Supporting college transitions through collaborative programming: A conceptual model for guiding policy

Teachers College Record

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 838-866

  Karp, Melinda Mechur ^a   Hughes, Katherine L ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149090427     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
2. American Association of State Colleges and Universities. (2002, May). The open door . . . assessing the promise and problems of dual enrollment (State Policy Briefing Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Author.
3. Bailey, T. R., & Karp, M. M. (2003). Promoting college access and success: A review of dual credit and other high school/college transition programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.
4. Cherry Commission. (2004). Final report of the Lt. Governor's commission on higher education and economic growth. Lansing, MI: Author.
5. Karp, M. M., Bailey, T. R., Hughes, K. L., & Fermin, B.J. (2004). State dual enrollment programs: Promoting access and quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.
6. Karp, M. M., Bailey, T. R., Hughes, K. L., & Fermin, B.J. (2005, April). State dual enrollment programs: Promoting access and quality (CCRC Brief No. 26). New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
7. Lords, E. (2000, June 30). New efforts at community colleges focus on underachieving teens. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A45.
8. National Commission on the High School Senior Year. (2001). Raising our sights: No high school senior left behind. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
9. National Governor's Association. (2005). Redesigning the American high school: Getting it done, 10 steps to an action agenda. Washington, DC: Author.
10. Sax, L. J., Keup, J. R., Gilmartin, S. K., Stolzenberg, E. B., & Harper, C. (2002). Findings from the 2002 administration of your first college year (YFCY): National aggregates. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Higher Education Research Institute.
11. Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 599 - 623.
13. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). The condition of education 2004. Washington, DC: Author.
14. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education. (2003). The secondary and technical education excellence act of 2003: Summary of major provisions. Washington, DC: Author.
15. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education. (2005, April). OVAE review. Retrieved July 7, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/news/newsletters/ovaereview/orev043005.html
16. Waits, T., Setzer, J. C., & Lewis, L. (2005). Dual credit and exam-based courses in U.S. high schools, 2002-2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
17. Venezia, A., Kirst, M. W., & Antonio, A. L. (2003). Betraying the college dream: How disconnected K-12 and postsecondary education systems undermine student aspirations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University's Bridge Project.