Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) and Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive ability: A concurrent validity study

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 305-320

  Jones, W Paul ^a   Loe, Scott A ^a   Krach, S Kathleen ^a   Rager, Rhiannon Y ^a   Jones, Heather M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT METRICS BATTERY; COGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE TEST; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RESPONSE TIME; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDITY; WOODCOCK JOHNSON III TEST;

ADULT; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; INTELLIGENCE TESTS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 41949116990     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: 17444144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13854040701281483     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bleiberg, J., Cernich, A. N., Cameron, K., Sun, W., Peck, K., Uhorchak, J., et al. (2004). Duration of cognitive impairment following sports concussion. Neurosurgery, 54(5), 1073-1080.
2. Bleiberg, J., Kane, R. L., Reeves, D. L., Garmoe, W. S., & Halpern, E. (2000). Factor analysis of computerized and traditional tests used in mild brain injury research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 287-294.
3. Brinkman, J. J. Jr., Decker, S. L., & Dean, R. S. (2005). Assessing and understanding brain function through neuropsychologically based ability tests. In R. D'Amato, E. Fletcher-Janzen, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of school neuropsychology (pp. 303-326). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4. Carper, M. S. (2003). A concurrent validity study comparing executive functioning of the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Ability and the NEPSY. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX, USA.
5. Dean, R. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (1999). The WJ-R and Bateria-R in neuropsychological assessment. (Research Report Number 3). Riverside Publishing. Retrieved October 1, 2006, from http://www.riverpub.com/products/ wjIIICognitive/pdf/DeanWoodcockRR3.pdf
6. Flanagan, D. P., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.). (2005). Contemporary intellectual assessment, second edition: Theories, tests, and issues. New York: Guilford Press.
7. Gamache, G., Levinson, D., Reeves, D., Bidyuk, P., & Brantley, K. (2005). Longitudinal assessments of cognitive performance as effected by the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 81-93.
8. Gestaldo, E., Reeves, D., Levinson, D., & Winger, C. B. (1997). ANAM normative data: USMC-1995 hyponatremia outbreak studies. San Diego, CA: National Cognitive Recovery Foundation.
9. Gestaldo, E., Reeves, D., Levinson, D., & Winger, B. (2001). ANAM USMC normative data: Effects of heat stress on neurocognitive performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 825-826.
10. Gottschalk, L., Bechtel, R., Maguire, G., Katz, M., Levinson, D., Harrington, D., et al. (2002). Computer detection of cognitive impairment and associated neuropsychiatric dimensions from the content analysis of verbal samples. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 28, 653-670.
11. Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Hale, J. B., & Fiorello, C. A. (2004). School neuropsychology. New York: Guilford Press.
13. Holliday, S. L., Navarrete, M. G., Hermosillo-Romo, D., Valdez, C. R., Saklad, A. R., Escalante, A., et al. (2003). Validating a computerized neuropsychological test battery for mixed ethnic lupus patients. Lupus, 12, 697-703.
14. Houck, T. (1993). Neuropsychological properties of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability: Memory cluster and memory and learning subtests. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(12-B), 6554-6555.
15. Jones, W. P. (2003). Relative scaling for online administration of timed tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 798.
16. Kabat, M. H., Kane, R. L., Jefferson, A. L., & DiPino, R. K. (2001). Construct validity of selected Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) battery measures. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 498-507.
17. Korkman, M. Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. (1998). NEPSY: A developmental neuropsychological assessment manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
18. Levinson, D. M., & Reeves, D. L. (1997). Monitoring recovery from traumatic brain injury using Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM V1.0). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 12, 155-166.
19. Levinson, D. M., Reeves, D. L., Watson, J., & Harrison, M. (2005). Automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM) measures of cognitive effects of Alzheimer's disease. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 403-408.
20. Lewandowski, A. G., Dietz, A. J., & Reeves, D. L. (1995). A neuropsychologic-pharmacodynamic paradigm for demonstrating cognitive enhancement and suppression in the elderly Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 357-358.
21. Lewandowski, A., Reeves, D., Kane, R., & Spector, J. (2000). A Phase III clinical trial using a comprehensive neuropsychological battery to assess the effects of over-the-counter medication on cognitive functioning in the elderly. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 752-753.
22. Lewandowski, A., Spector, J., & Reeves, D. (1997). Assessing inconsistency in neuropsychological data sets: Identification of motivation and effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 12, 356-357.
23. Reeves, D. L., Bleiberg, J., Roebuck-Spencer, T., Cernich, A. N., Schwab, K., Ivins, B., et al. (2006). Reference values for performance on the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics V.3.0 in an active duty military sample. Military Medicine, 171, 982-994.
24. Reeves, D., Winter, K., Culligan, K., LaCour, S., Raynsford, K., Elsmore, T., et al. (2001). Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM 2001). Pensacola, FL: Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command.
25. Schlegel, R. E., Gilliland, K., & Crabtree, M. S. (1992). Development of the UTC-PAB Normative Database: Technical Report. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
26. Schrank, F. A., Flanagan, D. P., Woodcock, R., & Mascolo, J. T. (2002). Essentials of the WJ-III Cognitive Abilities Assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
27. Taylor, D. J. & McFatter, R. M. (2003). Cognitive performance after sleep deprivation: Does personality make a difference? Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1179-1193.
28. Tupper, D. E. (1990). Some observations on the use of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability in adults with head injury. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(5), 306-310.
29. Vasterling, J. J., Proctor, S. P., Amoroso, P., Kane, R., Heeren, T., & White, R. F. (2006). Neuropsychological outcomes of army personnel following deployment to the Iraq war. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 519-529.
30. Wasielewski, S. (1998). Discrimination of brain-damaged, depressed, and normal subjects using the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilites-Revised. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ball State University, IN, USA.
31. Wilken, J. A., Kane, R. L., Sullivan, C. L., Wallin, M., Usiskin, J. B., Quig, M. E., et al. (2003). The utility of computerized neuropsychological assessment of cognitive dysfunction in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 9, 119-127.
32. Woodcock, R. W. & Johnson, M. B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
33. Woodcock, R. W. & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
34. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ-III). Itasca, IL: Riverside.