Unequal allelic frequencies at the self-incompatibility locus within local populations of Prunus avium L.: An effect of population structure?

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 889-899

  Stoeckel, S ^a,b,e   Castric, V ^c   Mariette, S ^a,b,d   Vekemans, X ^c  

^a Cemagref   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c UNIV LILLE   (France)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

^e AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

Author keywords

Balancing selection; Isoplethy; Population genetic structure; S alleles; Self incompatibility

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC STRUCTURE; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY; SHRUB;

PRUNUS; PRUNUS AVIUM;

EID: 42049093412     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01504.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Chikhi, L., Raufaste, N. Bonhomme, F. 1996-2004. Genetix 4.05, Logiciel sous Windows TM pour la Génétique des Populations, Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions. CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France.
2. Boucher, W. 1993. A Deterministic Analysis of Self-Incompatibility Alleles. J. Math. Biol. 31 : 149 155.
3. Brennan, A.C., Harris, S.A. Hiscock, S.J. 2006. The population genetics of sporophytic self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae): The number, frequency, and dominance interactions of S alleles across its British range. Evolution 60 : 213 224.
4. Campbell, J. Lawrence, M. 1981. The population genetics of the self-incompatibility polymorphism in Papaver rhoeas. II. The number and frequency of S-alleles in a natural population. Heredity 46 : 81 90.
5. Castric, V. Vekemans, X. 2004. Plant self-incompatibility in natural populations: a critical assessment of recent theoretical and empirical advances. Mol. Ecol. 13 : 2873 2889.
6. Charlesworth, D., Mable, B.K., Schierup, M.H., Bartolome, C. Awadalla, P. 2003. Diversity and linkage of genes in the self-incompatibility gene family in Arabidopsis lyrata. Genetics 164 : 1519 1535.
7. Cipriani, G., Lot, G., Huang, W.G., Marrazzo, M.T., Peterlunger, E. Testolin, R. 1999. AC/GT and AG/CT microsatellite repeats in peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch]: isolation, characterisation and cross-species amplification in Prunus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99 : 65 72.
8. De Cuyper, B., Sonneveld, T. Tobutt, K.R. 2005. Determining self-incompatibility genotypes in Belgian wild cherries. Mol. Ecol. 14 : 945 955.
9. Dirlewanger, E., Cosson, P., Tavaud, M., Aranzana, M.J., Poizat, C., Zanetto, A., Arus, P. Laigret, F. 2002. Development of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 105 : 127 138.
10. Downey, S.L. Iezzoni, A.F. 2000. Polymorphic DNA markers in black cherry (Prunus serotina) are identified using sequences from sweet cherry, peach, and sour cherry. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125 : 76 80.
11. Emerson, S. 1939. A preliminary survey of the Oenothera organensis population. Genetics, 24 : 524 537.
12. Finney, D. 1952. The equilibrium of a self-incompatible polymorphic species. Genet. Res. 26 : 33 64.
13. Fisher, R. 1941. The theoretical consequences of polyploid inheritance for the mid style form in Lythrum salicaria. Ann. Eugen. 11 : 31 38.
14. Frascaria, N., Santi, F. Gouyon, P.H. 1993. Genetic differentiation within and among populations of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill) and wild cherry (Prunus avium L). Heredity 70 : 634 641.
15. Glémin, S., Gaude, T., Guillemin, M.L., Lourmas, M., Olivieri, I. Mignot, A. 2005. Balancing selection in the wild: Testing population genetics theory of self-incompatibility in the rare species Brassica insularis. Genetics 171 : 279 289.
16. Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86 : 485 486.
17. Hamrick, J. Godt, M. 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In : Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources (A. Brown, M.T. Clegg, A.L. Kahler B. Weir, eds pp. 43 63. Sinauer, Sunderland.
18. Hamrick, J., Godt, M. Sherman-Broyles, S. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6 : 95 124.
19. Joobeur, T., Periam, N., Vicente, M.C., King, G.J. Arus, P. 2000. Development of a second generation linkage map for almond using RAPD and SSR markers. Genome 43 : 649 655.
20. Kamau, E., Charlesworth, B. Charlesworth, D. 2007. Linkage disequilibrium and recombination rate estimates in the self-incompatibility region of Arabidopsis lyrata. Genetics 176 : 2357 2369.
21. Kato, S. Mukai, Y. 2004. Allelic diversity of S-RNase at the self-incompatibility locus in natural flowering cherry populations (Prunus lannesiana var. speciosa). Heredity 92 : 249 256.
22. Kato, S., Iwata, H., Tsumura, Y. Mukai, Y. 2007. Distribution of S-alleles in island populations of flowering cherry, Prunus lannesiana var. speciosa. Genes Genet. Syst. 82 : 65 75.
