Evaluation of suspended load changes using AnnAGNPS and SWAT semi-empirical erosion models

Catena

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 286-299

  Kliment, Zdeněk ^a   Kadlec, Jiří ^a   Langhammer, Jakub ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

AnnAGNPS; Bl anka river; Czech Republic; Land use changes; Modeling; Soil erosion; Suspended sediment transport; SWAT

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; CATCHMENT; EROSION; LAND USE CHANGE; MODELING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAINFALL; RIVER BASIN; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SUSPENDED LOAD; SUSPENDED SEDIMENT;

BLSANKA BASIN; CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE;

HUMULUS;

EID: 41949095993     PISSN: 03418162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2007.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., and Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment: part I: model development. Journal of American Water Resources Association 34 (1998) 73-89
2. Benaman J., Shoemaker C., and Haith D. Calibration and validation of soil and water assessment tool on an agricultural watershed in upstate New York. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10 (2005) 363-374
3. Beven K. Rainfall-Runoff Modeling - The Primer (2001), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom 360 pp
4. Bicknell B.R., Imhoff J.C., Kittle J.L., and Donigian A.S. Hydrological Simulation Program - Fortran, Version 12, User's Manual (2001), AQUA TERRA Consultants, Mountain View, California, USA
5. Binger R.L., and Theurer F.D. AnnAGNPS technical processes: documentation version 3. Available at (2003). http://www.ars.usda.gov/Research/docs.htm?docid=7000 Accessed 11.10.2006
6. Borah D.K., and Bera M. Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: review of mathematical bases. Transactions of the ASAE 46 (2003) 1553-1566
7. Breuer L., and Frede H. PlaPaDa - an online plant parameter data drill for ecohydrological modeling approaches (2003). http://uni-giessen.de/ Available at: http://uni-giessen.de/~gh1461/plapada/plapada.html. Accessed 5.10.2006
8. Das S., Rudra P.R., Goel P.K., Gupta N., and Gharabaghi B. Evaluation of AnnAGNPS in cold and temperate regions. Water Science and Technology 53 (2006) 263-270
9. De Vente J., and Poesen J. Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: scale issues and semi-quantitative models. Earth-Science Reviews 71 (2005) 95-125
10. Di Luzio M., Srinivasan R., Arnold J.G., and Neitsch S.L. ArcView interface for SWAT User's Manual. Blackland Research Center, Temple, Texas, USA (2002). http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/downloads/doc/swatav2000.pdf Available at http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/downloads/doc/swatav2000.pdf. Accessed 5.10.2006
11. Ewen J., Parkin G., and O'Connel P.E. SHETRAN: distributed river basin flow and transport modeling system. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 5 (2000) 250-258
12. Gobin A., and Govers G. Pan - European erosion risk assessment. 3rd Annual Report - 5th Framework Programme. Ispra, Italy (2003)
13. Grizzetti B., and Bouraoui F. Evaluation of the SWAT model on the Zelivka catchment, Czechia. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Point Research Centre of the European Commission, ISPRA, Italy (2005). http://www.euroharp.org/toolbox/catchment Available at http://www.euroharp.org/toolbox/catchment%20reports/SWAT/Zelivka_SWAT.pdf. Accessed 11.10.2006
14. Holý M., Váška J., and Vrána K. Matematický simulační model srážkoodtokových vztahů a erozních procesů SMODERP. CTU (1989), Faculty of Civil Engineering, Prague, Czechia
15. Janeček M., et al. Ochrana zemědělské půdy před erozí. Metodiky pro zavádění výsledků výzkumu do zemědělské praxe 5, 5-110 (1992), RISWC, Prague, Czechia
16. Jetten V., Govers G., and Hessel R. Erosion models: quality of spatial predictions. Hydrological Processes 17 (2003) 887-900
17. Jha M., Gassman F., Secchi S., Gu R., and Arnold J. Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT flow, sediment and nutrient predictions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40 (2004) 811-825
18. Kliment Z., Langhammer J., and Kadlec J. Suspended sediment load and soil erosion processes in mesoscale catchment areas. In: Goudie S., and Kalvoda J. (Eds). Geomorphological Variations. Prague, Czechia (2007) 221-252
19. Krause P., Boyle D.P., and Bäse F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in Geosciences 5 (2005) 83-87
20. Krysanova V., Hattermann F., and Wechsung F. Implications of complexity and uncertainity for integrated modeling and impact assessment in river basis. Environmental Modeling and Software 22 (2007) 701-709
21. Kutílek J. Vodohospodářská pedologie (1978), SNTL, Prague, Czechia 295 pp.
22. Langhammer J., Kliment Z., and Stehlík J. Modelování zátěže z plošných zdrojů znečištění. Final report of COST 623 (2003), Charles University, Faculty of Science, Prague, Czechia
23. Merritt W.S., Letcher R.A., and Jakeman A.J. A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environmental Modeling and Software 18 (2003) 761-799
24. Morgan R.P.C., Quinton J.N., Smith R.E., Govers G., Poesen J., Auerswald K., Chisci G., Torri D., and Styczen M.E. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23 (1998) 527-544
25. Nash J.E., and Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10 (1978) 282-290
26. Neitsch S.L., Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R., and Williams J.R. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation (Version 2005) (2005). http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/ Available at: http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/. Accessed 11.10.2006
27. Pfennig, B., 2003. Anwendungsspezifischer Verglech Zweier hydrologischer Modellansatze (PRMS und SWAT) in Untersuchungsgebieten mit unterschiedlichen naturraumlichen Ausstattungen. Graduation theses. University of Jena, Germany.
28. Pohlert T., Husman L., Breuer J.A., and Frede H.G. Modeling of point and non-point source pollution of nitrate with SWAT in the river Dill, Germany. Advances in Geosciences 5 (2005) 5-7
29. Renard K.G., Foster G.R., Yoder D.C., and McCool D.K. RUSLE revisited: status, questions, answers, and the future. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49 (1994) 213-220
30. Saxton K.E., and Rawls W.J. Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70 (2006) 1569-1578
31. Schmidt J., Werner M., and Michael A. Application of the EROSION 3D model to the CATSOP watershed, The Netherlands. Catena 37 (1999) 449-456
32. Straková, E., 1998. Srážkové poměry v povodí Blšanky. Graduation theses. Charles University, Faculty of Science, Prague.
33. Van Liew M.W., Arnold J.G., and Bosh D.D. Problems and potential of autocalibration a hydrologic model. Transactions of the ASAE 48 (2005) 1025-1040
34. Williams J.R., and Berndt H.D. Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology. Transactions of the ASAE 20 (1977) 1100-1104
35. Young R.A., Onstad C.A., Bosch D.D., and Anderson W.P. AGNPS: a nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44 (1989) 168-173