Ranking patterns, an application to refrigerants

Match

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 555-584

  Restrepo, Guillermo ^a,b   Brüggemann, Rainer ^c   Weckert, Monika ^a   Gerstmann, Silke ^a   Frank, Hartmut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE PAMPLONA   (Colombia)

^c LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY AND INLAND FISHERIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149174665     PISSN: 03406253     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Davis, G. A.; Swanson, M.; Jones, S. Comparative evaluation of chemical ranking and scoring methodologies; EPA order No. 3N-3545-NAEX, 1994.
2. Jamison, D. T.; Sandbu, M. E. WHO Ranking of health system performance. Science 2001, 293, 1595-1596.
3. Roberts, L. Ranking the rain forests. Science 1991, 251, 1559-1560.
4. Taubes, G. Measure for measure in science. Science 1993, 260, 884-886.
5. Ball, P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature 2005, 436, 900-900.
6. Shewchuk, R. M.; O'Connor, S. J.; Williams, E. S.; Savage, G. T. Beyond rankings: using cognitive mapping to understand what health care journals represent. Soc. Sci. Med. 2006, 62, 1192-1204.
7. Finkel, E. Australia's proposed U.K.-style merit ranking stirs debate. Science 2006, 312, 176.
8. Broder, A. Z.; Lempel, R.; Maghoul, F.; Pedersen, J. Efficient PageRank approximation via graph aggregation. Inf. Retrieval 2006, 9, 123-138.
9. Willett, P. Textual and chemical information retrieval: different applications but similar algorithms. Inform. Res. 2000, 5(2), URL: http://InformationR.net/ir/5-2/infres52.html (accessed Jul. 2007).
10. Kleinberg, J. M. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 1999, 46, 604-632.
11. Page, L.; Brin, S.; Motwani, R.; Winograd, T. The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. URL: http://dbpubs.stanford.edu/pub/1999-66 (accessed Jul. 2007).
12. Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA. http://www.google.com (accessed Jul. 2007).
13. Swamidass, S. J.; Baldi, P. Mathematical correction for fingerprint similarity measures to improve chemical retrieval. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 952-964.
14. Fontana, P.; Pretsch, E. Automatic spectra interpretation, structure generation, and ranking. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 614-619.
15. Wilton, D.; Willett, P.; Lawson, K.; Mullier, G. Comparison of ranking methods for virtual screening in lead-discovery programs. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 469-474.
16. Lin, T-H.; Chiu, S-H.; Tsai, K-C. Supervised feature ranking using a genetic algorithm optimized artificial neural network. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 1604-1614.
17. Brüggemann, R.; Bartel, H. G. A theoretical concept to rank environmentally significant chemicals. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 211-217.
18. Brüggemann, R.; Halfon, E.; Welzl, G.; Voigt, K.; Steinberg, C. E. W. Applying the concept of partially ordered sets on the ranking of near-shore sediments by a battery of tests. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 918-925.
19. Lerche, D.; Sørensen, P. B.; Bruggemann, R. Improved estimation of the ranking probabilities in partial orders using random linear extensions by approximation of the mutual ranking probability. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1471-1480.
20. Brüggemann, R.; Simon, U.; Mey, S. Estimation of averaged ranks by extended local partial order models. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2005, 54, 489-518.
21. Davis, G.; Fort, D.; Hansen, B.; Irwin, F.; Jones, B.; Jones, S.; Socha, A.; Wilson, R.; Haaf, B.; Gray, G.; Hoffman, B.; Swanson, M. B.; Socha, A. C. Framework for chemical ranking and scoring systems. In Chemical ranking and scoring: guidelines for relative assessment of chemicals; Swanson, M. B.; Socha, A. C., Eds.; SETAC Press: Pensacola, 1997; pp 1-30.
22. Simon, U.; Brüggemann, R.; Mey, S.; Pudenz, S. METEOR - application of a decision support tool based on discrete mathematics. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2005, 54, 623-642.
