding S. What would Malthus say about AIDS in Africa? Lancet 2005; 366(9500): 1899-901.
3. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World contraceptive use 2005. United Nations, New York: 2006.
4. Ngom P. Men's unmet need for family planning: implications for African fertility transitions. Studies in Family Planning. 1997;28(3):192-202.
5. viii Dairo A. Youth unmet FP/RH needs and implication for achieving health and development goals presentation on behalf of UNFPA at Repositioning Family Planning/Reproductive Health for Youth Conference. Accra, Ghana: February 2005.
6. Black TL, Harvey PD. A report on a contraceptive social marketing experiment in rural Kenya. Studies in Family Planning. 1976;7(4):101-108.
7. Anyanti J, Omoregie G. The Nigerian box score shows higher levels of condom use among male Nigerian youth exposed to PSI campaigns. PSI Research Quickie. Population Services International: December 2004.
8. Plautz A, Meekers D. Evaluation of the reach and impact of the 100% Jeune youth social marketing in Cameroon. PSI Research Quickie. Population Services International: April 2004.
9. Phillips JF, Greene WL, Jackson EF. Lessons from community-based distribution of family planning in Africa. Working Paper No. 121. Population Council, New York: 1999.
10. Stoebenau K, Valente TW. Using network analysis to understand community-based programs: a case study from Highland Madagascar. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2003;29(4):167-173.
11. Luck M, Jarju E, Nell MD, George MO. Mobilizing demand for contraception in rural Gambia. Studies in Family Planning. 2000;31(4):325-335.
12. Tawye Y, Jotie F, Shigu T, Ngom P, Maggwa N. The potential impact of community-based distribution programmes on contraceptive uptake in resource-poor settings: evidence from Ethiopia. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2005;9(3):15-26.
13. Katz KR, West CG, Doumbia F, Fatoumata K. Increasing access to family planning services in rural Mali through community-based distribution. International Family Planning Perspectives. 1998;24(3):104-110.
14. Solo J, Jacobstein R, Malema D. Repositioning family planning-Malawi case study: choice, not chance. The ACQUIRE Project/EngenderHealth, New York: 2005.
15. Debpuur C, Phillips JF, Jackson EF, Nazzar A, Ngom P, Binka FN. The impact of the Navrongo Project on contraceptive knowledge and use, reproductive preferences, and fertility. Studies in Family Planning. 2002;33(2):141-164.
16. Gupta N, Katende C, Bessinger R. Associations of mass media exposure with family planning attitudes and practices in Uganda. Studies in Family Planning. 2003;34(1):19-31.
17. Jato MN, et al. The impact of multimedia family planning promotion on the contraceptive behavior of women in Tanzania. International Family Planning Perspectives. 1999;25(2):60-67.
18. Kim YM, Kols A, Nyakauru R, Marangwanda C, Chibatamoto P. Promoting sexual responsibility among young people in Zimbabwe. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2001;27(1):11-19.
19. Johnson BR, Ndhlovu S, Farr SL, Chipato T. Reducing unplanned pregnancy and abortion in Zimbabwe through postabortion contraception. Studies in Family Planning. 2002; 33(2): 195-202.
20. Solo J, Billings DL, Aloo-Obunga C, Ominde A, Makumi M. Creating linkages between incomplete abortion treatment and family planning services in Kenya. Studies in Family Planning. 1999;30(1):17-27.
21. Rutenberg N, et al. Family planning and PMTCT services: Examining interrelationships, strengthening linkages. Horizons Research Summary. Population Council: Washington, DC. 2003.
22. Bankole A. Desired fertility and fertility behavior among the Yoruba of Nigeria: a study of couple preferences and subsequent fertility. Population Studies. 1995;49(2):317-328.
23. Bawah AA, Akweongo P, Simmons R, Phillips JF. Women's fears and men's anxieties: the impact of family planning on gender relations in northern Ghana. Studies in Family Planning. 1999;30(1):54-66.
24. Wolff B, Blanc AK, Ssekamatte-Ssebuliba J. The role of couple negotiation in unmet need for contraception and the decision to stop childbearing in Uganda. Studies in Family Planning. 2000;31(2)124-137.
25. Mwageni EA, Ankomah A, Powell RA. Attitudes of men towards family planning in Mbeya region, Tanzania: a rural-urban comparison of qualitative data. Journal of Biosocial Science. 1998;30:381-392.
26. Sternberg P, Hubley J. Evaluating men's involvement as a strategy in sexual and reproductive health promotion. Health Promotion International.2004;19(3):389-396.
27. Kaida A, Kipp W, Hessel P, Kondu-Lule J. Male participation in family planning: results from a qualitative study in Mpigi district, Uganda. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2005;37:269-286.
28. Inhorn MC. Middle Eastern masculinities in the age of new reproductive technologies: male infertility and stigma in Egypt and Lebanon. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 2004; 18(2):162-182.
