Start-up of the colorectal cancer screening demonstration program

Preventing Chronic Disease

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  DeGroff, Amy ^a   Holden, Debra ^b   Green, Sonya Goode ^b   Boehm, Jennifer ^a   Seeff, Laura C ^a   Tangka, Florence ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMMUNITY CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MASS SCREENING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 42149189638     PISSN: 15451151     EISSN: 21665435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States cancer statistics: 2003 incidence and mortality. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007.
2. Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, Ederer F, Geisser MS, Mongin SJ, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000;343(22):1603-7.
3. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep 1999;48(RR-11):1-40.
4. Stufflebeam DL. Evaluation models. New Dir Eval 2001;(89):1-106.
5. Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2002.
6. Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 1995.
7. Stake RE. Multiple case study analysis. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2006.
8. Bogdan RC, Biklen SK. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theories and methods. Boston (MA): Allyn and Bacon; 2007.
9. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago (IL): Aldine, 1967.
10. Krippendorf K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills (CA): SAGE Publications; 1980.
11. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 1994.
12. Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice 2000;39(3):124-30.
13. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): SAGE Publications; 1985.
14. Mathison S. Why triangulate? Educational Researcher 1988;17(2):13-7.
15. Merriam SB. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1998.
16. WISEWOMAN - Well-Integrated Screening and Evaluation for Women Across the Nation. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/wisewoman. Accessed September 10, 2007.
17. Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program. Fed Regist 2005;70(99):29747-59.
18. CDC health protection goals fact sheet: goals for the 21st century. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/about/goals/factSheet.htm. Accessed September 10, 2007.
19. Institute of Medicine. The future of the public's health in the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2003.
20. Rossi PH, Freeman HE, Lipsey MW. Evaluation: a systematic approach. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 1999.
21. Weiss CH. Evaluation. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1998.