Cytogenetic and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of Leptodactylus species from rural and urban environments (Anura, Amphibia)

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 161-176

  Arruda, M P ^a   Morielle Versute, E ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Amphibia; Anthropogenic; Cytogenetic; Genetic diversity; Leptodactylidae; Random amplified polymorphic DNA

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME DNA;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CHROMOSOME 8; CHROMOSOME NOR; CYTOGENETICS; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA PROBE; FROG; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE LOCATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROCHROMATIN; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; KARYOTYPE; LEPTODACTYLUS; LEPTODACTYLUS FUSCUS; LEPTODACTYLUS LABYRINTHICUS; LEPTODACTYLUS OCELLATUS; LEPTODACTYLUS PODICIPINUS; NONHUMAN; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; RURAL AREA; SPECIES HABITAT; SURVIVAL; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION; ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENT; FROGS AND TOADS; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; HUMAN; KARYOTYPING; POPULATION GENETICS; RURAL POPULATION; URBAN POPULATION;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; LEPTODACTYLIDAE; LEPTODACTYLUS; LEPTODACTYLUS FUSCUS; LEPTODACTYLUS LABYRINTHICUS; LEPTODACTYLUS OCELLATUS; LEPTODACTYLUS PODICIPINUS;

ANIMALS; ANURA; BRAZIL; CYTOGENETICS; ENVIRONMENT; GENETICS, POPULATION; HETEROCHROMATIN; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; NUCLEOLUS ORGANIZER REGION; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; RURAL POPULATION; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 42149163062     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16765680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4238/vol7-1gmr402     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Agostinho CA (1994). Caracterização de populaçõ es de rã-pimenta Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) e avaliação de seu desempenho em cativeiro. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos.
2. Alexander MA and Eischeid JK (2001). Climate variability in regions of amphibian declines. Conserv. Biol. 15: 930-942.
3. Amaro-Ghilardi RC, Skuk G, Sá RO, Rodrigues MT, et al. (2006). Karyotypes of eight species of Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodatylidae) with a description of a new karyotype for the genus. Phyllomedusa 5: 119-133.
4. Ávila RW and Ferreira VL (2004). Riqueza e densidade de vocalizações de anuros (Amphibia) em uma área urbana de Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Zool. 21: 887-892.
5. Baldissera A Jr, Oliveira PSL and Kasahara S (1993). Cytogenetics of four Brazilian Hyla species (Amphibia-Anura) and description of a case with a supernumerary chromosome. Rev. Bras. Genet. 16: 335-345.
6. Baldo J (2002). Estudios cromossómicos de las especies argentinas del género Leptodactylus Fitzinger 1826 (Amphibia, Anura). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Baldo, JD, Argentina.
7. Bianchi NO, Bianchi M and Vidal-Rioja L (1973). Heterochromatin late replication and secondary constrictions in the chromosome complement of Leptodactylus ocellatus. J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 26: 397-403.
8. Bogart JP (1974). A Karyosystematic study of frogs in the genus Leptodactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Copeia 3: 728-737.
9. Dela Riva I and Maldonado M (1999). First record of Leptodactylus ocellatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactykudae) in Bolivia and comments on related species. Graellsia 55: 193-197.
10. Denaro L (1972). Karyotypes of Leptodactylidae anurans. J. Herpetol. 6: 71-74.
11. Dranitsina AS, Telegeev GD, Maliuta SS and Bezrukov VF (2006). Genetic diversity in populations of Gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua). Tsitol. Genet. 40: 57-62.
12. Excoffier L, Laval G and Schneider S (2005). Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1: 47-50.
13. Grandinetti L and Jacobi CM (2005). Distribuição estacional e espacial de uma taxocenose de anuros (Amphibia) em uma área antropizada em Rio Acima - MG. Lundiana 6: 21-28.
14. Green DM and Sessions SK (2007). Nomenclature of chromosomes. In: Amphibian cytogenetics and evolution (Green DM and Sessions SK, eds.). Academic Press, San Diego,
15. Hayes TB, Case P, Chui S, Chung D, et al. (2006). Pesticide mixtures, endocrine disruption, and amphibian declines: are we underestimating the impact? Environ. Health Perspect. 114 (Suppl 1): 40-50.
16. Heyer WR and Muñhoz AM (1999). Validation of Eleutherodactylus crepitans Bokermann, 1965; Notes on the types and type locality of Telatrema heterodactylum Miranda-Ribeiro, 1937; and description of a new species of Eleutherodactylus from Mato Grosso, Brazil (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 112: 1-18.
