Outcomes of Varicocelectomy Treatment: An Updated Critical Analysis

Urologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 191-209

  Richardson, Ingride ^a   Grotas, Aaron B ^a   Nagler, Harris M ^a,b  

^a BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOMIFENE CITRATE;

ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; AZOOSPERMIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCLEROTHERAPY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOGENESIS; SPERMATOZOON DENSITY; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VARICOCELE; VARICOCELECTOMY;

CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, MALE; MALE; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; SPERM COUNT; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VARICOCELE;

EID: 41949117953     PISSN: 00940143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2008.01.007     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Schlesinger M.H., Wilets I.F., and Nagler H.M. Treatment outcome after varicolectomy. A critical analysis. Urol Clin North Am 21 3 (1994) 517-529
2. Nieschlag E., Hertle L., Fischedick A., et al. Update on treatment of varicocele: counseling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermatica. Hum Reprod 13 8 (1998) 2147-2150
3. Madgar I., Weissenberg R., Lunenfeld B., et al. Controlled trial of high spermatic vein ligation for varicocele in infertile men. Fertil Steril 63 1 (1995) 120-124
4. Krause W., Muller H., Schafer H., et al. Does treatment of varicocele improve male fertility? Results of the "Deutsche Varikozelenstudie", a multicentre study of 14 collaborating centres. Andrologia 34 (2002) 164-171
5. Grasso M., Lania C., Castelli M., et al. Low-grade left varicocele in patients over 30 years old: the effect of spermatic vein ligation on fertility. BJU Int 85 (2000) 305-307
6. Unal D., Yeni E., Verit A., et al. Clomiphene citrate versus varicocelectomy in the treatment of subclinical varicocele: a prospective randomized study. Int J Urol 8 (2001) 227-230
7. Yamamoto M., Hibi H., Hirata Y., et al. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate in patients with subclinical varicocele: a randomized prospective controlled study. J Urol 155 5 (1996) 1636-1638
8. Breznik R., Vlaisavljevic V., and Borko E. Treatment of varicocelectomy and male fertility. Arch Androl 30 (1993) 157-160
9. Vermeulen A., Vandeweghe M., and Deslypere J. Prognosis of subfertility in men with corrected or uncorrected varicocele. J Androl 7 (1986) 147-155
10. Baker H.W., Burger H.G., Kretser D.M., et al. Testicular vein ligation and fertility in men with varicoceles. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 291 (1985) 1678-1680
11. Nilsson S., Edvinsson A., and Nilsson B. Improvement of semen and pregnancy rate after ligation and division of the internal spermatic vein: fact or fiction?. Br J Urol 51 (1979) 591-596
12. Nieschlag E., Hertle L., Fishedick A., et al. Treatment of varicocele: counselling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermaticea. Hum Reprod 10 2 (1995) 347-353
13. Polito Jr. M., Muzzonigro G., Centini R., et al. Percutaneous therapy of varicocele: effects on semen parameters in young adults. Urol Int 72 2 (2004) 150-153
14. Onazawa M., Endo F., Suetomi T., et al. Clinical study of varicocele: statistical analysis and the results of long-term follow-up. Int J Urol 9 (2002) 455-461
15. Jungwirth A., Gogus C., Hauser W., et al. Clinical outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in infertile men. Andrologia 33 (2001) 71-74
16. Pasqualotto F., Lucon A., Goes P., et al. Testicular growth, sperm concentration, percent motility, and pregnancy outcome after varicocelectomy based on testicular histology. Fertil Steril 83 (2005) 362-366
17. Marks J.L., McMahon R., and Lipshultz L.I. Predictive parameters of successful varicocele repair. J Urol 136 (1986) 609-612
18. The Male Infertility Best Practice Policy Committee of the American Urological Association and The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Report on varicocele and infertility. Fertil Steril 82 1 (2004) 142-145
19. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 3rd edition (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK)
20. Dohle G., Pierik F., and Weber R. Does varicocele repair result in more spontaneous pregnancies? A randomized prospective trial. J Urol 169 4 (2003) 408 [A1525]
