A hybrid immersed boundary and material point method for simulating 3D fluid-structure interaction problems

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 56, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2151-2177

  Gilmanov, Andar ^a   Acharya, Sumanta ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Louisiana State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial compressibility; Dual time stepping; Fluid structure interaction; Hybrid immersed boundary method; Immersed boundaries; Material point method

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SHEAR FLOW; UNSTEADY FLOW;

HYBRID IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHOD; MATERIAL POINT METHOD;

FLOW SIMULATION;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLOW SIMULATION; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SHEAR FLOW; UNSTEADY FLOW;

EID: 42049113593     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1578     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Scardovelli R, Zaleski S. Direct numerical simulation of free-surface and interfacial flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 1999; 31:567-603.
2. Popinet S, Zaleski S. A front-tracking algorithm for accurate representation of surface tension. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1999; 30:775-793.
3. Fritts MJ, Cowley W, Trease HE. The Free Lagrange Method. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer: New York, 1985; 238.
4. Hirt CW, Amsden AA, Cook JL. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. Journal of Computational Physics 1974; 14(3):227-253.
5. Donea J, Giuliani S, Halleux JP. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1982; 33:689-723.
6. Belytschko T, Kennedy J. Finite element approach to pressure wave attenuation by reactor fuel subassemblies. Journal of Pressure Wave Technology 1975; 172-177.
7. Donea J, Fasoli-Stella P, Giuliani S. Finite element solution of transient fluid-structure problems in Lagrangian coordinates. Proceedings of the International Meeting on Fast Reactor Safety and Related Physics, Chicago, vol. 3, 1976; 1427-1435.
8. Liu H, Kawachi K. A numerical study of undulatory swimming. Journal of Computational Physics 1999; 155(2):223-247.
9. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K. Solution techniques for the fully discretized equations in computation of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time formulations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:5743-5753.
10. Tezduar TE. Stabilized finite element formulation for incompressible flow computations. Advanced in Applied Mechanics 1991; 28:1-44.
11. Noh WF. CEL: a time-dependent, two-space-dimensional, coupled Eulerian-Lagrange code. Methods in Computational Physics. Academic Press: New York, 1964; 117-179.
12. Udaykumar HS, Kan H-C, Shyy W, Tran-Son-Tay R. Multiphase dynamics in arbitrary geometries on fixed Cartesian grids. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 137:366-405.
13. Almgren AS, Bell JB, Colella P, Marthaler T. A Cartesian grid projection method for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1997; 18(5).
14. Johansen H, Colella P. A cartesian grid embedded boundary method for Poisson's equation on irregular domains. Journal of Computational physics 1998; 147:60-85.
15. Udaykumar HS, Mittal R, Rampunggoon P, Khanna A. Sharp interface cartesian grid method for simulating flows with complex moving boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics 2001; 174:345-380.
16. Popinet S. Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries. Journal of Computational physics 2003; 190(2):572-600.
17. Kirkpatrick MP, Armfield SW, Kent JH. A representation of curved boundaries for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations on a staggered three-dimensional Cartesian grid. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 184(1):1-36.
18. Hirt CW, Nichols BD. Volume of fluid (VOF) methods for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 39:201-225.
19. Hyman JM. Numerical methods for tracking interfaces. Physica D 1984; 12:396-407.
20. Noh W, Woodward P. SLIC (simple line interface calculation). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Fluid Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 59. Springer: Berlin, 1976; 330-340.
21. Ashgriz N, Poo JY. Flux linesegment model for advection and interface reconstruction. Journal of Computational Physics 1991; 92:449-468.
22. Osher SJ, Sethian JA. Front propagating with curvature depend speed: algorithm based on Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Journal of Computational Physics 1988; 79:12-49.
23. Sethian JA, Smereka P. Level set method for fluid interface. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2003; 35:341-372.
24. Enright D, Fedkiw R, Ferziger J, Mitchel I. A hybrid particle level set method for improved interface capturing. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 183:83-116.
25. Saul'ev VK. On the solution of some boundary value problems on high performance computers by fictitious domain method. Siberian Mathematical Journal 1963; 4(4):912-925 (in Russian).
26. Glowinski R, Pan T-W, Hesla TI, Joseph DD, Periaux J. A fictitious domain method with distributed Lagrange multipliers for the numerical simulation of particulate flow. Contemporary Mathematics 1998; 218:121-137.
