The effectiveness of brief personalized normative feedback in reducing alcohol-related problems amongst University students: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BMC Public Health

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Moreira, Teresa ^a   Foxcroft, David R ^a  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ALCOHOLISM; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STUDENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITY;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOL-RELATED DISORDERS; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; STUDENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 42249091353     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-113     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Global Burden of Disease study. WHO, Geneva: World Health Organisation 2001
2. Global Status Report: Alcohol and Young People. D Jernigan, Geneva: World Health Organization 2001 57
3. In praise of feedback: an effective intervention for college students who are heavy drinkers. ST Walters, Journal of American College Health 2000 48 235 238 10778024
4. Social Norms and the Prevention of Alcohol Misuses in Collegiate Contexts. HW Perkins, Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2002 14 164 172 12022722
5. Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in University or College students (Protocol). T Moreira D Foxcroft, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007 4 CD006748 006710.001002/14651858.CD14006748
6. Assessment may conceal therapeutic benefit: findings from a randomized controlled trial for hazardous drinking. K Kypri J Langley J Saunders M Cashell-Smith, Addiction 2007 102 1 62 70 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01632.x 17207124
7. An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment. D Spiegelhalter J Myles D Jones K Abrams, BMJ 1999 319 508 512 10454409
8. Bayesian estimates of population prevalence using the AUDIT diagnostic test for alcohol abuse and dependence. D Foxcroft K Kypri V Simonite, Annual Symposium of the Society for the Study of Addiction 2007; York, Addiction, 2007
9. Web-based screening and brief intervention for hazardous drinking: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. K Kypri J Saunders S Williams R McGee J Langley M Cashell-Smith S Gallagher, Addiction 2004 99 11 1410 1417 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00847.x 15500594
10. The extent of the 'prevention paradox' in alcohol problems as a function of population drinking patterns. I Rossow A Romelsjo, Addiction 2006 101 1 84 90 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01294.x 16393194
11. D Campbell J Stanley, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1963
12. Alcohol and Drug Use Among European 17-18 Year Old Students. Data from the ESPAD Project. A Barbro H Björn B François C Marie K Anna F Anastasios M Sabrina N Alojz S Januzs T Marcis, Stockholm: Sweden.: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN) and the Pompidou Group at the Council of Europe 2007 156
13. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. CAMH, Canada 2008 http://www.camh.net/About_Addiction_Mental_Health/ Drug_and_Addiction_Information/evaluate_your_drinking.html