Developing a knowledge management platform for automotive build-to-order production network

Human Systems Management

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 15-30

  Smirnov, Alexander ^a   Shilov, Nikolay ^a   Kashevnik, Alexey ^a  

^a ST PETERSBURG INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS AND AUTOMATION   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Build to order production network; Competence profile; Context; Knowledge management; Ontology

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; DECISION MAKING; ONTOLOGY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; TOPOGRAPHY;

BUILD TO ORDER PRODUCTION NETWORKS; COMPETENCE PROFILES; SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 42149144730     PISSN: 01672533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. A.K. Dey, D. Salber and G.D. Abowd, A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications, in: Context-Aware Computing: A Special Triple Issue of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 16, T.P. Moran and P. Dourish, eds, Lawrence-Erlbaum, 2001, URL: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fce/ctk/pubs/HCIJ16.pdf.
2. A.P. Vrechopoulos, K.C. Pramataris and G.I. Doukidis, Utilizing information processing for enhancing value: towards a model for supporting business and consumers within an Internet retailing environment, in: Proceedings of 12th International Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, Bled, Slovenia, 1999.
3. A. Smirnov, M. Pashkin, N. Chilov and T. Levashova, Knowledge logistics in information grid environment, International Journal on Future Generation Computer Systems (special issue "Semantic Grid and Knowledge Grid: The Next-Generation Web", H. Zhuge, ed.) 20(1) (2004), 61-79.
4. B. Chandrasekaran, J.R. Josephson and V.R. Benjamins, Ontology of tasks and methods, in: Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW'98), 1998, URL: http://spuds.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW98/chandra/.
5. B. Chandrasekaran, J.R. Josephson and V.R. Benjamins, What are ontologies, and why do we need them?, IEEE Intelligent Systems & Their Applications 14(1) (1999), 20-26.
6. Practical Tools and Methods for Corporate Knowledge Management - Sharing and Capitalising Engineering Know-How in the Concurrent Enterprise (CORMA), 2005, URL: http://www.corma.net/.
7. D. Fensel, I. Horrocks and F. van Harmelen, Ontology Language. On-to-knowledge: Content-driven knowledge management tools through evolving ontologies, Version 1, Deliverable 1, Technical report, 2000, URL: http://www.ontoknowledge.org/countd/countdown.cgi?del1.pdf.
8. D. Ramachandran, P. Reagan and K. Goolsbey: First-orderized ResearchCyc: Expressiveness and efficiency in a common sense knowledge base, in: AAAI-05 Workshop on Contexts and Ontologies, Pittsburg, PA, USA, 2005, URL: http://magma.cs.uiuc.edu/deepak/CO05-FORCyc.pdf.
9. E. Compatangelo and S. Derek, K-ShaRe: Knowledge sharing and reuse in AKT, Technical report, Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, UK, 2001, URL: http://eprints.aktors.org/secure/00000149/01/Comp-Slee_AUCS- TR0103.pdf.
10. F. Giunchiglia, Contextual reasoning, in: IJCAI'93 Workshop on Using Knowledge in Its Context, Chambéry, France, 1993, pp. 39-49.
11. G. Stone, J. Miemczyk and R. Esser, Making build to order a reality: The 5-day car initiative, in: Strengthening Competitiveness through Production Networks (a prospective from European ICT research, projects in the field of "Enterprise Networking"), European Communities, 2005, pp. 26-37.
12. h-TechSight, 2006, URL: http://prise-serv.cpe.surrey.ac.uk/techsight/, http://www.etse.urv.es/~dr.ianyo/hTechSight/projecte.html.
13. I. Horrocks, DAML+OIL: A description logic for the semantic web, IEEE Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering 25(1) (2002), 4-9.
14. I. Horrocks, DAML+OIL: A reasonable web ontology language, in: Proceedings of the Eight Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT 2002), LNCS, Vol. 2287, Springer, 2002, pp. 2-13.
15. I. Lesser and K. Burner, Knowledge and the supply chain, Inside Supply Management 16(4) (2005), 12.
16. IBM, corporate Web-site, What is BI?, 2003, URL: http://www-1.ibm.com/ servers/solutions/bi/what.html.
17. Intelligent CONtent Management System (ICONS) project, 2006, URL: http://www.icons.rodan.pl/.
18. IEEE SUO Project Number P1600.1: Standard Upper Ontology, 2006, URL: http://suo.ieee.org/.
19. ILIPT, Intelligent Logistics for Innovative Product Technologies, Web-site, 2006, URL: http://www.ilipt.org.
20. INRIA Knowledge Management Platform (KmP) project, 2005, URL http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/soft/kmp.html.
21. J.-Ch. Pomerol and P. Brézillon, Context proceduralization in decision making, in: CONTEXT 2003, Stanford, CA, USA, P. Blackbum et al., eds, LNAI, Vol. 2680, 2003, pp. 491-498.
22. J.-Ch. Pomerol, P. Brézillon and L. Pasquier, Operational knowledge representation for practical decision making, in: Thirty-Fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-34), Maui, HI, USA, 2001.
