The effect of computer assisted instruction on the achievement of students on the instruction of physics topic of 7th grade science course at a primary school

Journal of Applied Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1067-1072

  Kara, Izzet ^a   Kahraman, Özkan ^a  

^a PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Computer Assisted instruction; Force; Pressure; Science teaching

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION; PRESSURE; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS; COMPUTER ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CONTROL GROUPS; FORCE; PRIMARY SCHOOLS; SCIENCE COURSE; SCIENCE TEACHING; TRADITIONAL INSTRUCTION;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 41949105883     PISSN: 18125654     EISSN: 18125662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2008.1067.1072     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akçay, H., C. Tüysüz and B. Feyzioǧlu, 2003. An example of effect of computer assisted science instruction on he students' achievement and attitude: Mole concept and avagadro number. The Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., 2 (2).
2. Akpinar, E., H. Aktamis and Ö. Ergin, 2005. The Students' view on the use of Educational Technology in Science Course. Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., 4 (1).
3. Alacapinar, F.G., 2003. The effect of traditional education and education via computer on the students' gain. Eurasian J. Educ. Res., 10: 40-45.
4. Anonim, 1997. The Use of Educational Technology in Physics Instruction, Higher Education Institute, http://www.yok.gov.tr/egitim/ogretmen/ kitaplar/fizik/u10.doc; (08.06.2007).
5. Bayraktar, Ş., 2001. A meta analysis of the effectiveness of computer assisted instruction in science education. J. Res. Technol. Educ., 34 (2): 173-188.
6. Bozdoǧan, A.E. and N. Yalçin, 2005. Attitudes of primary 6th, 7th and 8th grade students towards physics subjects of science lesson. Gazi University. Kιrşehir Educ. Fac., 6 (1): 241-247.
7. Brooks, D.N., 2005. Are we there yet?: Mapping skills computer aided instruction. M.S. Thesis, California University, Dominguez Hills.
8. Brophy, A.K., 1999. Is computer assisted instruction effective in the science classroom? M.S. Thesis, California State University, Dominguez Hills.
9. Bryan, J., 2006. Technology for physics instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 6 (2).
10. Carter, M.B., 2004. An analysis and comparison of the effects of computer assisted instruction versus traditional lecture instruction students attitudes and achievement in a college remedial mathematics course. Ph.D Thesis, Temple University. Philadelphia.
11. Child, J., 1995. Assessing the impact of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) in undergraduate Latin American Studies Courses 19. International Congress of Latin American Studies Association, Washington, pp: 1-24.
12. Cotton, K., 1991. Computer Assisted Instruction, School Improvement Research Series, http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/5/cu10.html (11.05.2007).
13. Çekbaş, Y., H. Yakar, B. Yildirim and A. Savran, 2003. The Effect of Computer Assisted Instruction on Students. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol., 2 (4).
14. Çepni, S., T. Özsevgeç, F. Sayilkan and F.B. Emre, 2004. The Comparison of achievement levels of science teaching program students at two universities. V. International Science and Mathematics Education Congress Report, Volume II, Ankara, pp: 1241-1246.
15. Çepni, S., E. Taş and S. Köse, 2006. The effects of computer assisted materials on students' cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitude toward science. Comput. Educ., 46: 192-205.
16. Demirci, H.G., 2006. Relationship between the Students' Attitude towards internet and academic achievement in internet network systems lessons. M S Thesis, Çukurova University, Computer and Educational Technologies, Adana.
17. Demircioǧlu, H. and Ö. Geban, 1996. The comparison of computer assisted instruction and traditional problem solving activities in science teaching in terms of course achievement Hacettepe University. Fac. Educ. Mag., 12: 183-185.
18. Demirel, Ö., 2004. Planning and Evaluation in Instruction. Art of Teaching. Pegem Publication
19. Demirel, Ö. and E. Yaǧci, 2006. Principles and methods of Instruction. Feza Journalism.
20. Halls, I., 2002. Instructional Technologies and Material Development. Nobel Publication and Distribution
21. Hançer, A.H., Ö. Şensoy and H.I. Yildirim, 2003. The importance of primary school modern science instruction and an evaluation on to how it should be J. Pamukkale Univ. Educ. Fac., 13: 88-96.
22. Ivowi, U.M.O., 1984. Misconceptions in physics amongst Nigerian secondary school students. Phys. Educ., 19: 280-285.
23. Karamustafaoǧlu, O., M. Aydin and H. Özmen, 2005. The Effect of Computer Assisted Physics Activities on Students' gains: Simple Harmonic Motion Example. The Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., 4 (4).
24. Küçükahmet, L., 2001. Instructional Principles and Methods. Nobel Publication and Distribution.
25. Liao, Y.C., 2007. Effects computer assisted instruction on students' achievement in Taiwan: A meta analysis. Comput. Educ., 2007 (48): 216-233.
26. London, N., 2005. A field test of CAI software: A journey through the solar system. MS Thesis, California State University, Dominguez Hills.
27. Mayer, R.E., 2003. The promise of multimedia leaning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learn. Instruct., 13 (2): 125-139.
28. Moodly, S., 2004. The effects of computer based dynamic visualisation simulation on student leaning in high school science. Ph.D Thesis, Boston University, Boston.
29. Morse, R.H., 1991. Computer uses in secondary science education. ERIC Digest, ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources, http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/ 0000000b/80/2a/14/4c.pdf (15.06.2007).
30. Preciado, C., 2004. Computer assisted instruction field test: Systems of equations. MS Thesis, California State University, Dominguez Hills.
31. Schutte, J.G., 1996. Virtual teaching in higher education: The new intellectual superhighway or just another traffic jam? Retrieved 16 September 2003, from http://www.csun.edu/sociology/virexp.htm.
32. Şimşek, N., 2002. The Use of Educational Technology in Lesson for Teachers and Nominee Teachers. Nobel Publication and Distribution.
33. Ünal, G. and Ö. Ergin, 2006. Science education and models. J. Natl. Educ., 171: 188-196.
34. Wilder, D.M., 2006. A field test of CAI software: Introduction to electricity. M.S. Thesis, California University, Dominguez Hills.
35. Yakar, H., 2005. The effect of computer assisted instruction on students' achievement for teaching of newton's movement laws. M.S. Thesis, Pamukkale University Science Institute, Denizli.
36. Yalin, H.I., 2006. Instructional Technologies and Material Development. Nobel Publication and Distribution.
37. Yenice, N, 2003. The effect of computer assisted science teaching on students' science and computer attitudes. The Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., 21 (4).
38. Yiǧit, N. and A.R. Akdeniz, 2003. The effect of computer assisted activities on students' gain at physics instruction: Electrical circuits example. J. Gazi Univ. Educ. Fac., 23 (3): 99-113.
39. Yiǧit, N., 2004. The effectiveness of computer assisted instruction student achievement in physics education. J. Natl. Educ., pp: 161 (In Turkish).