21. Hargreave T.B. Varicocele: overview and commentary on the results of the WHO varicocele trial. Current advances in andrology. Proceedings of the VIth International Congress of Andrology, Salzburg, Austria, May 25-29, 1997 (1997), Monduzzi Editore S.P.A., Bologna (Italy) 31-44
22. Evers J.L., and Collins J.A. Surgery or embolisation for varicocele in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 (2004) 10.1002/14651858 CD000479.pub2
23. Evers J., and Collins J. Assessment of efficacy of varicocele repair for male subfertility: a systematic review. Lancet 361 (2003) 1849-1852
24. Egger M., Davey Smith G., Schneider M., et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315 (1997) 629-634
25. Ficarra V., Cerruto M.A., Liguor G., et al. Treatment of varicocele in subfertile men: the Cochrane review-a contrary opinion. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 258-263
26. Marmar J., Agarwal A., Prabakaran S., et al. Reassesing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 88 (2007) 639-648
27. Grotas A, Nagler HM. Varicocele. In: Lipshultz L, editor. Infertility and the male. in press.
28. Galarneau G., and Nagler H. Cost-effective infertility therapies in the '90s: to treat or to cure?. Contemp Urol 11 (1999) 32-45
29. Cayan S., Erdemir F., Ozbey I., et al. Can varicocelectomy significantly change the way couples use assisted reproductive technologies?. J Urol 167 (2002) 1749-1752
30. Schlegel P. Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Urology 49 (1997) 83-90
31. Al-Kandari A., Shabaab H., Ibrahim H., et al. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urology 69 3 (2007) 417-420
32. Hsieh M., Huang S., Chen Y., et al. High inguinal loupe-assisted varicocelectomy for subfertile men with varicoceles: technical feasibility, clinical outcomes and complications. Arch Androl 52 (2006) 179-183
33. Marmar J., and Benoff S. The safety of ultrasound guided testis aspiration biopsies and efficacy of use to predict varicocelectomy outcome. Hum Reprod 20 8 (2005) 2279-2288
34. Libman J., Jarvi K., and Lo K. Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy is superior for men with bilateral versus unilateral repair. J Urol 176 (2006) 2602-2605
35. Hussein A.F. The role of color Doppler ultrasound in prediction of the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. J Urol 176 5 (2006) 1912-1913
36. Zucchi A., and Mearini L. Varicocele and fertility: relationship between testicular volume and seminal parameters before and after treatment. J Androl 27 4 (2006) 548-551
37. Orhan I., Onur R., Semercioz A., et al. Comparison of two different microsurgical methods in the treatment of varicocele. Arch Androl 51 (2005) 213-220
38. Zini A., Blumenfeld A., Libman J., et al. Beneficial effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on human sperm DNA integrity. Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 1018-1021
39. Gat Y., Bachar G., Everaert K., et al. Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men after internal spermatic vein embolization for the treatment of varicocele. Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 1013-1017
40. Watanabe M., Nagai A., Kusumi N., et al. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches. Int J Urol 12 (2005) 892-898
41. Grober E.D., Chan P.T., Zini A., et al. Microsurgical treatment of persistent or recurrent varicocele. Fertil Steril 82 3 (2004) 718-722
42. Kibar Y., Seckin B., and Erduran D. The effects of subinguinal varicocelectomy on Kruger morphology and semen parameters. J Urol 168 (2002) 1071-1074
43. Cayan S., Kadioglu T., Tefekli A., et al. Comparison of results and complication of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele. Urology 55 (2000) 750-754
44. Scherr D., and Goldstein M. Comparison of bilateral versus unilateral varicocelectomy in men with palpable bilateral varicoceles. J Urol 162 (1999) 85-88
45. Vazquez-Levin M., Friedmann P., Goldberg S., et al. Response of routine semen analysis and critical assessment of sperm morphology by Kruger classification to therapeutic varicocelectomy. J Urol 158 (1997) 1804-1807
46. Seftel A., Rutchik S., Chen H., et al. Effects of subinguinal varicocele ligation on sperm concentration, motility, and Kruger morphology. J Urol 158 (1997) 1800-1803
47. Jarow J., Ogle S., and Eskew A. Seminal improvement following repair of ultrasound detected subclinical varicoceles. J Urol 155 (1996) 1287-1290
48. Richardson I, Nagler H. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is not necessary for microsurgical varicocelectomy. Presented at New York Academy of Medicine 57th Annual Valentine Essay Contest, New York; March 2007.
