Probabilistic evaluation of seismic performance of 3-story 3D one- and two-way steel moment-frame structures

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 681-696

  Tagawa, Hiroyuki ^a   MacRae, Gregory ^b   Lowes, Laura ^c  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^c University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

3D analysis; Beam depth effects; Demand and capacity; Performance based seismic design; Seismic reliability; Steel moment resisting frame structure

Indexed keywords

CONNECTORS (STRUCTURAL); EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; PROBABILITY; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

BEAM-DEPTH EFFECTS; SEISMIC RELIABILITY; STEEL MOMENT-FRAME STRUCTURES;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTION; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; ROTATION; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STEEL STRUCTURE;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; JAPAN; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 42049093383     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.778     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Nakashima M, Roeder C, Maruoka Y. Steel moment frames for earthquakes in United States and Japan. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2000; 126(8):861-868.
2. Roeder CW. Redundancy and ductility in steel moment frames. UCB/ EERC-97/05. The EERC-CUREe Symposium in Honor of Vitelmo V. Bertero (EERC), UCB, 1997.
3. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger R, Foutch D. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2002; 128(4):526-533.
4. Cornell A, Krawinkler H. A framework for performance based seismic design. Proceedings of the 2001 Structures Congress and Exposition, Washington, DC, 2001.
5. MacRae GA, Tagawa, H, Seismic behavior of 3D steel moment frame with biaxial columns. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2001; 127(5):490-497.
6. International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). 1997 Uniform Building Code. Whittier, CA, 1997.
7. Roeder CW. Connection performance state of art report, FEMA. Report No. 355D, Washington, DC, 2001.
8. Luco N, Mori Y, Funabashi Y, Cornell C, Nakashima M. Evaluation of predictors of non-linear seismic demands using 'fishbone' models of SMRF buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32: 2267-2288.
9. Tagawa H. Toward an understanding of seismic performance of 3D structures - stability & reliability. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, U.S.A., 2005.
10. Somerville P et al. Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project. Report No. SAC/BD97/04, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA, 1997.
11. Powell GH, Campbell S. DRAIN-3DX Base Program Description and User Guide, Version 1.10, UBC/SEMM-94/07, UC, Berkely, Report No. UBC/ SEMM-94/07,08, 1994.
12. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3):491-514.
13. FEMA. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, FEMA-350, Washington, DC, 2000.
14. Nowak A, Collins K. Reliability of Structures. McGraw-Hill: New York, 2000.