Differential response effects of data collection mode in a cancer screening study of unmarried women ages 40-75 years: A randomized trial

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Clark, Melissa A ^a   Rogers, Michelle L ^a   Armstrong, Gene F ^a   Rakowski, William ^a   Kviz, Frederick J ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUAL FEMALE; HUMAN; LESBIAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE WOMAN; COMPUTER; FAMILY SIZE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTERS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HOMOSEXUALITY, FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; RHODE ISLAND; SINGLE PERSON; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 42149083183     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-10     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Marital status of the population 15 years old and over, by sex and race: 1950 to present. U.S. Census Bureau, 2003
2. Perceptions of cervical cancer and Pap smear screening behavior by women's sexual orientation. JH Price AN Easton SK Telljohann PB Wallace, Journal of Community Health 1996 21 2 89 105 10.1007/BF01682301 8728358
3. Importance of psychological variables in understanding risk perceptions and breast cancer screening of African American women. D Bowen KM Hickman D Powers, Womens Health 1997 3 3-4 227 242 9426495
4. Lesbian health issues for the primary care provider. EJ Rankow, J Fam Pract 1995 40 5 486 496 7730774
5. Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future. Institute of Medicine, Washington, D.C., National Academy Press 1999
6. Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol abuse: A field experiment. WS Aquilino, Public Opinion Quarterly 1994 58 210 240 10.1086/269419
7. The feasibility of collecting drug abuse data by telephone. JC Gfroerer AL Hughes, Public Health Rep 1991 106 4 384 393 1908589
8. Mode effects in a survey of medicare prostate surgery patients. FJ Fowler AM Roman ZX Di, Public Opinion Quarterly 1998 62 29 46 10.1086/297829
9. Research on survey data quality. RM Groves, Public Health Rep 1987 51 S156 S172
10. Response Effects. N Bradburn, Handbook of Survey Research San Diego, CA, Academic Press, Rossi P, Wright J, Anderson A, 1983
11. Computer-assisted Interviewing. WE Saris, Newbury Park, CA, Sage 1991
12. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. JC Newman DC Des Jarlais CF Turner J Gribble P Cooley D Paone, Am J Public Health 2002 92 2 294 297 11818309
13. A comparison of computer-based and personal interviews for the gynecologic history update. S Hasley, Obstet Gynecol 1995 85 4 494 498 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00012-G 7898822
14. Comparability of a computer-assisted versus written method for collecting health behavior information from adolescent patients. PM Webb GD Zimet JD Fortenberry MJ Blythe, J Adolesc Health 1999 24 6 383 388 10.1016/S1054-139X(99) 00005-1 10401965
15. A comparison of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaires in a survey on smoking, alcohol, and drug use. DL Wright WS Aquilino AJ Supple, Public Opinion Quarterly 1998 62 331 353 10.1086/297849
16. When asked, patients tell: disclosure of sensitive health-risk behaviors. B Gerbert A Bronstone S Pantilat S McPhee M Allerton J Moe, Med Care 1999 37 1 104 111 10.1097/00005650-199901000-00014 10413398
17. Mode effects in self-reported mental health data. JF Epstein PR Barker LA Kroutil, Public Opinion Quarterly 2001 65 529 549 10.1086/323577
18. Risk behaviors by audio computer-assisted self-interviews among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative injection drug users. GE Macalino DD Celentano C Latkin SA Strathdee D Vlahov, AIDS Educ Prev 2002 14 5 367 378 10.1521/aeap.14.6.367.24075 12413183
19. Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. DS Metzger B Koblin C Turner H Navaline F Valenti S Holte M Gross A Sheon H Miller P Cooley GR Seage 3rd, Am J Epidemiol 2000 152 2 99 106 10.1093/aje/152.2.99 10909945
20. The effects of age, gender, and experience on measures of attitudes regarding computers. DB Pope-Davis JS Twing, Computers in Human Behavior 1991 7 333 339 10.1016/0747-5632(91)90020-2
21. Age differences in computer anxiety: The role of computer experience, gender, and education. JL Dyck JA Smither, Journal of Educational Computing Research 1994 10 239 248
22. Accuracy of self-report of mammography and Pap smear in a low-income urban population. PG McGovern N Lurie KL Margolis JS Slater, Am J Prev Med 1998 14 3 201 208 10.1016/S0749-3797(97)00076-7 9569221
23. Agreement between self-reported early cancer detection practices and medical audits among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white health plan members in northern California. RA Hiatt EJ Perez-Stable C Quesenberry Jr. F Sabogal R Otero-Sabogal SJ McPhee, Prev Med 1995 24 3 278 285 10.1006/pmed.1995.1045 7644451
24. Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. NP Gordon RA Hiatt DI Lampert, J Natl Cancer Inst 1993 85 7 566 570 10.1093/jnci/85.7.566 8455203
25. Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: the accuracy of self-report. JG Zapka C Bigelow T Hurley LD Ford J Egelhofer WM Cloud E Sachsse, American Journal of Public Health 1996 86 7 1016 1021 8669504
26. How valid are mammography self-reports? ES King BK Rimer B Trock A Balshem P Engstrom, American Journal of Public Health 1990 80 11 1386 1388 2240315
27. Patterns and predictors of mammography utilization among breast cancer survivors. CA Doubeni TS Field M Ulcickas Yood SJ Rolnick CP Quessenberry H Fouayzi JH Gurwitz F Wei, Cancer 2006 106 11 2482 2488 10.1002/cncr.21893 16634097
28. Cancer screening practices among cancer survivors. PC Trask C Rabin ML Rogers J Whiteley J Nash G Frierson B Pinto, Am J Prev Med 2005 28 4 351 356 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.005 15831340
29. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. DD Heckathorn, Social Problems 1997 44 2 174 199 10.1525/sp.1997.44.2.03x0221m
30. Strategies and cost of recruitment of middle-aged and older unmarried women: Comparing women who partner with women and women who partner with men: Philadelphia, PA. MC Clark CJ Neighbors MR Wasserman GF Armstrong ML Drnach SL Howie TL Hawthorne, American Public Health Association 2005
31. Ci3 for Windows (version 2.5). Sawtooth Software, Sequin, WA, USA http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/support/
32. Guide to clinical preventive services. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force., http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/pocketgd.htm
33. Screening Mammograms: Questions and Answers. National Cancer Institute, website http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Detection/breast-cancer
34. The Pap Test: Questions and Answers. National Cancer Institute, website http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Detection/Pap-test
35. SAS Institute User's Guide (9.1). SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA http://support.sas.com/documentation/
36. Audio and video computer assisted self-interviewing: Preliminary tests of new technology for data collection. JM O'Reilly M Hubbard JT Lessler P Biemer C Turner, Journal of Official Statistics 1994 10 197 214
37. Impact of ACASI on reporting of male-male sexual contacts: Preliminary results from the 1995 National Survey of Adolescent Males. CF Turner L Ku FL Sonnestein JH Peck, Health Survey Research Methods: Conference Proceedings Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics, Warnecke RB, 1996