Excluding pulmonary embolism with computed tomographic pulmonary angiography or ventilation-perfusion lung scanning [1]

JAMA

Volumn 299, Issue 14, 2008, Pages 1664-

  Mir, Muhammad Ayaz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; LUNG ANGIOGRAPHY; LUNG EMBOLISM; LUNG PERFUSION; LUNG SCINTISCANNING; LUNG VENTILATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; NOTE; RADIOGRAPHY; SCINTISCANNING; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS;

ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PULMONARY EMBOLISM; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 41949084239     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.14.1664-a     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Anderson DR, Kahn SR, Rodger A, et al. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298(23):2743-2753.
2. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(22):2317-2327.
3. Goodman LR, Stein PD, Matta F, et al. CT venography and compression sonography are diagnostically equivalent: data from PIOPED II. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(5):1071-1076.