Using a universal access reference model to identify further guidance that belongs in iso 16071

Universal Access in the Information Society

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 17-29

  Carter, Jim ^a   Fourney, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accessibility standards; Accessible system; Reference model; Universal access; Universal access reference model

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; TRANSPORTATION;

ACCESSIBLE SYSTEM; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERFACES; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; REFERENCE MODELING; TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS; UNIVERSAL ACCESS;

AIR NAVIGATION;

EID: 42149179001     PISSN: 16155289     EISSN: 16155297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10209-003-0074-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Assistive Technology Industry Association (2002) AT-IT compatibility guidelines version 1.05. http://www.atia.org/AT_Compatibility_Guidelines_v1.05.pdf. Cited 2002
2. Bergman E, Johnson E (1995) Towards accessible humancomputer interaction. In: Nielson J (ed) Advances in human computer interaction, Ablex, Norwood, NJ
3. Carter J, Fourney D (2003) The Canadian position regarding the evolution of ISO TS 16071 towards becoming an international standard. ISO TC159/SC4/WG5 document N0731
4. Disabled Peoples International (1993) Constitution of disabled peoples international. http://www.dpi.org/en/about_us/constitution.htm. Cited 1993
5. European Co-operation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (1999) The current situation concerning potential alleviations to identified barriers. http://www.stakes.fi/cost219/COSB220.html. Cited 1999
6. Gaines B, Shaw M (1986) A learning model for forecasting the future of information technology. Fut Comp Sys 1(1):31–70
7. Inclusion of Disabled and Elderly People in Telematics (2000) Basic design for all principles. http://www.stakes.fi/include/pam2.html. Cited 2000
8. Inclusion of Disabled and Elderly People in Telematics (2000) Factors affecting uptake and use of technology. http://www.stakes.fi/include/incc320.html. Cited 2000
9. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1998) ISO 9241–13—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 13: User guidance
10. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1997) ISO 9241–14—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals VDTs—Part 14: Menu dialogues
11. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1997) ISO 9241–15—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 15: Command dialogues
12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1999) ISO 9241–16—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 16: Direct manipulation dialogues
13. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1998) ISO 9241–17—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 17: Form filling dialogues 14. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2003) ISO 14915–2—Software ergonomics for multimedia user interfaces—navigation and control (Final Draft International Standard)
14. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2002) ISO 14915–3—Software ergonomics for multimedia user interfaces—media selection and combination, (Final Draft International Standard).
15. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2002) ISO TS 16071—Ergonomics of human system interaction—guidance on accessibility for human-computer interfaces
16. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2001) ISO/IEC Guide 71.2. Draft guidelines to address the needs of older persons and people with disabilities when developing standards
17. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1998) ISO/IEC JTC1 N5611 (1998) Elements of reflection on cultural and linguistic adaptability of products and standards in the field of information and communication technologies
18. Jacko J, Vitense H (2001) A review and reappraisal of information technologies within a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society 1:56–76
19. Lindgaard G (2002) Emotion, reason and the dichotomies that influence technology. http://www.carleton.ca/hotlab/hottopics/Articles/reasonandemotion.html. Cited 2002
20. Lynch G, Meads J (1986) In search of a user interface reference model: report on the SIGCHI workshop on user interface reference models. SIGCHI Bulletin 18(2):25–33
21. Maskery H, Meads J (1992) Context: in the eyes of users and in computer systems. SIGCHI Bulletin 24(2):12–21
22. Shannon C, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL
23. Stephanidis C, Savidis, A (2001) Universal access in the information society: methods, tools, and interaction technologies. Universal Access in the Information Society 1:40–55
24. Taubes G (2000) Transparent computing. http://domino.watson.ibm.com/comm/wwwr_thinkresearch.nsf/pages/coverstory100.html
25. United Nations Commission for Social Development on Disability (1993) United Nations standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities (A/RES/48/96). http://www.independentliving.org/standardrules/. Cited 1993
26. Vanderheiden G (1990) Thirty-something million: should they be exceptions? Hum Fact 32(4):383–396
27. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2002) XML accessibility guidelines. http://www.w3.org/TR/xag. Cited 2002
28. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2002) XML accessibility guidelines. http://www.w3.org/TR/xag. Cited 2002