27. Glowinski R, Pan TW, Hesla TI et al. A fictitious domain approach to the direct numerical simulation of incompressible viscous flow past moving rigid bodies: application to particulate flow. Journal of Computational Physics 2001; 169:363-426.
28. Bernardi C, Maday Y, Patera AT. Domain decomposition by the mortar element method. In Asymptotic and Numerical Methods for PDEs with Critical Parameters, Kaper HG, Garbey M (eds). NATO ASI Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 384. Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1993; 269-286.
29. Baaijens FPT. A fictious domain/mortar element method for fluid-structure interaction. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2001; 35:743-761.
30. De Hart J, Peters GWM, Schreurs PJG, Baaijens FPT. A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. Journal of Biomechanics 2003; 36:103-112.
31. Peskin CS. Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. Journal of Computational Physics 1972; 10:252-271.
32. LeVeque RJ, Li Z. The immersed interface method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1994; 31:1019.
33. Peskin CS. Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. Journal of Computational Physics 1977; 25:220-252.
34. Lee L, LeVeque RJ. An immersed interface method for incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2003; 25(3):832-856.
35. Xu S, Wang ZJ. An immersed interface method for simulating the interaction of a fluid with moving boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 216:454-493.
36. Zhang L, Gerstenberg A, Wang X, Liu WK. Immersed finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004; 193:2051-2067.
37. Liu WK, Jun S, Zhang YF. Reproducing kernel particle methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1995; 20:1081-1106.
38. Mohd-Yusof J. Combined immersed boundaries/b-splines methods for simulations of flows in complex geometries. Ctr Annual Research Briefs, Stanford University, NASA Ames, 1997.
39. Fadlun EA, Verzicco R, Orlandi P, Mohd-Yusof J. Combined immersed-boundary finite-difference methods for three-dimensional complex flow simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 161:35-60.
40. Gilmanov A, Sotiropoulos F. A hybrid cartesian/immersed boundary method for simulating flows with 3d geometrically complex moving bodies. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 207:457-492.
41. Gilmanov A, Sotiropoulos F, Balaras E. A general reconstruction algorithm for simulating flows with complex 3D immersed boundaries on Cartesian grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 191:660-669.
42. Schreyer HL, Sulsky D, Zhou S-J. Modeling delamination as a strong discontinuity with the material point method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 191:2483-2507.
43. Chen Z, Brannon R. An evaluation of the material point method. Technical Report 2002-0482, SAND REPORT, Sandia National Laboratory, 2002.
44. Guilkey JE, Weiss JA. Implicit time integration for material point method: quantitive and algorithmic comparison with the finite element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2003; 57:1323-1338.
45. York II AR, Sulsky D, Schreyer HL. Fluid-membrane interaction based on the material point method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 48:901-924.
46. Bathe K-J. Finite Element Procedure. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.
47. Egleton CD, Popel AS. Large deformation of red cell ghost in a simple shear flow. Physics of Fluids 1998; 10(8):1834-1845.
48. Sotiropoulos F, Constantinescu G. Pressure-based residual smoothing operators for multistage pseudo-compressibility algorithms. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 133(1):129-145.
49. Sotiropoulos F, Abdallah S. A primitive variable method for the solution of external, 3-D incompressible, viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 103(2):336-349.
50. Merkle CL, Athavale M. Time-accurate unsteady incompressible flow algorithm based on artificial compressibility. AIAA Paper, 87-1137, 1987.
51. Burgers D, Sulsky D, Brackbill JU. Mass matrix formulation of the flip particle-in-cell method. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 103:1-15.
52. York II AR, Sulsky D, Schreyer HL. The material point method for simulation of thin membranes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999; 44:1429-1456.
53. Green AE, Adkins JE. Large Elastic Deformation and Non-linear Continuum Mechanics. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1960.
54. Navot Y. Elastic membranes in viscous shear flow. Physics of Fluids 1998; 10(8):1819-1833.
55. ten Cate A, Nieuwstad CH, Derksen JJ, Van den Akken HEA. Particle imaging velocimetry experiments and lattice-Boltzmann simulation on a single sphere setting under gravity. Physics of Fluids 2002; 14:4012-4025.
56. Thompson KW. Time-dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, ii. Journal of Computational Physics 1990; 89(2):439-461. :
57. Pozrikidis C. Finite deformation of liquid capsules enclosed by elastic membranes in simple shear flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1995; 297:123-152.
58. Gilmanov A, Acharya S. A fluid/structure interaction method for compliant biological tissues: application to simulate iris accommodation. Seventh World Congress on Computational Mechanics, Los Angeles, 16-22 July 2006.
59. Gilmanov A, Acharya S. An immersed boundary and material point methodologies for moving/compliant surfaces with heat transfer. Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL, 5-10 November 2006.