Promoting innovation and the deployment of advanced telecommunications services to businesses

Contemporary Economic Policy

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 229-247

  Gabel, David J ^a   Guang Lih Huang, Kenneth ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149157774     PISSN: 10743529     EISSN: 14657287     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00064.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Acton, J. P., and I. Vogelsang. "Introduction (to Symposium on Price Cup Regulation)." Rand Journal of Economics, 20, 1989, 372.
2. Averch, H., and L. L. Johnson. "Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint." American Economic Review, 52, 1962, 1052 69.
3. Bourreau, M., and P. Dog̀an. "Regulation and Innovation in the Telecommunications Industry." Telecommunications Policy, 25, 2001, 174 78.
4. Carlton, D. W., and J. M. Perloff. Modern Industrial Organization. New York : Addison-Wesley Press, 2000.
5. Commerce Capital Markets. "The Status of 271 and UNE-Platform in the Regional Bells' Territories." 8 November 2002.
6. Crandall, R. W. "Managed Competition in U.S. Telecommunications. " AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Working Paper No. 99-1, 1999.
7. Crandall, R. W., and J. A. Hausman. "Competition in US Telecommunications Service: Effects of the 1996 Legislation," in Deregulation of Network Industries: What's Next, edited by S. Peltzman and C. Winston. Washington, D.C AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 2000, 73 112.
8. Credit Market: Drop in Global Interest Rates Seen New York Times. 3 December 1990, p. D7.
9. Credit Market: Drop in Global Interest Rates Seen New York Times. The Markets: Stocks and Bonds: Share Prices Advance on Prospects of a Year-End Rally 18 December 2001, p. C9.
10. Crockett, R. O. "How to Get U.S. Broadband Up to Speed." Business Week, 8 September 2003. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/ 03_36/b3848084_mz063.htm. [accessed Oct 2003]
11. Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein Securities. "UNE-P: the Un-Profit: Regulation Pressuring RBOC Profits." 21 August 2002.
12. Gabel, D., and J. Nix. "Regulatory Assessment of Investments in Telephone and Electric Utilities." Law and Policy, 15, 1993, 123 37.
13. Greenstein, S. M., S. McMaster, and P. T. Spiller. "The Effect of Incentive Regulation on Infrastructure Modernization: Local Exchange Companies' Deployment of Digital Technology." Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 4, 1995, 187 236.
14. Greenwald, B. C., and W. W. Sharkey. "The Economics of Deregulation of Local Exchange Telecommunications." Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1, 1989, 325.
15. Gregg, B. J. "Survey of Unbundled Network Element Prices in the United States (Updated 1 January 2002)." 2002. http://www.cad.state.wv.us/ Intro%20to%20Matrix%201-02.htm. [accessed Feb 2002]
16. InternetWeek.com. "Frame Relay: Still Your WAN Workhorse." 22 December 1997. http://www.internetwk.com/trends/1222a.htm. [accessed Dec 2001]
17. Jorde, T. J., G. Sidak, and D. Teece. "Innovation, Investment, and Unbundling." Yale Journal on Regulation, 17, 2000, 1 38.
18. Kahn, A. E., T. J. Tardiff, and D. L. Weisman. "The Telecommunications Act at Three Years: An Economic Evaluation of its Implementation by the Federal Communications Commission." Information Economics and Policy, 11, 1999, 346.
19. Kamien, M. I., and N. L. Schwartz. Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press, 1982.
20. Kridel, D., D. E. M. Sappington, and D. L. Weisman. "The Effects of Incentive Regulation in the Telecommunications Industry: A Survey." Journal of Regulatory Economics, 9, 1996, 269 306.
21. Legg Mason Telecom Research Group. Reshaping Rural Telephone Markets: Financial Perspectives on Integrating Acquired Access Lines. Baltimore, MD : Legg Mason Wood Walker Inc, 2001.
22. National Exchange Carrier Association. Tariff 4 Report - "Wire Center and Interconnection Information: Mileage Measurement," issued on 17 August 1999, by the Director of Access Tariffs and Access Planning.
23. National Exchange Carrier Association. "Tariff No. 4." December 2001. http://www.neca.org/source/NECA_951.asp accessed Jan 2002 3 December 1990, p. D7.