29. Van Rossem R, Meekers D. An evaluation of the effectiveness of targeted social marketing to promote adolescent and young adult reproductive health in Cameroon. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2000;12(5): 383-404.
30. Speizer IS, Tambashe BO, Tegang SP. An evaluation of the "Entre Nous Jeunes" peer-educator program for adolescents in Cameroon. Studies in Family Planning. 2001;31(4):339-351.
31. Brieger WR, Delano GE, Lane CG, Oladepo O, Oyediran KA. West African Youth Initiative: outcome of a reproductive health program. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2001;29(6):436-446.S
32. Population Reference Bureau. The World's Youth: 2006 Data Sheet. http://www.prb.org/pdf06/WorldsYouth2006DataSheet.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2006.
33. Bulatao, R. The value of family planning programs in developing countries. RAND, Washington DC: 1998.
34. Population Reference Bureau. Policy Brief. The unfinished agenda: meeting the need for family planning in less developed countries. Population Reference Bureau: 2004.
35. Feyistan BJ, Ainsworth M. Contraceptive use and the quality, price and availability of family planning in Nigeria. Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS) Working Paper. Washington D.C.: World Bank. 1994, No. 108.
36. Winfrey W, Heaton L, Fox T, Adamchak S. Factors influencing the growth of the commercial sector in family planning service provision. POLICY Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 6. Futures Group International, POLICY Project: 2000.
37. Interim Working Group on Reproductive Health and Commodity Security. Financing contraceptive supplies in developing countries: summary of issues, options and experience. Washington, D.C.: 2001.
38. Sine J. How much is enough? Estimating requirements for subsidized contraceptives. Commercial Market Strategies, Washington D.C.: 2002; Foreit KGF. Use of commercial and government sources of family planning and maternal and child health care. Working paper no. 4. Futures Group International, POLICY Project, Washington D.C.: 1999;
39. and Rosen J, Conly S. Getting down to business: expanding the private commercial sector's role in meeting reproductive health needs. Population Action International, Washington D.C.: 1999.
40. Foreit KGF, Levine RE. Cost recovery and user fees in family planning. Policy Paper No. 5. Options for Population Policy, Washington D.C.: 1993;
41. Litvack JI, Bodart C. User fees plus quality equals improved access to health care: results of a field experience in Cameroon. Social Science and Medicine. 1993;37(3):369-383;
42. and Lavy V, Germain J. Tradeoffs in cost, quality, and accessibility in utilization of health facilities: insights from Ghana, in: Shaw PR, Ainsworth M, eds. Financing Health Services through user fees and insurance: case studies from sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank discussion paper no. 294. World Bank, Washington D.C.: 1996.
43. Matheny G. Family Planning Programs: Getting the Most for the Money. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2004;30(3):134-138.
44. Stover J, Heaton L. Costs of contraceptive social marketing programs implemented through the SOMARC III Project. The Futures Group International, Washington D.C.: 1998.
45. Brinkley G, Walsh J, and Mitchell B. The allocation of resource within international family planning programs. Bay Area International Group, University of California, Berkeley: 2003.
46. Finkle C. Ensuring contraceptive supply security. Outlook. 2003;2(3):1-8.
47. Gillespie D, Radloff S. Persistent inequalities in reproductive health services, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Global Health Council. Washington D.C.: May 27-30, 2003.
48. Smith J, Rizenthaler R, Mumford E. Policy lessons learned in finance and private sector participation. Working Paper Series No. 2. The Futures Group International POLICY Project, Washington, DC: 1998.
49. Mayhewn S, Lush L, Cleland J, Walt G. Implementing the integration of component services for reproductive health. Studies in Family Planning 2000; 31(2): 151-162.
50. Tuoane M, Madise NJ, Diamond I. Provision of family planning services in Lesotho. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2004; 30(2): 77-86.
51. Speizer I, Hotchkiss D, Magnani R, Hubbard B, Nelson K. Do service providers in Tanzania unnecessarily restrict clients' access to contraceptive methods? International Family Planning Perspectives. 2000; 26(1): 13-20.
52. Stanback J, Thompson A, Hardee K, Janowitz B. Menstruation requirements: a significant barrier to contraceptive access in developing countries. Studies in Family Planning 1997; 28(3): 245-250.
53. Twum-Baah KA, Stanback J. Provider rationales for restrictive family planning service practices in Ghana. Final report. Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC: 1995.
54. Blanc A, Curtis S, Croft T. Monitoring contraceptive continuation: links to fertility outcomes and quality of care. Studies in Family Planning 2002; 23(2): 127-140.
55. Clements S, Madise N. Who is being served least by family planning providers? A study of modern contraceptive use in Ghana, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe. African Journal of Reproductive Health 2004; 8(2): 124-136.