Social and environmental reporting in UK company law and the issue of legitimacy

Corporate Governance

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 128-140

  Williamson, David ^a   Lynch Wood, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Company law; Corporate social responsibility; Stakeholder analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149130965     PISSN: 14720701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14720700810863760     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Accounting Standards Board (2005), Reporting Standard 1 - Operating and Financial Review, ASB Publications, London.
2. Beetham, D. (1991), The Legitimation of Power, Macmillan, London.
3. Campbell, D., Craven, B. and Shrives, P. (2003), "Voluntary social reporting in three FSTE sectors: a comment on perception and legitimacy", Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 558-81.
4. Carroll, A. (1979), "A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 497-505.
5. Chamberlain, N. (1973), The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, Basic Books, New York, NY.
6. Company Law Review Steering Group (2001), "Modern company law for a competitive economy", final report, Company Law Review Steering Group, London.
7. Deegan, C. (2002), "The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures: a theoretical foundation", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 282-311.
8. Deegan, C. and Rankin, M. (1996), "Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosure by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Agency", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 50-67.
9. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2006), "Environmental key performance indicators: reporting guidelines for UK business", available at: www.defra.gov.uk/environment/business/envrp/ envkpi-guidelines.pdf.
10. Department of Trade and Industry (1999), "Modern company law for a competitive economy: the strategic framework, a consultation document from The Company Law Review Steering Group", available at: www.dti.gov.uk/files/ file23279.pdf.
11. Department of Trade and Industry (2000a), "Modern company law for a competitive economy: developing the framework", available at: www.dti.gov.uk/bbf/co-law-reform-bill/clr-review/page25086.html.
12. Department of Trade and Industry (2000b), "Modern company law for a competitive economy: completing the structure", available at: www.dti.gov.uk/bbf/co-law-reform-bill/clr-review/page25080.html.
13. Department of Trade and Industry (2001), Business and Society: Developing Corporate Social Responsibility in the UK, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
14. Department of Trade and Industry (2002), Modernising Company Law, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
15. Department of Trade and Industry (2004a), Corporate Social Responsibility: A Government Update, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
16. Department of Trade and Industry (2004b), Draft Regulations on the Operating and Financial Review and Directors' Report: A Consultative Document, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
17. Department of Trade and Industry (2005), "Company law reform", available at: www.dti.gov.uk/files/file13958.pdf.
18. Donaldson, T. (1982), Corporations and Morality, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
19. Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975), "Organisational legitimacy: social values and organisational behaviour", Pacific Sociological Review, January, pp. 122-36.
20. Environment Agency (2006), "Environmental disclosures: first 100 FTSE all-share companies to report under the new company law reporting requirements", available at: http://publications.environmentagency.gov.uk/ pdf/GEHO1106BLOL-e-e.pdf.
21. European Commission (2001), "Promoting a European framework for corporate social reasonability", green paper, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
22. European Commission (2002), "Corporate social responsibility: a business contribution to sustainable development", European Commission, Brussels.
23. Friedman, M. (1968), The Methodology of Positive Economics, Macmillan, New York, NY.
24. Friedman, M. (1970), "Social responsibility of business is to increase its profits", The New York Times Magazine, No. 13, pp. 122-6.
25. Goddard, R. (2003), "Modernising company law: the government's white paper", Modern Law Review, Vol. 66 No. 3, pp. 402-24.
26. Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995), "Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 47-77.
27. Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. (1989), "Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory", Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 19, pp. 343-52.
28. Hogner, R. (1982), "Corporate social reporting: eight decades of development at US steel", Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 4, pp. 243-50.
29. Lindblom, C. (1994), "The implications of organisational legitimacy for corporate social performance and legitimacy", Proceedings of the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, NY.
30. Maltby, J. (1997), "Setting its own standards and meeting those standards: voluntarism versus regulation in environmental reporting", Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 6, pp. 83-92.
31. Mobus, J. (2005), "Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory context", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 492-517.
32. Moerman, L. and Van Der Laan, S. (2005), "Social reporting in the tobacco industry: all smoke and mirrors", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 374-89.
33. Neu, D., Warsame, H. and Pedwell, K. (1998), "Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in environmental reports", Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 265-82.
34. O'Donovan, G. (2002), "Environmental disclosures in the annual report: extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 344-71.
35. Oliver, C. (1991), "Strategic responses to institutional processes", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 145-79.
36. Owen, D., Swift, T. and Hunt, K. (2001), "Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting", Accounting Forum, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 264-82.
37. Shocker, A. and Sethi, S. (1974), "An approach to incorporating social preferences in developing corporate action strategies", in Sethi, S. (Ed.), The Unstable Ground: Corporate Social Policy in a Dynamic Society, John Wiley & Sons, Melville, CA.
38. Steiner, G. and Steiner, J. (1997), Business, Government and Society: A Managerial Perspective, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
39. Suchman, M. (1995), "Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 571-610.
40. Swift, T. (2001), "Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders", A European Review, No. 10, pp. 16-26.
41. Utting, P. (2004), "Engaging SMES in corporate social responsibility: towards a fair agenda", Paper No. 23, Working Party on Industry and Enterprise Development, Expert meeting on Good Governance for SMEs.
42. Wilmshurst, T. and Frost, G. (2000), "Corporate environmental reporting: a test of legitimacy theory", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 10-26.
43. Wiseman, J. (1972), "An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports", Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 53-63.
44. Woodward, D., Edwards, P. and Birkin, F. (2001), "Some evidence on executives' views of corporate social responsibility", British Accounting Review, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 357-97.