49. Steckel J., Dicker A., and Goldstein M. Relationship between varicocele size and response to varicocelectomy. J Urol 149 (1993) 769-771
50. Richardson I., and Nagler H. Is bilateral varicocele more detrimental to male fertility than unilateral varicocele?. Nat Clin Pract Urol 4 (2007) 366-367
51. Grasso M., Lania C., Castelli M., et al. Bilateral varicocele: impact of right spermatic vein ligation on fertility. J Urol 153 (1995) 1847-1848
52. Dubin L., and Amelar R.D. Varicocele. Urol Clin North Am 5 3 (1978) 563-572
53. Ramasamy R., and Schlegel P.N. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery. Urology 68 6 (2006) 1323-1326
54. Nabi G., Asterlings S., Greene D., et al. Percutaneous embolization of varicoceles: outcomes and correlation of semen improvement with pregnancy. Urology 64 (2004) 359-363
55. Kadioglu A., Tefekli A., Cayan S., et al. Microsurgical inguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men. Urology 57 (2001) 328-333
56. Esteves S., and Glina S. Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele in azoospermic men based on testicular histology. Int Braz J Urol 31 (2005) 541-548
57. Shik Lee J., Park H.J., and Seo J.T. What is the indication of varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia?. Urology 69 (2007) 352-355
58. Tulloch W.S. Varicocele in subfertility: results of treatment. BMJ 2 (1955) 356-358
59. Ribe N., Manasia P., Sarquella J., et al. Clinical follow-up after subinguinal varicocele ligation to treat pain. Arch Ital Urol Androl 74 (2002) 51-53
60. Donkol R., and Salem T. Paternity after varicocelectomy: preoperative sonographic parameters of success. J Ultrasound Med 26 (2007) 593-599
61. Perimenis P., Markou S., Gyftopoulous K., et al. Effect of subinguinal varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate: a two-group study. Eur Urol 39 (2001) 322-325
62. Segenreich E., Israilov S., Shmuele J., et al. Evaluation of the relationship between semen parameters, pregnancy rate of wives of infertile men with varicocele, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone test before and after varicocelectomy. Urology 52 (1998) 853-857
63. Abdulmaaboud M., Shokeir A., Farage Y., et al. Treatment of varicocele: a comparative study of conventional open surgery, percutaneous retrograde sclerotherapy, and laparoscopy. Urology 52 (1998) 294-300
64. Aşci R., Sarikaya S., Büyükalpelli R., et al. The outcome of varicocelectomy in subfertile men with an absent or atrophic right testis. Br J Urol 81 5 (1998) 750-752
65. Pasqualotto F., Lucon A., Hallak J., et al. Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men after varicocele repair. Hum Reprod 18 (2003) 108-112
66. Kim E., Leibman B., Grinblat D., et al. Varicocele repair improves semen parameters in azoospermic men with spermatogenic failure. J Urol 162 (1999) 737-740
67. Matthews G., Matthews E., and Goldstein M. Induction of spermatogenesis and achievement of pregnancy after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with azoospermia and severe oligoasthenospermia. Fertil Steril 70 (1998) 71-75
68. Al-Buheissi S., Patel H., Wazait H., et al. Predictors of success in surgical ligation of painful varicocele. Urol Int 79 (2007) 33-36
69. Maghraby H. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy for painful varicoceles: merits and outcomes. J Endourol 16 (2002) 107-110
70. Karademir K., Senkul T., Baykal K., et al. Evaluation of the role of varicocelectomy including external spermatic vein ligation in patients with scrotal pain. Int J Urol 12 (2005) 484-488
71. Yaman O., Ozdiler E., Anafarta K., et al. Effect of microsurgical subinguinal varicocele ligation to treat pain. Urology 55 (2000) 107-108
72. Meng M., Green K., and Turek P. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol 174 (2005) 1926-1931
73. Allamaneni S.S., Naughton C.K., Sharma R.K., et al. Increased seminal reactive oxygen species levels in patients with varicoceles correlate with varicocele grade but not with testis size. Fertil Steril 82 6 (2004) 1684-1686
74. Fuse H., Iwasaki M., Mizuno I., et al. Evaluation of acrosome reactivity using the Acrobeads test in varicocele patients: findings before and after treatment. Arch Androl 49 1 (2003) 1-6
75. Obrien J., and Zini A. Sperm DNA integrity and male infertility. Urology 65 (2005) 16-22
76. Pryor J., and Howards S. Varicocele. Urol Clin North Am 14 (1987) 499-513