23. Kimura, M. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. Kimura, M. Crow, J. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49 : 725 738.
25. Lane, M.D. Lawrence, M.J. 1995. The population genetics of the self-incompatibility polymorphism in Papaver Rhoeas.10. An association between incompatibility genotype and seed dormancy. Heredity 75 : 92 97.
26. Lawrence, M.J. 2000. Population genetics of the homomorphic self-incompatibility polymorphisms in flowering plants. Ann. Bot. 85 : 221 226.
27. Mantel, N. 1974. Comment and a suggestion. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89 : 378 380.
28. Mariette, S., Lefranc, M., Legrand, P., Taneyhill, D., FrascariaLacoste, N. Machon, N. 1997. Genetic variability in wild cherry populations in France. Effects of colonizing processes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94 : 904 908.
29. Maruyama, T. Nei, M. 1981. Genetic variability maintained by mutation and overdominant selection in finite populations. Genetics 98 : 441 459.
30. Muirhead, C.A. 2001. Consequences of population structure on genes under balancing selection. Evolution 55 : 1532 1541.
31. Nagylaki, T. 1975. Deterministic behavior of self-incompatibility alleles. Genetics 79 : 545 550.
32. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University, New York.
33. de Nettancourt, D. 2001. Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
34. Nybom, H. 2004. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol. Ecol. 13 : 1143 1155.
35. O'donnell, S., Lane, M.D. Lawrence, M.J. 1993. The population genetics of the self-incompatibility polymorphism in Papaver Rhoeas.6. Estimation of the overlap between the allelic complements of a pair of populations. Heredity 71 : 591 595.
36. Raspé, O. Kohn, J.R. 2007. Population structure at the S-locus of Sorbus aucuparia L. (Rosaceae : Maloideae). Mol. Ecol. 16 : 1315 1325.
37. Richman, A.D., Kao, T.H., Schaeffer, S.W. Uyenoyama, M.K. 1995. S-allele sequence diversity in natural populations of Solanum Carolinense (HORSENETTLE). Heredity 75 : 405 415.
38. Schierup, M.H. 1998. The Number of Self-Incompatibility Alleles in a Finite, Subdivided Population. Genetics 149 : 1153 1162.
39. Schierup, M.H., Vekemans, X. Charlesworth, D. 2000a. The effect of subdivision on variation at multi-allelic loci under balancing selection. Genet. Res. 76 : 51 62.
40. Schierup, M.H., Charlesworth, D. Vekemans, X. 2000b. The effect of hitch-hiking on genes linked to a balanced polymorphism in a subdivided population. Genet. Res. 76 : 63 73.
41. Schueler, S., Tusch, A. Scholz, F. 2006. Comparative analysis of the within-population genetic structure in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) at the self-incompatibility locus and nuclear microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 15 : 3231 3243.
42. Sokal, R. Rohlf, F. 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
43. Sonneveld, T., Tobutt, K.R. Robbins, T.P. 2003. Allele-specific PCR detection of sweet cherry self-incompatibility (S) alleles S1 to S16 using consensus and allele-specific primers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107 : 1059 1070.
44. Sonneveld, T., Robbins, T.P. Tobutt, K.R. 2006. Improved discrimination of self-incompatibility S-RNase alleles in cherry and high throughput genotyping by automated sizing of first intron polymerase chain reaction products. Plant Breed. 125 : 305 307.
45. Sosinski, B., Gannavarapu, M., Hager, L.D., Beck, L.E., King, G.J., Ryder, C.D., Rajapakse, S., Baird, W.V., Ballard, R.E. Abbott, A.G. 2000. Characterization of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101 : 421 428.
46. Stoeckel, S., Grange, J., Fernandez-Manjarres, J.F., Bilger, I., Frascaria-Lacoste, N. Mariette, S. 2006. Heterozygote excess in a self-incompatible and partially clonal forest tree species - Prunus avium L. Mol. Ecol. 15 : 2109 2118.
47. Tavaud, M. 2002. Diversité du Cerisier doux (Prunus avium L.) sur son Aire de Répartition : Comparaison Avec ses Espèces Apparentées (P. cerasus et P. gondouinii) et son Compartiment Sauvage. INRA Bordeaux, ENSAM, Montpellier, France : 98.
48. Testolin, R., Marrazzo, T., Cipriani, G., Quarta, R., Verde, I., Dettori, M.T., Pancaldi, M. Sansavini, S. 2000. Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome 43 : 512 520.
49. Uyenoyama, M.K. 1997. Genealogical structure among alleles regulating self-incompatibility in natural populations of flowering plants. Genetics 147 : 1389 1400.
50. Vekemans, X. Slatkin, M. 1994. Gene and allelic genealogies at a gametophytic self-incompatibility locus. Genetics 137 : 1157 1165.
51. Weir, B.S. Cockerham, C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution 38 : 1358 1370.
52. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in mendelian populations. Genetics 16 : 97 159.
53. Wright, S. 1939. The distribution of self-sterility alleles in populations. Genetics 24 : 538 552.