24. New York Times. "The Markets: Stocks and Bonds: Share Prices Advance on Prospects of a Year-End Rally." 18 December 2001, p. C9.
25. Paltridge, S. "The Development of Broadband Access in OECD Countries." OECD Report for the Working Party on Telecommunications and Information Services Policy, 2001, DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2001)2/FINAL. http://www.oecdwash.org/DATA/online.htm. [accessed Jan 2002]
26. Prieger, J. E. "The Supply Side of the Digital Divide: Is There Equal Availability in the Broadband Internet Access Market?" Economic Inquiry, 41, 2003, 346 63.
27. Staiger, D., and J. H. Stock. "Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments." Econometrica, 65, 1997, 557 86.
28. UBS Warburg. "How Much Pain from UNE-P? Analysis of UNE-P Economics for the Bells." 20 August 2002.
29. Wall Street Journal. 9 April 2004. http://online.wsj.com/article/0. BT_CO_20040409_001743.00.html.
30. Willig, R. D., W. H. Lehr, J. P. Bigelow, and S. B. Levinson. "Stimulating Investment and the Telecommunications Act of 1996." Unpublished Manuscript, 2002.
31. Plaintiff's First Statement of Contentions and Proof, United States of America, Plaintiff, v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, November 1, 1978, Civil Action 74-1698, US District Court for the District of Columbia, p. 3.
32. Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 01-1076, 28 December 2001.
33. Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996); codified at 47 U.S.C. §151 et seq.
34. U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. Circuit No. 00-1012, (argued 28 January 2004, Decided 2 March 2004) USTA v. FCC and USA Respondents Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies et al. (D.C. Cir. 2004).
35. USTA v. FCC, 290 F.3d 415, 425 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
36. Federal Communications Commission. In the Matter of Represcribing the Authorized Rate of Return for Interstate Services of Local Exchange Carriers, CC Docket No. 89-624. 21 December 1990, 5 FCC Rcd 7507; 1990 FCC LEXIS 6429.
37. Federal Communications Commission. In the Matter of Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("Interconnection Order"), First Report and Order, 8 August 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, FCC 96-325, pars. 10-15, and 29.
38. Federal Communications Commission. In the Matter of Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 98-146, FCC 99-5, Released 2 February 1999 par. 2.
39. Federal Communications Commission. In the Matter of Access Charge Reform (CC Docket No. 96-262), Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers (CC Docket No. 94-1), Low-Volume Long-Distance Users (CC Docket No. 99-249), and Federal-State Joint Board On Universal Service (CC Docket No. 96-45). Sixth Report and Order in CC Docket Nos. 96-262 and 94-1, Report and Order in CC Docket No. 99-249, Eleventh Report and Order in CC Docket No. 96-45. Adopted : 31 May 2000, Released: 31 May 2000.
40. Federal Communications Commission. In the Matter of Cost Review Proceeding for Residential and Single-Line Business Subscriber Line Charge (SLC) Caps, Access Charge Reform (CC Docket No. 96-262), Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers (CC Docket No. 94-1) FCC 02-161, Released 5 June 2002 par. 9.
41. Federal Communications Commission. In the Matter of Review of the Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, CC Docket No. 01-338, Released 21 August 2003a.
42. Federal Communications Commission. In the Matter of Review of the Commission's Rules Regarding the Pricing of Unbundled Network Elements and the Resale of Service by Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, WC Docket No. 03-173, FCC 03-224, 15 September 2003b, at pars. 5 and 51.
43. Maine Public Utilities Commission. Staff Comments, 31 August 1990, in Re: Incentive Regulation for Telecommunications Utilities, Docket No. 89-397.
44. Maine Public Utilities Commission. Investigation Into Regulatory Alternatives for the New England Telephone and Telegraph Company d/b/a NYNEX, 15 May 1995, slip op., Sec. III.A.7.
45. SBC Communications Inc. Reply Comments, In the Matter of Review of the Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, CC Docket No. 01-338, 17 July 2002.