Patterns of spatial variability in the morphology of sympatric fucoids

Northeastern Naturalist

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 111-122

  Coleman, Melinda A ^a,b   Muhlin, Jessica F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; FUCUS; FUCUS SPIRALIS; FUCUS VESICULOSUS;

EID: 42049119613     PISSN: 10926194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1656/1092-6194(2008)15[111:POSVIT]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, C.I.H., and G.W. Scott. 1998. The occurrence of distinct morphotypes within a population of Fucus spiralis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 78:1003-1006.
2. Anderson, M.J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26:32-46.
3. Anderson, M.J., and P. Legendre. 1999. An empirical comparison of permutation methods for tests of partial regression coefficients in a linear model. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 62:271-303.
4. Anderson, M.J., and C.J.F. Ter Braak. 2003. Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 73:85-113.
5. Bäck, S. 1993. Morphological variation of northern Baltic Fucus vesiculosus along the exposure gradient. Annales Botanica Fennici 30:275-283.
6. Burrows, E.M., and S. Lodge. 1951. Autecology and the species problem in Fucus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 30:161-176.
7. Burrows, E.M., and S. Lodge. 1953. Culture of Fucus hybrids. Nature 172:1009-1010.
8. Chapman, A.R.O. 1974. The genetic basis of morphological variation in some Laminaria populations. Marine Biology 24:85-91.
9. Chapman, A.R.O. 1995. Functional ecology of fucoid algae: 23 years of progress. Phycologia 34:1-32.
10. Coleman, M.A., and S.H. Brawley. 2005. Are life-history characteristics good predictors of genetic diversity and structure? A case study of the intertidal alga Fucus spiralis (Heterokontophyta: Phaeophyceae). Journal of Phycology 41:753-762.
11. Engel, C.R., C. Daguin, and E.A. Serrao. 2005. Genetic entities and mating system in hermaphroditic Fucus spiralis and its close dioecious relative F. vesiculosus (Fucaceae, Phaeophyceae). Molecular Ecology 14:2033-2046.
12. Fowler-Walker, M.J., T. Wernberg, and S.D. Connell. 2006. Differences in kelp morphology between wave-sheltered and exposed localities: Morphologically plastic or fixed traits? Marine Biology 148:755-767.
13. Fritsch, F.E. 1945. The Structure and Reproduction of the Algae, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. UK. 939 pp.
14. Jordan, A.J., and R.L. Vadas. 1972. Influence of environmental parameters on intraspecific variation in Fucus vesiculosus. Marine Biology 14:248-252.
15. Kalvas, A., and L. Kautsky. 1993. Geographical variation in Fucus vesiculosus morphology in the Baltic and North Seas. European Journal of Phycology 28:85-91.
16. Kalvas, A., and L. Kautsky. 1998. Morphological variation in Fucus vesiculosus populations along temperature and salinity gradients in Iceland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 78:985-1001.
17. Kniep, H. 1925. Ueber Fucus-bastarde. Flora 118-9:331-38.
18. Knight, M., and M. Parke. 1950. A biological study of Fucus vesiculosus L. and F. serratus L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 29:439-514.
19. Mathieson, A.C., T.A. Norton, and M. Neushul. 1981. The taxonomic implications of genetic and environmental induced variations in seaweed morphology. Botanical Review 47:313-347.
20. McArdle, B.H., and M.J. Anderson. 2001. Fitting multivariate models to community data: A comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290-297.
21. Mclachlan, J., L.C.M. Chen, and T. Edelstein 1971. Culture of 4 species of Fucus under laboratory conditions. Canadian Journal of Botany 49:1463-1469.
22. Muhlin, J.F., C.R. Engel, and S.H. Brawley. In press. Barriers to gene flow: The influence of coastal topography and circulation patterns in structuring populations of an intertidal alga. Limnology and Oceanography.
23. Roberson, L.M., and J.A. Coyer. 2004. Variation in blade morphology of the kelp Eisenia arborea: Incipient speciation due to local water motion? Marine Ecology Progress Series 282:115-128.
24. Scott, G.W., and F.G. Hardy. 1994. Observations of the occurrence of hybrids between 2 sympatric species of fucoid algae. Cryptogamie Algologie 15:297-305.
25. Scott, G.W., S.L. Hull, S.E. Hornby, F.G. Hardy, and N.J.P. Owens. 2001. Phenotypic variation in Fucus spiralis (Phaeophyceae): Morphology, chemical phenotype, and their relationship to the environment. European Journal of Phycology 36:43-50.
26. Thompson, T.L., and Glenn E.P. 1994. Plaster standards to measure water motion. Limnology and Oceanography 39:1768-1779.
27. Underwood, A.J. 1997. Experiments in ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 504 pp.
28. Wallace, A.L., A.S. Klein, and A.C. Mathieson. 2004. Determining the affinities of salt marsh fucoids using microsatellite markers: Evidence of hybridization and introgression between two species of Fucus (Phaeophyta) in a Maine estuary. Journal of Phycology 40:1013-1027.