23. Voigt, K.; Brüggemann, R. Water contamination with pharmaceuticals: data availability and evaluation approach with Hasse diagram technique and METEOR. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2005, 54, 671-689.
24. Simon, U.; Brüggemann, R.; Behrendt, H.; Shulenberger, E.; Pudenz, S. METEOR: a step-by-step procedure to explore effects of indicator aggregation in multi criteria decision aiding - application to water management in Berlin, Germany. Acta hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 2006, 34, 126-136.
25. Lerche, D.; Brüggemann, R.; Sørensen, P.; Carlsen, L.; Nielsen, O. J. A comparison of partial order technique with three methods of multi-criteria analysis for ranking of chemical substances. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1086-1098.
26. Schneeweiß, C. Planung 1 - Systemanalytische und entscheidungstheoretische Grundlagen; Spinger-Verlag: Berlin, 1991.
27. Brans, J. P.; Vincke, P. H.; Mareschal, B. How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1986, 24, 228-238.
28. Opperhuizen, A.; Hutzinger, O.; Multi-criteria analysis and risk assessment. Chemosphere 1982, 11, 675-678.
29. Trotter, W. J. Combinatorics and partially ordered sets Dimension theory; The Johns Hopkins university press: Baltimore, 1992.
30. Strassert, G. Das Abwägungsproblem bei multikriteriellen Entscheidungen - Grundlagen und Lösungsansatz unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Regionalplanung; Peter Lang Frankfurt: Frankfurt am Main, 1995.
31. Brüggemann, R.; Münzer, B.; Halfon, E. An algebraic/graphical tool to compare ecosystems with respect to their pollution - the German river "Elbe" as an example - I: Hasse-diagrams. Chemosphere 1994, 28, 863-872.
32. Brüggemann, R.; Sorensen, P. B.; Lerche, D.; Carlsen, L. Estimation of averaged ranks by a local partial order model. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 618-625.
33. Brüggemann, R.; Restrepo, G.; Voigt, K. Structure-fate relationships of organic chemicals derived from the software packages E4CHEM and WHASSE. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 894-902.
34. Brüggemann, R.; Voigt, K. Stability of comparative evaluation, -example: environmental databases. Chemosphere 1996, 33, 1997-2006.
35. Matarazzo, B.; Munda, G. New approaches for the comparison of L-R fuzzy numbers: a theoretical and operational analysis. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 2001, 118, 407-418.
36. Saaty, T. L. Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2003, 145, 85-91.
37. Pruesse, G.; Ruskey, F. Generating linear extensions fast. SIAM J. Comput. 1994, 23, 373-386.
38. These features of the HDs and the corresponding drawings can be performed with WHASSE, a software programme freely available from R. B. and introduced in: Brüggemann, R.; Halfon, E.; Bücherl, C. 1995. Theoretical base of the program "Hasse", GSF-Bericht 20/95, Neuherberg.
39. Restrepo, G.; Mesa, H.; Llanos, E. J.; Villaveces, J. L. Topological study of the periodic system. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 68-75.
40. Brüggemann, R.; Voigt, K.; Restrepo, G.; Simon, U. Concept of stability fields and hot spots in ranking of environmental chemicals. J. Environ. Softw. (In press).
41. Krzanowski, W. J. Principles of multivariate analysis: A user's perspective; Oxford university press: Oxford, 2003, p 407.
42. Restrepo, G.; Weckert, W.; Brüggemann, R.; Gerstmann, S.; Frank, H. Ranking of refrigerants. Submitted to Environ. Sci. Technol.
43. Gordon, A. D. Classification; Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, 1999, p 13.
44. Restrepo, G.; Mesa, H.; Villaveces, J. L. On the topological sense of chemical sets. J. Math. Chem. 2006, 39, 363-376.
45. Kurylo, M. J.; Orkin, V. L. Determination of atmospheric lifetimes via the measurement of OH radical kinetics. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 5049-5076.
46. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Metz, B. Davidson, O. R. Bosch, P. R. Dave, R. Meyer, L. A., Eds.; Cambridge university press: Cambridge, New York, 2007.
47. Reisch, M. S. Hot times ahead for refrigerants. Chem. Eng. News 2005, 83, 23-24.