Investigation to predict faecal continence in patients undergoing reversal of a defunctioning stoma (Porridge enema test)

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 379-385

  Pares D ^a   Duncan, J ^a   Dudding, T ^a   Phillips, R K S ^a   Norton, Chris ^a  

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Defunctioning stoma; Faecal incontinence; Functional evaluation; Porridge enema test

Indexed keywords

ENEMA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANUS CONTINENCE; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STOMA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ENEMA; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURGICAL STOMAS;

EID: 42149094969     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01333.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fallon WF Jr. The present role of colostomy in the management of trauma. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 1094-102.
2. Deutekom M, Terra MP, Dobben AC, Dijkgraaf MGW, Baeten CGMI, Stoker J, Bossuyt PMM. Impact of faecal incontinence on health domains. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 263-9.
3. Buchanan GN, Nicholls T, Solanki D, Kamm MA. Investigation of faecal incontinence. Hosp Med 2001; 62: 533-7.
4. Eckardt VF, Elmer T. Reliability of anal pressure measurements. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 72-77.
5. Rao SS. Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1585-604.
6. Riegler G, Esposito I. Bristol scale stool form. A still valid help in medical practice and clinical research. Tech Coloproctol 2001; 5: 163-4.
7. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999; 44: 77-80.
8. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20: 37-46.
9. Pell M, Flynn WJ Jr, Seibel RW. Is colostomy always necessary in the treatment of open pelvic fractures? J Trauma 1998; 45: 371-3.
10. Maslekar S, Gardiner A, Maklin C, Duthie GS. Investigation and treatment of faecal incontinence. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82: 363-71.
11. Wald A. Anorectal manometry and imaging are not necessary in patients with fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2681-3.
12. Saunders RN, Thomas WM. Antegrade porridge enema to assess anorectal function after severe perineal sepsis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 74-75.
13. Rao SS, Read NW, Stobart JA, Haynes WG, Benjamin S, Holdsworth CD. Anorectal contractility under basal conditions and during rectal infusion of saline in ulcerative colitis. Gut 1988; 29: 769-77.
14. Bannister JJ, Davison P, Timms JM, Gibbons C, Read NW. Effect of stool size and consistency on defecation. Gut 1987; 28: 1246-50.
15. Ambroze WL, Pemberton JH, Bell AM, Brown ML, Zinsmeister AR. The effect of stool consistency on rectal and neorectal emptying. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 1-7.
16. Fox M, Schwizer W, Menne D, Stutz B, Fried M, Thumshirn M. The physical properties of rectal contents have effects on anorectal continence: insights from a study into the cause of fecal spotting on orlistat. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 2147-56.