Distributing representation for robust interpretation of dialogue utterances

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2000-October, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Milward, David ^a  

^a SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

CONTEXTUAL CONSTRAINTS; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION; STRUCTURAL CONSTRAINTS; SYNTAX TREE; TASK-ORIENTED;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 42149162624     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. H. Aust. M. Oerder. F. Siede. and V. Steinbiss. 1995. A spoken language enquiry system for automatic train timetable information. Philips Journal of Research. 49(4):399-418.
2. J. Boye. M. Wiren. M. Rayner. I. Lewin. D. Carter, and R. Becket. 1999. Language-processing strategies and mixed-initiative dialogues. In IJCAI-99 Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems.
3. D. Carter. 1997. The treebanker: a tool for supervised training of parsed corpora. In ACL Workshop on Computational Environments for Grammar Development and Linguistic Engineering. Available as SRI Cambridge Technical Report CRC-068.
4. A. Copestake. D. Flickinger. R. Malouf. S. Riehemann. and I. Sag. 1995. Translation using minimal recursion semantics. In Sixth International Conference on Theoretical and Mehodological Issues in Machine Translation. Leuven Belgium.
5. M. Egg. J. Niehren. P. Ruhrberg. and F. Xu. 1998. Constraints over lambda-structures in semantic underspecification. In COLING-AC'L '98, Montreal. Canada.
6. G. Goerz. J. Spilker. V. Strom, and H. Weber. 1999. Architectural considerations for conversational systems - the verbmobil/intarc experience. In First International Workshop on Human Computer Conversation. Bellagio. Italy.
7. J. Hobbs. 1983. An improper treatment of quantification in ordinary english. In 21st Annual Meeting of the ACL. Cambridge. Mass.
8. W. Kasper. B. Kiefer. H.U. Krieger. C. J. Rupp. and K.L. Worm. 1999. Charting the depths of robust speech processing. In Proceedings of the 37th ACL.
9. I. Lewin. R. Becket. J. Boye. D. Carter. M. Rayner. and M. Wiren. 1999. Language processing for spoken dialogue systems: is shallow parsing enough? In ESCA ETRW Workshop on Accessing information in Spoken Audio, Cambridge. Available as SRI Cambridge Technical Report CRC-074.
10. M. Marcus. D. Hindle. and M. Fleck. 1983. D-theory: Talking about talking about trees. In 21-st Annual Meeting of the ACL. pages 129-136r Cambridge. Mass.
11. S. Miller. D. Stallard. R. Bobrow. and R. Schwartz. 1996. A fully statistical approach to natural language interfaces. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 55-6 L University of California.
12. D. Milward. 1994. Dynamic dependency grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy. 17:561-605.
13. D. Milward. 1999. Towards a robust semantics for dialogue using flat structures. In Amstelogue '99. Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. volume II. University of Amsterdam.
14. R. C. Moore and H. Alshawi. 1992. Syntactic and semantic processing. In The Core Language Engine. pages 129-146. MIT Press.
15. M. Pinkal. 1995. Radical underspecification. In 10th Amsterdam Colloquium, volume III. pages 587-606.
16. U. Reyle. 1993. Dealing with ambiguities by underspecification: Construction, representation and deduction. Journal of Semantics. 10:123-179.
17. A. Trujillo. 1995. Bi-lexical rules for multi-lexeme translation in lexicalist mt. In Sixth International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation. pages 48-66: Leuven Belgium.
18. G. van Noord. G. Bouma. R. Koeling. and M-J. Nederhof. 1999. Robust grammatical analysis for spoken dialogue systems. Natural Language Engineering. 5(1):45-93.