17. Hitchings SP and Beebee TJC (1998). Loss of genetic diversity and fitness in common toad (Bufo bufo) populations isolated by inimical habitat. J. Evol. Biol. 11: 269-283.
18. Hitchings SP and Beebee TJ (1997). Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation. Heredity 79 (Pt 2): 117-127.
19. Howell WM and Black DA (1980). Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia 36: 1014-1015.
20. Izecksohn E and Carvalho-e-Silva SP de (2001). Anfíbios do município do Rio de Janeiro. UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, 148.
21. Johnston B and Frid L (2002). Clearcut logging restricts the movement of terrestrial Pacific giant salamanders (Dicamptodon tenebrosus Good). Can. J. Zool. 80: 2170-2177.
22. Kaiser H, Mais C, Bolaños F and Steinlein C (1996). Chromosomal investigation of three Costa Rican frogs from the 30-chromosome radiation of Hyla with the description of a unique geographic variation in nucleolus organizer regions. Genetica 98: 95-102.
23. Kiesecker JM, Blaustein AR and Belden LK (2001). Complex causes of amphibian population declines. Nature 410: 681-684.
24. King M (1980). C-banding studies on Australian hylid frogs: secondary constriction structure and the concept of euchromatin transformation. Chromosoma 80: 191-217.
25. Larson P and Sá RO de (1998). Chondrocranial morphology of Leptodactylus larvae (Leptodactylidae: Leptodactylinae): its utility in phylogenetic reconstruction. J. Morphol. 238: 287-305.
26. Li L, Zhang J, Zhu JQ, Gu S, et al. (2006). Genetic diversity of nine populations of the black goat (Capra hircus) in Sichuan, PR China. Zoolog. Sci. 23: 229-234.
27. Lin MS, Comings DE and Alfi OS (1977). Optical studies of the interaction of 4′-6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole with DNA and metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 60: 15-25.
28. Lourenço LB, Recco-Pimentel SM and Cardoso AJ (1998). Polymorphism of the nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) in Physalaemus petersi (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) detected by silver staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosome Res. 6: 621-628.
29. Lourenço LB, Garcia PCA and Recco-Pimentel SM (2003). Cytogenetics of a new species of Paratelmatobius cardosoi group (Anura: Leptodactylidae), with the description of an apparent case of pericentric inversion. Amphibia-Reptilia 24: 47-55.
30. Makeeva VM, Belokon' MM, Maliuchenko OP and Leont'eva OA (2006). Evaluation of the state of the gene pool of natural populations of vertebrate animals inhabiting the fragmented landscape of Moscow and Moscow district (with special reference to brown frogs). Genetika 42: 628-642.
31. Marsh DM (2001). Fluctuations in amphibian populations: a meta-analysis. Biol. Conserv. 101: 327-335.
32. Masxon LR and Heyer WR (1988). Molecular systematics of the frog genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). Fieldiana Zool. 41: 1-13.
33. Medeiros LR, Rossa-Feres DC and Recco-Pimentel SM (2003). Chromosomal differentiation of Hyla nana and Hyla sanborni (Anura, Hylidae) with a description of NOR polymorphism in H. nana. J. Hered. 94: 149-154.
34. Middleton EM, Herman JR, Celarier EA, Wilkinson JW, et al. (1981). Evaluating ultraviolet radiation exposure with satellite data at sites of amphibian declines in Central and South America. Conserv. Biol. 15: 914-928.
35. Miyamoto MM (1981). Congruence among character sets in phylogenetic studies of the frog genus Leptodactylus. Syst. Zool. 30: 281-290.
36. Nei M (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
37. Odierna G, Aprea G, Capriglion T, Castellano S, et al. (2004). Evidence for chromosome and Pst I satellite DNA family evolutionary stasis in the Bufo viridis group (Amphibia, Anura). Chromosome Res. 12: 671-681.
38. Pounds JA, Bustamante MR, Coloma LA, Consuegra JA, et al. (2006). Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature 439: 161-167.
39. Ribeiro RS, Egito GTBT and Haddad FB (2005). Chave de identificação: anfíbios anuros da vertente de Jundiaí da Serra do Japi, Estado de São Paulo. Biota Neotrop. 5: 235-247.
40. Rosa C, Aguiar O Jr, Giaretta AA and Recco-Pimentel SM (2003). Karyotypic variation in the genus megaelosia (Anura, Hylodinae) with the first description of a B-chromosome in a leptodactylid frog. Copeia 1: 166-174.
41. Ruiz IR, Soma M and Becak W (1981). Nucleolar organizer regions and constitutive heterochromatin in polyploid species of the genus Odontophrynus (Amphibia, Anura). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 29: 84-98.
