Notation and representation in collaborative object-oriented design: An observational study

Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 261-280

  Dekel, Uri ^a   Herbsleb, James D ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University

Author keywords

Collaborative software design; Modeling; Notation; OOD; Representation; UML

Indexed keywords

(1 1 1) ORIENTATION; COLLABORATIVE DESIGN TOOLS; COLLABORATIVE DESIGNS; CONTEXTUAL CUES; CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION; DESIGN INFORMATION; EVOLUTION (CO); INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; LANGUAGES (TRADITIONAL); MODELING TOOLS; OBJECT-ORIENTED DESIGN (OOD); OBJECT-ORIENTED PARADIGM (OOP); OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES; SOFTWARE DESIGNERS;

CANNING; COMPUTER SIMULATION LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; GRAPHIC METHODS; LINGUISTICS; MIXING; NEODYMIUM; PRODUCT DESIGN; SOFTWARE DESIGN; STANDARDS; TOOLS; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

EID: 42149108465     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1297027.1297047     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. S. W. Ambler. The Object Primer - Agile Model-Driven Development with UML 2.0. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
2. A. Black. Visible planning on paper and on screen: The impact of working medium on decision-making by novice graphic designer. Behaviour and Information Technology, 9(4):283-296, 1990.
3. N. Boulila. Group support for distributed collaborative concurrent software modeling. In ASE '04, pages 422-425.
4. L. C. Briand, Y Labiche, M. D. Penta, and H. D. Yan-Bondoc. An experimental investigation of formality in UML-based development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(10):833-849, 2005.
5. Q. Chen, J. Grundy, and J. Hosking. An e-whiteboard application to support early design-stage sketching of UML diagrams. In IEEE Conference on Human-Centric Computing (HCC'03), 2003.
6. M. Cherubini, G. Venolia, R. DeLine, and A. J. Ko. Let's go to the whiteboard: how and why software developers use drawings. In CHI '07, pages 557-566.
7. O. Creighton, M. Ott, and B. Bruegge. Software cinemavideo-based requirements engineering. In RE '06, pages 106-115.
8. C. H. Damm, K. M. Hansen, and M. Thomsen. Tool support for cooperative object-oriented design: gesture based modelling on an electronic whiteboard. In CHI '00, pages 518-525.
9. C. H. Damm, K. M. Hansen, M. Thomsen, and M. Tyrsted. Supporting several levels of restriction in the UML. In UML '00, LNCS 2844, pages 396-409. Springer, 2000.
10. U. Dekel. Supporting distributed software design meetings: what can we learn from co-located meetings? In Workshop on Human and Social Factors of Software Engineering (HSSE) at ICSE'05, SIGSOFTSoftw. Eng. Notes, 30(4):1-7, 2005.
11. ACM DesignFest homepage. http://designfest.acm.org.
12. S. Elrod et al. Liveboard: a large interactive display supporting group meetings, presentations, and remote collaboration. In CHI '92, pages 599-607.
13. G. W Furnas and B. B. Bederson. Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces. In CHI '95, pages 234-241.
14. J. Gil and S. Kent. Three dimensional software modelling. In ICSE '98, pages 105-114.
15. J. Grundy and J. Hosking. Supporting generic sketching-based input of diagrams in a domain-specific visual language meta-tool. In ICSE '07, pages 282-291.
16. J. D. Herbsleb, H. A. Klein, G. Olson, H. Brunner, J. Olson, and J. Harding. Object-oriented analysis and design in software project teams. Human-Computer Interaction, 10(2):249-292, 1995.
17. S. R. Klemmer et al. The designers' outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site. In UIST '01, pages 1-10.
18. A. Ko, R. DeLine, and G. Venolia. Information needs in collocated software development teams. In ICSE '07, pages 344-353.
19. C. F. J. Lange and M. R. V. Chaudron. Effects of defects in UML models: an experimental investigation. In ICSE '06, pages 401-411.
20. T. D. LaToza, G. Venolia, and R. DeLine. Maintaining mental models: a study of developer work habits. In ICSE '06, pages 492-501.
21. J. Lin, M. W. Newman, J. I. Hong, and J. A. Landay. Denim: finding a tighter fit between tools and practice for web site design. In CHI '00, pages 510-517.
22. A. Mehra, J. Grundy, and J. Hosking. Supporting collaborative software design with a plug-in, web services-based architecture. In Workshop on Directions in Software Engineering Environments (WoDiSEE) at ICSE '04.
23. Object Management Group. UML 2.0 specification.
24. B. Plimmer and M. Apperley. Interacting with sketched interface designs: an evaluation study. In CHI '04, pages 1337-1340.
25. D. L. Schacter and E. Tulving. What are the memory systems of 1994? In D. L. Schacter and E. Tulving, editors, Memory Systems, pages 2-38. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
26. S. Tilley and S. Huang. A qualitative assessment of the efficacy of UML diagrams as a form of graphical documentation in aiding program understanding. In SIGDOC '03, pages 184-191.
27. W Visser. Designing as construction of representations: A dynamic viewpoint in cognitive design research. Human-Computer Interaction, 21(1): 103-152, 2006.
28. J. Wu, T. Graham, and P. Smith. A study of collaboration in software design. In 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE '03). IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
29. J. Wu and T. C. N. Graham. The software design board: A tool supporting workstyle transitions in collaborative software design. In LNCS 2844, pages 92-106. Springer, 2004.