Comparative scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of different dental conditioners on dentin micromorphology

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 100-105

  Susin, Alexandre Henrique ^a,b   Alves, Luana Severo ^a   De Melo, Gliciana Piovesan ^a   Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adhesive system; Dental conditioners; Self etching adhesives

Indexed keywords

EID: 42049091417     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572008000200004     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34:849-53.
2. Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1035-42.
3. Chersoni S, Suppa P, Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Yiu C, et al. In vivo and in vitro permeability of one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2004;83(6):459-64.
4. Gregoire G, Millas A. Microscopic evaluation of dentin interface obtained with 10 contemporary self-etching systems: correlation with their pH. Oper Dent. 2005;30(4):481-91.
5. Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17:122-6.
6. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, Andrade MAC, Vieira LCC. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspective. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(3):213-24.
7. Montes MAJR, Goes MF, Sinhoreti MAC. The in vitro morphological effects of some current pre-treatments on dentin surface: a SEM evaluation. Oper Dent. 2005;30(2):201-12.
8. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16:165-73.
9. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabea LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall Jr GW. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater. 2003;19:758-67.
10. Perdigão J, Ramos JC, Lambrechts P. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mater. 1997;13:218-27.
11. Schilke R, Lisson JA, Bauss O, Geurtsen W. Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45:355-61.
12. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17(4):296-308.
13. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;11:726-31.
14. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho R, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2(2):83-98.
15. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-35.
16. Wang Y, Spencer P. Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res. 2005;84(4):350-4.
17. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi M, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a Phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res.1994;73:1212-20.