42. Ruiz IR, Ceis JM and Becak W (1982). Chromosomal evolution in allopatric populations of the Odontophrynus occidentalis group (Amphibia, Anura) from western Argentina. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 33: 303-311.
43. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989). Molecular cloning - a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.
44. Schmid M (1978). Chromosome banding in Amphibia. I. Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer regions in Bufo and Hyla. Chromosoma 66: 361-388.
45. Schmid M (1980). Chromosome banding in amphibia. IV. Differentiation of GC- and AT-rich chromosome regions in Anura. Chromosoma 77: 83-103.
46. Schmid M (1983). Chromosome banding in amphibia - VII analysis of the structure and variability of NORs in Anura. Chromosoma 87: 327-344.
47. Schmid M, Haaf T and Schempp W (1985). Chromosome banding in Amphibia. IX. The polyploid karyotypes of Odontophrynus americanus and Ceratophrys ornata (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Chromosoma 91: 172-184.
48. Schmid M, Steinlein C, Feichtinger W and Poot M (1993). Chromosome banding in Amphibia. XVIII. Karyotype evolution and genomic size variation in Pleurodema (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 62: 42-48.
49. Schuytema GS and Nebeker AV (1998). Comparative toxicity of diuron on survival and growth of Pacific treefrog, bullfrog, red-legged frog, and African clawed frog embryos and tadpoles. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 34: 370-376.
50. Schweizer D (1976). Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma 58: 307-324.
51. Sessions SK and Kezer J (1991). Evolutionary cytogenetics of bolitoglossine salamanders (family Plethodontidae). In: Green DMIn: Amphibian cytogenetics and evolution (Green DM and Sessions SK, eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, 89-130.
52. Silva APZ, Garcia PCA, Martins VG, Bacci M, et al. (2004). Chromosomal and molecular analyses of Leptodactylus gracilis, L. gracilis dellatini, and L. plaumanni (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Taxonomic Implications. Amphibia-Reptilia 25: 185-196.
53. Silva AP, Haddad CF and Kasahara S (1999). Nucleolus organizer regions in Physalaemus cuvievi (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with evidence of a unique case of Ag-NOR variability. Hereditas 131: 135-141.
54. Silva AP, Haddad CF and Kasahara S (2000). Chromosomal studies on five species of the genus Leptodactylus Fitzinger, 1826 (Amphibia, Anura) using differential staining. Cytobios 103: 25-38.
55. Silva AP, Haddad CF, Galassi GG and Kasahara S (2006). Multiple nucleolus organizer regions in Leptodactylus mystacinus (Amphibia, Anura) and comments on its systematic position in the L. fuscus group based on cytogenetic and molecular analyses. Genetica 127: 35-44.
56. Sinclair JH and Brown DD (1971). Retention of common nucleotide sequences in the ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid of eukaryotes and some of their physical characteristics. Biochemistry 10: 2761-2769.
57. Smith MA and Green DM (2005). Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28: 110-128.
58. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, et al. (2004). Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306: 1783-1786.
59. Sumner AT (1990). Chromosome banding. Unwin Hyman, London, 434.
60. Sumner AT (1972). A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp. Cell Res. 75: 304-306.
61. Swofford DL (2002). PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). MA: Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
62. Telles MP, Bastos RP, Soares TN, Resende LV, et al. (2006). RAPD variation and population genetic structure of Physalaemus cuvieri (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Central Brazil. Genetica 128: 323-332.
63. Viegas-Péquignot E (1992). In situ hybridization to chromosomes with biotinilated probes. In: In situ hybridization: a practical approach (Willernson D, ed.). Oxford University Press and IRL Press, Oxford, 137-158.
64. Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, et al. (1990). DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6531-6535.
65. Williams SE and Hero JM (1998). Rainforest frogs of the Australian Wet Tropics: guild classification and the ecological similarity of declining species. Proc. Biol. Sci. 265: 597-602.
66. Wynn A and Heyer WR (2001). Do geographically widespread species of tropical amphibians exist? An estimate of genetic relatedness within the Neotropical frog Leptodactylus fuscus (Schneider 1799) (Anura Leptodactylidae). Trop. Zool. 14: 255-285.
67. Yeh FC, Yang R and Boyle T (1999). POPGENE version 1.32: Microsoft Window-based freeware for population genetics analysis. University of Alberta, Edmonton. Free program distribuited by the authors at http://www.ualberta.ca/ fyeh/index.htm.
68. Zeisset I and Beebee TJ (2003). Population genetics of a successful invader: the marsh frog Rana ridibunda in Britain. Mol. Ecol. 12: 639-646.