Unfunded public employee health care benefits and GASB No. 45

Accounting Horizons

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 245-263

  Berman, Eric S ^b   Keating, Elizabeth K ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41949130172     PISSN: 08887993     EISSN: 15587975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/acch.2007.21.3.245     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ackerman, A. 2006. Maryland omitted OPEB estimate in OS. Bond Buyer (April 11).
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2003. 2003 employer-sponsored health insurance data from the medical expenditure panel survey. Available at: http://www.meps.ahcpr.gov/MEPSDATA/ic/2003/Index403.htm.
3. Amir, E., and E. A. Gordon. 1996. Firms' choice of estimation parameters: Empirical evidence from SFAS No. 106. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 11 (3).
4. _, and A. Ziv. 1997. Recognition, disclosure, or delay: Timing the adoption of SEAS No. 106. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (1): 61-81.
5. Aon Consulting. 2006. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Post Employment Benefit Plans other than Pensions Actuarial Valuation (June 17).
6. Bloomberg, M. 2006. Mayor Bloomberg presents $52.7 billion FY 2007 executive budget. Press release, May 4.
7. Cauchon, D. 2006. Huge bill for public retirees hits soon. USA Today (May 18): A1.
8. City of Newton, Massachusetts. 2005. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Available at: http://www.ci.newton.ma.us/Comptrol/Audited%20reports. htm.
9. City of Orlando, Florida. 2004. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Available at: http://www.ci/orlando.fl.us/admin/accounting/2004cafr. pdf.
10. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 2007. Governor's Fiscal 2008 Budget Proposal and House Ways and Means Committee Fiscal 2008 Budget Proposal. Available at: http://www.mass.gov/bb/fy2008h1/ and http://www.mass.gov/legis/ 08budget/house/waysmeans.htm.
11. D'Souza, J., J. Jacob, and K. Ramesh. 2000. The use of accounting flexibility to reduce labor renegotiation costs and manage earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (2).
12. Elder, J. 2007. Texas revolts against benefits reporting rule. American-Statesman (March 8).
13. Employee Benefit Research Institute. 2005a. Benefit Cost Comparisons between State and Local Government and Private-Sector Employers (April). Available at: http://www.ebri.org/pdf/notespdf/0405notes.pdf.
14. _. 2005b. Employment-Based Health Benefits: Trends in Access and Coverage Employee Benefit Research. Issue Brief 284, August.
15. _. 2005c. The Impact of the Erosion of Retiree Health Benefits on Workers and Retirees. Issue Brief 279, March.
16. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 1980. Accounting and Reporting by Defined Benefit Pension Plans. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 35. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
17. _. 1982. Deferral of the Effective Date of Certain Accounting Requirements for Pension Plans of State and Local Governmental Units-An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 35. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 59. Norwalk, CT: EASB.
18. _. 1990. Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
19. Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB). 1990. Disclosure of Information on Post-Employment Benefits Other Than Pension Benefits by State and Local Governmental Employers. Statement No. 12. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
20. _. 1997. Accounting for Pensions by State and Local Government Employers. Statement No. 27. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
21. _. 1999. Basic Financial Statements - and Management's Discussion and Analysis - For State and Local Governments. Statement No. 34. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
22. _. 2004. Financial Reporting for Post-Employment Benefit Plans Other Than Pension Plans. Statement No. 43. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
23. _. 2004. Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Post-Employment Benefits Other Than Pensions. Statement No. 45. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
24. _. 2006a. Why Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting Is - And Should Be - Different. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
25. _. 2006b. Other Post-Employment Benefits: A Plain-Language Summary of GASB Statements No. 43 and No. 45. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
26. _. 2006c. Medicare Part D Payments to State and Local Governments. Technical Bulletin No. 2006-1. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
27. Government Finance Officers Association of Texas (GFOAT). 2007. GASB or Legislators-Who Should Set Accounting Standards? Available at: http://gfoat.org.
28. Haddad, M. M., S. Z. Barr, A. L. Redman, M. M. Haddad, and A. Cowan. 1995. Adoption of FASB 106 and stock prices. International Advances in Economic Research 1 (May): 156-163.
29. Laskey, A., R. Raphael, R. Greene, D. Litvack, D. Offerman, and A. Doppelt. 2007. Old promises, emerging bills considering OPEB in public finance ratings. Public Finance: Tax-Supported Special Report (March 22).
30. Mason, J. D., A. S. Doppelt, A. R. Laskey, and D. T. Litvack. 2005. The not so golden years, credit implications of GASB 45. Fitch Ratings Public Finance Special Report (June 22): 2.
31. McTague, J. 2006. The trillion-dollar pothole. Barron's Magazine (March 13): 37.
32. Moody's Investors Service. 2005. Other post-employment benefits (OPEB) (July). Available at: https://www.csac.counties.org/images/public/Services/ OPEBS_moodys.pdf.
33. _. 2006. Survey shows that cost of other post-employment benefits (OPEB) for the largest U.S. cities outpaces inflation. (December).
34. Ohio Public Employees Retirement System. 2004. The comprehensive annual financial report. Available at: http://www.opers.org/pubs-archive/ investments/cafr/2004cafr.pdf.
35. Shields, Y. 2006a. Raters don't expect immediate OPEB effects. Bond Buyer (April 3): 1.
36. _. 2006b. Well-Funded pensions and OPEBs are ways to score points. Bond Buyer (March 30): 53A.
37. Standard & Poor's. 2004. Reporting and credit implications of GASB 45 statement on other post-employment benefits. December 1. Available at: http://www.westvirginia.com/peia/content/WV%20OPEB%20Final%20Report%202005%206- 30-06%20(corrected%20page%203).pdf.
38. _. 2005. S&P 500 companies significantly under funded for other post employment benefits (OPEB). Extract, December 19. Available at: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-5047543-ITM.
39. State of Alaska. 2005. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Available at: http://fin.admin.state.ak.us/dof/financial_reports/cafr_toc.jsp.
40. State of Rhode Island. 2006. 2007 State of the State. Available at: http://www.governor.ri.gov/other/statemessage07.php.
41. Supreme Court of the State of Michigan. 2005. Alberta Studier, et al., vs. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement Board, et al. No. 125765 and 125766. (June 28): 2-6.
42. Supreme Court of the State of Utah. 2006. Utah Public Employees Association and Roes 1 through 5 v. State of Utah, No. 20051121. (February 16): 1-17.
43. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2006. Public Employment and Payroll Data. Washington, D.C.: Government. Printing Office. Available at: http://www.census.gov/govs/www/apes.html.
44. Wisniewski, S. C. 2005. Potential state government practices impact of the new GASB accounting standard for retiree health benefits. Public Budgeting and Finance 25 (1): 104-118.
45. Zion, D., and A. Varshney. 2007. You Dropped a Bomb on Me, GASB: Uncovering $1.5 Trillion in Hidden OPEB Liabilities for State and Local Governments. New York, NY: Credit Suisse Equity Research - Mercer Human Resource Consulting.