Protocol for economic evaluation alongside the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised controlled trial

Implementation Science

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Mortimer, Duncan ^a,b   French, Simon D ^a   McKenzie, Joanne E ^a   O'Connor, Denise A ^a   Green, Sally E ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149107644     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-12     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group (AAMPGG), Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain Australian Academic Press: Brisbane 2003 http://nhmrc.gov.au
2. IMPLEmenting a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain evidence-based manageMENT in general practice (IMPLEMENT): cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol. JE McKenzie SD French DA O'Connor JM Grimshaw D Mortimer S Michie J Francis N Spike P Schattner PM Kent R Buchbinder SE Green, Implementation Science 2008 3 1 11 Epub ahead of print. 18294375
3. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. JM Grimshaw L Shirran R Thomas G Mowatt C Fraser L Bero R Grilli E Harvey A Oxman MA O'Brien, Med Care 2001 39 II2 45 10.1097/00005650-200108002- 00002 11583120
4. Systematic review of economic evaluations and cost analyses of guideline implementation strategies. L Vale R Thomas G MacLennan J Grimshaw, European Journal of Health Economics 2007 8 111 121 10.1007/s10198-007-0043-8 17347844
5. The methodological quality of economic evaluations of guideline implementation into clinical practice: a systematic review of empiric studies. T Hoomans SM Evers AJ Ament MW Hubben T van der Weijden JM Grimshaw JL Severens, Value in Health 2007 10 305 316 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00175.x 17645685
6. Patient-centred and professional-directed implementation strategies for diabetes guidelines: a cluster-randomized trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis. RF Dijkstra LW Niessen JC Braspenning E Adang RT Grol, Diabetic Medicine 2006 23 164 170 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01751.x 16433714
7. Evaluating two implementation strategies for whiplash guidelines in physiotherapy: a cluster randomised trial. T Rebbeck CG Maher KM Refshauge, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2006 52 165 174 16942451
8. Cost-effectiveness of implementing national guidelines in the treatment of acute otitis media in children. H Koskinen UM Rautakorpi H Sintonen P Honkanen S Huikko P Huovinen T Klaukka E Palva RP Roine H Sarkkinen H Varonen M Makela Mikstra Collaborative Study Group, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2006 22 454 459 10.1017/S0266462306051373 16984678
9. Cost-effectiveness of an active implementation strategy for the Dutch physiotherapy guideline for low back pain. M Hoeijenbos T Bekkering L Lamers E Hendriks M van Tulder M Koopmanschap, Health Policy 2005 75 85 98 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.02.008 16298231
10. Dutch physiotherapy guideline for low back pain. GE Bekkering HJM Hendriks BW Koes RAB Oostendorp RWJG Ostelo JMC Thomassen MW van Tulder, Physiotherapy 2003 89 82 96 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60579-2
11. Designing evaluations of interventions to change clinical practice. J Mason J Wood J Freemantle, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 1999 4 106 111 10387402
12. Evaluating the cost effectiveness of interventions designed to increase utilisation of evidence-based guidelines. M Sculpher, Family Practice 2000 17 S26 S31 10.1093/fampra/17.suppl_1.S26 10735265
13. M Drummond B O'Brien G Stoddart G Torrance, Methods for the economic evaluation of health programmes New York Oxford University Press 2 1997
14. Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review. CM Bell DR Urbacj JG Ray AB Rosen D Greenberg PJ Neumann, BMJ 2006 332 699 703 16495332 10.1136/bmj.38737.607558.80
15. Bias in published cost-effectiveness studies? Further evidence from Australia. D Mortimer K Dalziel L Segal, Cost Effectiveness & Resource Allocation
16. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. JM Grimshaw RE Thomas G MacLennan C Fraser CR Ramsay L Vale P Whitty MP Eccles L Matowe L Shirran M Wensing R Dijkstra C Donaldson, Health Technology Assessment 2004 8 6 iii 72 14960256
17. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. C Bombardier, Spine 2000 25 3100 3103 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00003 11124724
18. N Bellamy, Musculoskeletal clinical metrology Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993
19. G Hawthorne J Richardson N Day, Technical Report 12: Using the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Version 1 Melbourne: Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Monash University 2000
20. A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. G Hawthorne J Richardson NA Day, Annals of Medicine 2001 33 358 370 11491195
21. Trial-based economic evaluations: an overview of design and analysis. H Glick D Polsky K Schulman, Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice New York: Oxford University Press, Drummond MF, McGuire A, 2001
22. Commonwealth Department of Health & Ageing, Manual of resource items and their associated costs for use in major submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee involving economic analyses Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia 2 2002
23. Bureau of Transport Economics, Road crash costs in Australia, BTE Report 102 Canberra: AGPS 2000
24. Australian Bureau of Statistics, How Australians use their time, ABS Catalogue No. 4153.0 Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia 1997
25. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Labour Price Index, Australia. ABS Catalogue No. 6345.0 Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
26. Publishing study protocols: making them visible will improve registration, reporting and recruitment. F Godlee, BMC News and Views 2001 2 4