Aortic Stenosis: A Fatal Disease With But a Single Cure**Editorials published in the JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions or the American College of Cardiology.

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 127-128

  Carabello, Blase A ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANGINA PECTORIS; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE DURATION; EDITORIAL; HEART FAILURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYNCOPE; TRANSLUMINAL VALVULOPLASTY; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; VASCULAR ACCESS;

AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 41949086106     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2007.12.004     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Ross Jr. J., and Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation 38 (1968) 61-67
2. Schwarz F., Banmann P., Manthey J., et al. The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival. Circulation 66 (1982) 1105-1110
3. Melby S.J., Zierer A., Kaiser S.P., et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: risk factors for early and late mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 83 (2007) 1651-1656
4. Kohl P., Kerzmann A., Honore C., Comte L., and Limet R. Aortic valve surgery in octogenarians: predictive factors for operative and long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 31 (2007) 600-606
5. Salazar E., Torres J., Barragan R., Lopez M., and Lasses L.A. Aortic valve replacement in patients 70 years and older. Clin Cardiol 27 (2004) 565-570
6. Sievers H.H., Thorsten H., Stierle U., et al. A critical reappraisal of the Ross operation: renaissance of the subcoronary implantation technique?. Circulation 114 Suppl (2006) I504-I511
7. Connolly H.M., Oh J.K., Schaff H.V., et al. Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction: result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients. Circulation 101 (2000) 1940-1946
8. Webb J.G. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement will become a common treatment for aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 1 (2008) 122-126
9. Cribier A., Eltchaninoff H., Tron C., Bauer F., and Gerber L. Percutaneous implantation of aortic valve prosthesis in patients with calcific aortic stenosis: technical advances, clinical results and future strategies. J Invasive Cardiol 19 (2006) S88-S96
10. Webb J.G., Pasupati S.J., Humphries K., et al. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116 (2007) 755-763
11. Otto C.M., Mickel M.C., Kennedy J.W., et al. Three-year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty: insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 89 (1994) 642-650
12. Serruys P.W., Unger F., Sousa J.E., et al. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 344 (2001) 1117-1124