Colonic lavage with two polyethylene glycol solutions prior to colonoscopy makes no difference: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 622-626

  Szojda, Maria M ^a,b   Kuik, Dirk J ^a   Mulder, Chris J J ^a   Felt Bersma, Richelle J F ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Polyethylene glycol preparation

Indexed keywords

MACROGOL; SULFATE;

ABDOMINAL CRAMP; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON CROHN DISEASE; COLON DIVERTICULOSIS; COLON LAVAGE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONSTIPATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFECATION HABIT; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX RATIO; TASTE; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIOPLEGIC SOLUTIONS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRRIGATION; LAXATIVES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

EID: 42149176073     PISSN: 00365521     EISSN: 15027708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00365520701843001     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Strul H, Kariv R, Leshno M, Halak A, Jakubowicz M, Santo M, et al. The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40-80 years. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:255-62.
2. de Jong AE, Morreau H, Nagengast FM, Mathus-Vliegen EMH, Kleibeuker JH, Griffioen G, et al. Prevalence of adenomas among young individuals at average risk for colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1-5.
3. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J-J, Burnand B, Vader J-P. Impact on colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: The European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378-84.
4. Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers P, Cooper S, Man R, Rutter MD, Suzuki N, et al. Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates. Endoscopy 2006;38:456-60.
5. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, Garmo de P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76-9.
6. Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas-Perez D, Gimendo-Garcia A, Grosso B, Jimenez A, Ortega J, et al. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:6161-6.
7. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen HJ, Chalasani N. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1797-802.
8. Kim WH, Cho YJ, Park JY, Min PK, Kang JK, Park IS. Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointes Endosc 2000;52:600-5.
9. Huppertz-Hauss G, Bretthauer M, Sauar J, Paulsen J, Kjellevold O, Majak B, et al. Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate in bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005;37:537-41.
10. Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R, Dehe M, Mayer G, Schneider B, et al. the Hintertux Study Group. A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*). Endoscopy 2003;35:300-4.
11. Bitoun A, Ponchon T, Barthet M, Coffin B, Dugué C, Halphen M, Norcol Group. Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution versus sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:1631-42; Epub ahead of print.
12. Di Palma JA, Brady CE. Comparison of colon cleansing methods in preparation for colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1984;86:856-60.
13. Golub RW, Kerner BA, Wise WE Jr, Meesig DM. Colonoscopic bowel preparations: which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:594-9.
14. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E, Dube C, Gregoire S, Patel D, Saloojee N, et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:544-52.
15. Felt-Bersma RJ, Kooyman G, Kuipers EJ. Colonic lavage prior to colonoscopy: comparable outcomes of two polyethyleneglycol preparations and a sodium-phosphate solution. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004;148:181-5.
16. Poon CM, Lee DW, Mak SK, Ko CW, Chan KC, Chan KW, et al. Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2002;34:560-3.
17. Tooson JD, Gates LK. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy choosing the best lavage regimen. Postgrad Med 1996;100:203-14.
18. Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR, Nogueras JJ, Daniel N, Ehrenpreis ED, et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:689-96.
19. Hwang KL, Chen WT, Hsiao KH, Chen HC, Huang TM, Chiu CM, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparation. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:7486-93.
20. Hookey LC, Depew WT, Vanner SJ. A prospective randomized trial comparing low-dose oral sodium phosphate plus stimulant laxatives with large volume polyethylene glycol solution for colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:2217-22.
21. Di Palma JA, Wolff BG, Meagher A, Cleveland M. Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2187-91.
22. Vanner SJ, MacDonald PH, Paterson WG, Prentice RS, Da Costa LR, Beck IT. Randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in preparation of the patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1990;85:422-7.
23. Church JM. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy: timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1223-5.
24. Sloots CE, Felt-Bersma RJ. Effect of bowel cleansing on colonic transit in constipation due to slow transit or evacuation disorder. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2002;14:55-61.
25. Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH, Dufrayne F, Bergman G. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing [abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2667.
26. Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:100-4.
27. Clarkston WK, Tsen TN, Dies DF, Schratz CL, Vaswani SK, Bjerregaard P. Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective comparison. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:42-8.
28. Gupta T, Mandot A, Desai D, Abraham P, Joshi A, Shah S. Comparison of two schedules (previous evening versus same morning) of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2007;39:706-9.
29. Schmidt LM, Williams P, King D, Perera D. Picoprep-3 is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:238-42.
30. Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W, Gottfried E, Ingber S, Bernstein G, et al. Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:558-62.
31. Raymond JM, Beyssac R, Capdenat E, Pineau CH, Kerjean A, Saux MC, et al. Tolerance, effectiveness and acceptability of sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution for colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Endoscopy 1996;28:555-8.
32. Goldberg PA, Madden MV, Wright JP, Powell B, Abrahams S, van Schaik DF. A study of a new osmotic purgative for colonoscopy. Is Golytely worth its salt 1995;9:329-31.