23. J. Davies, A. Duke and A. Stonkus, OntoShare: Using ontologies for knowledge sharing, in: Proceedings of the WWW2002 Semantic Web Workshop, 11th International WWW Conference WWW2002, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2002, URL: http://se.manticweb2002.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/proceedings/Research/davies.pdf.
24. J. Sowa, Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical and Computational Foundation, PWS Publishing Comp., Boston, 1998.
25. Knowledge Driven Business Operating System (kBOS), 2006, URL: http://www.kbos.net/.
26. L. Pasquier, P. Brézillon and J.-Ch. Pomerol, From representation of operational knowledge to practical decision making in operations, in: Decision Support Through Knowledge Management, S. Carlsson et al., eds, Akademitryck AB, Edsbruk, Sweden, 2000, pp. 301-320.
27. M. Doerr, J. Hunter and C. Lagoze, Towards a core ontology for information integration, Journal of Digital Information 4(1) (2003), electronic journal, URL: http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v04/i01/ Doerr/doerr-final.pdf.
28. M. Musen, Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse, Computers and Biomedical Research 25 (1992), 435-467.
29. M. Theodorakis, A. Analyti, P. Constantopoulos and N. Spyratos, Contextualization as an abstraction mechanism, for conceptual modeling, in: 18th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'99), Paris, France, November 1999, pp. 475-489.
30. M. Uschold, R. Jasper and P. Clark, Three approaches for knowledge sharing: A comparative analysis, in: Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling, and Management (KAW'99), Banff, AB, Canada, 1999, URL: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/pclark/papers/kaw99.ps.Z.
31. N. Guarino, Formal ontology and information systems, in: Proceedings of FOIS'98, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1998, pp. 3-15.
32. N. Guarino, Some organizing principles for a unified top-level ontology, Working Notes of AAAI Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering, Stanford, 1997.
33. N. Guarino, Some ontological principles for designing upper level lexical resources, in: Proceedings of First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, A. Rubio, N. Gallardo, R. Castro and A. Tejada, eds, ELRA - European Language Resources Association, Granada, Spain, 1998, pp. 527-534.
34. N. Zhong, J. Liu and Y. Yao, In search of the wisdom web, Computer 35 (2002), 27-31.
35. Ontotext, The KIM Platform for Knowledge & Information Management, 2006, URL: http://www.ontotext.com/kim/index.html.
36. P. Bouquet, F. Giunchiglia, F. van Harmelen, L. Serafini and H. Stuckenschmidt, C-OWL: Contextualizing ontologies, in: 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Sanibel Island, FL, USA, 2003, pp. 164-179.
37. R. Neches, R. Fikes, T. Finin, T. Gruber, R. Patil, T. Senator and W Swartout, Enabling technology for knowledge sharing, AIMagazine 12(3) (1991), 36-56.
38. R. Ruggaber, Interoperability of enterprise systems and applications, in: Strengthening Competitiveness through Production Networks (a perspective from European ICT research projects in the field of "Enterprise Networking"), European Communities, 2005, pp. 58-70.
39. R.V. Guha, Contexts: A formalization and some applications, MCC Technical report, ACT-CYC-423-91, December, 1991.
40. R.V. Guha and D.B. Lenat, Cyc: A Mid-Term Report, MCC and Stanford University, 1990, URL: http://www.cyc.com/tech-reports/act-cyc-134-90/act-cyc- 134-90.html.
41. R.V. Guha, Context dependence of representations in CYC, in: Colloque ICO'93, Montréal, May 1993.
42. Semantic Web, Web site, 2006, URL: http://www.semanticweb.org.
43. Service-oriented architecture (SOA) definition, 2007, URL: http://www.service-architecture.com/web-services/articles/service- oriented_architecture_soa_definition.html.
44. T.J. Sturgeon, How do we define value chains and production networks?, MIT IPC Globalization Working Paper 00-010, 2000.
45. T.R. Gruber and G.R. Olsen, An ontology for engineering mathematics, Morgan Kaufmann, Gustav Stresemann Institut, Bonn, Germany, Stanford University, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Technical Report KSL-94-18, 1994, URL: ftp://ftp.ksl.stanford.edu/pub/KSL_Reports/KSL-94-18.ps.
46. The Upper Cyc Ontology, 1997, URL: http://www.cyc.com/cyc-2-1/toc.html.
47. Unicorn system, 2005, URL: http://unicorn.com/.
48. V.R. Benjamins and D. Fensel, Community is knowledge!, in: Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW'98), Banff, AB, Canada, 1998, URL: http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/ KAW98/benjamins1/.
49. V.R. Benjamins, D. Fensel, S. Decker and A. Gomez Perez, (KA)2: Building ontologies for the Internet: A mid term report, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 51 (1999), 687-712.
50. W. Sen, Y.W. Shin, A. Kumar and R. Piplani, Supply chain demand response strategy evaluation and optimization, in: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, 2000 (ICMIT 2000), Singapore, Vol. 2, 2000, pp. 782-787.
51. W3C: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, 2006, URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
52. Web Services explained, 2007, URL: http://www.service-architecture.com/ web-services/articles/web_services_explained.html.