Minimum cord length that allows spontaneous vaginal delivery

Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 217-219

  LaMonica, Gene E ^a   Wilson, Margaret L ^a   Fullilove, Anne M ^a   Rayburn, William F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dystocia; Failure to progress in labor; Obstetric labor; Umbilical cord; Umbilical cord length

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; PLACENTA LOCALIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPONTANEOUS PLACENTAL DELIVERY; UMBILICAL CORD; UTERINE FUNDUS; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PLACENTA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UMBILICAL CORD; UTERUS;

EID: 41849109901     PISSN: 00247758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Miller ME, Jones MC, Smith DW: Tension: The basis of umbilical cord growth. J Pediatrics 1982;101:844
2. Rayburn WF, Beynen A, Brinkman DL: Umbilical cord length and intrapartum complications. Obstet Gynecol 1981;57:450-452
3. Kaltenbach R: Zu Kurze Nabelschnur. In Lehrbuch der Geburtshilfe. Stuttgart, 1893, p 316
4. Sornes T: Short umbilical cord as a cause of fetal distress. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989;68:609-611
5. Brickner SM: A new symptom in the diagnosis of dystocia due to a short umbilical cord. Am J Obstet Dis Women 1902;45:512-521
6. Howe WG: Two-sided tolerance limits for normal populations: Some improvements. J Am Statistical Assoc 1969;64:610-620