Xenoderm versus 'conventional' treatment in pediatrics burns

International Journal of Pharmacology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 46-50

  Hosseini, Seyed Nejat ^a   Mousavinasab, Seyed Nouraddin ^b   Rahmanpour, Haleh ^c   Shoghli, Alireza ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZANJAN   (Iran)

^b ZANJAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c ZANJAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Biological dressing; Burns; Pediatrics; Xenoderm

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; SULFADIAZINE SILVER;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BURN; BURN DRESSING; CHILD; CHILD CARE; CHILDHOOD MORTALITY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFANT; IRAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SPLIT THICKNESS SKIN GRAFT;

EID: 42149112252     PISSN: 18117775     EISSN: 18125700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/ijp.2008.46.50     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Albertyn, R., S.W. Bickler and H. Rode, 2006. Paediatric burn injuries in Sub Saharan Africa: An overview. Burns, 32 (5): 605-612.
2. Barret, J.P., P. Dziewulski, P.I. Ramzy, S.E. Wolf, M.H. Desai and D.N. Herndon, 2000. Biobrane versus 1% silver sulfadiazine in second-degree pediatric burns. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 105 (1): 62-65.
3. Becker, D., 1998. Temporary wound dressing of burns with fresh, sterile, frozen porcine skin. Ann. Burns and Fire Disasters, 10 (3): 171-175.
4. Brunicardi, F.C., D.K. Andersen, T.R. Billiar, D.L. Dunn, J.G. Hunter and R.E. Pollock, 2005. Schwartz's Principles of Surgery. 8th Edn. McGraw-Hill, pp: 189-221.
5. Burleson, R. and B. Eiseman, 1972. Nature of the bond between partial-thickness skin and wound granulations. Surgery, 72 (2): 315-322.
6. Chiu, T. and M. Shah, 2002. Porcine xenograft dressing for facial burns: Beware of the mesh imprint. Burns, 28 (3): 279-282.
7. Chiu, T. and A. Burd, 2005. Xenograft dressing in the treatment of burns. Clin. Dermatol., 23 (4): 419-423.
8. Costagliola, M. and M. Agorsi, 2005. Second-degree burns: A comparative, multicenter, randomized trial of hyaluronic acid plus silver sulfadiazine vs. silver sulfadiazine alone. Curr. Med. Res., 21 (8): 1235-1240.
9. Davy, R.B., 1999. The changing face of burn care: The Adelaide Children's Hospital Burn Unit: 1960-1996 Burns, 25 (1): 62-68.
10. Elliot, R.A. and J.G. Hoehn, 1973. Use of commercial porcine skin for wound dressing. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 52 (4): 401-405.
11. Erickson, E.J., S.W. Merrell, J.R. Saffle and J.J. Sullivan, 1991. Differences in mortality from thermal injury between pediatric and adult patients. J. Pediatr. Surg., 26 (7): 821-825.
12. Goldman, S., L. Aharonson-Daniel and K. Peleg, 2006. Israel Truma Group (ITG). Childhood burns in Israel: A 7-year epidemiological review. Burns, 32 (4): 467-472.
13. Ho, W.S. and S.Y. Ying, 2001. An epidemiological study of 1063 hospitalized burn patients in a tertiary burns centre in Hong Kong. Burns, 27 (2): 119-123.
14. Hosseini, S.N., S.N. Mousavinasab and M. Fallahnezhat 2007. Xenoderm dressing in the treatment of second degree burns. Burns, 33 (6): 776-781.
15. Kiene, S., H. Schill, J. Roewer and U. Frick, 1976. Lyophilized split pigskin as Biological wound dressings, original treatises: Zentralbl Chir, 101 (24): 1481-1494.
16. Klein, L., P. Mericka and J. Preis, 1995. Clinical Experience With Skin Xenografts in Burned Patients. In: The Management of Burns and Fire Disasters, Masellis, M. and S.W.A. Gunn (Eds.). Perspectives 2000. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Frick U, pp: 337-345.
17. Kumar, P., P.T. Chirayil and R. Chittoria, 2000. Ten years epidemiological study of paediatric burns in Manipal, India. Burns, 26 (3): 261-264.
18. Kumar, R.J., R.M. Kimble, R. Boots and S.P. Pegg, 2004. Treatment of partial-thickness burns: A prospective, randomized trial using Transcyte. ANZ. J. Surg., 74 (8): 622-626.
19. Lukish, J.R., M.R. Eichelberger, K.D. Newman, M. Pao, K. Nobuhara, M. Keating, N. Golonka, G. Pratsch, V. Misra, E. Valladares, P. Johnson, J.C. Gilbert, D.M. Powell and G.E. Hartman, 2001. The use of a bioactive skin substitute decreases length of stay for pediatric burn patients. J. Pediatr. Surg., 36 (8): 1118-1121.
20. Maghsoudi, H. and N. Samnia, 2005. Etiology and outcome of pediatric burns in Tabriz, Iran. Burns, 31 (6): 721-725.
21. May, S.R., 1991. The effect of biological wound dressing on the healing process. Clin. Mater., 8 (3-4): 243-249.
22. Paddock, H.N., R. Fabia, S. Giles, J. Hayes, W. Lowell, D. Adams and G.E. Besner, 2007. A silver-impregnated antimicrobial dressing reduces hospital costs for pediatric burn patients. J. Pediatr. Surg., 42 (1): 211-213.
23. Potokar, T., 2005. Paediatric burn injuries-tomorrow is too late. Burns, 31 (4): 401.
24. Pruitt, B.A. and N.S. Levine, 1984. Characteristics and uses biologic dressing and skin substitutes. Arch. Surg., 119 (3): 312-322.
25. Rawlins, J.M., A.A. Khan, A.F. Shenton and D.T. Sharpe, 2007. Epidemiology and outcome analysis of 208 children with burns attending an emergency department. Pediatr. Emerg. Care, 23 (5): 289-293.
26. Schmitt, W., 1973. Die Lokalbehandlung der Verbrennungswunden. Zbl. Chir, 98: 320-324.
27. Townsend, C.M., R.D. Beuchamp, B.M. Evers and K.L. Mattox, 2004. Textbook of Surgery, The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice. 17th Edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp: 580-585.
28. Xin, W., Z. Yin, Z. Qin, L. Jian, P. Tanuseputro, M. Gomez, M. Beveridge and L. Zhenjiang, 2006. Characteristics of 1494 pediatric burn patients in Shanghai. Burns, 2 (5): 613-618.