Non-complicated retinal detachment management: Variations in 4 years. Retina 1 project; report 1

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 523-525

  De La Rua E R ^a,b   Pastor, J C ^a,b   Fernandez I ^b   Sanabria, M R ^b,c   Garcia Arumi J ^d   Martinez Castillo V ^d   Coco, R ^b   Manzanas, L ^a   Miranda, I ^e  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO DE VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO RÍO HORTEGA   (Spain)

^d HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI DE BELLVITGE   (Spain)

^e HOSPITAL NUESTRA SEÑORA DE SONSOLES   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINGENCY TABLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSEUDOPHAKIA; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANK SUM TEST; RETINA; RETINA DETACHMENT; RETINA TEAR; SPAIN; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOM; VITRECTOMY;

HUMANS; OPHTHALMOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINAL DETACHMENT; SPAIN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VITRECTOMY;

EID: 41849099635     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.127688     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Saw SM, Gazzard G, Wagle AM, et al. An evidence-based analysis of surgical interventions for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84:606-12.
2. Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H, et al. Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation - report no. 1. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1421-9.
3. Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N, et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR Study): design issues and implications. SPR Study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001;239:567-74.
4. Schwartz SG, Kuhl DP, McPherson AR, et al. Twenty-year follow-up for scleral buckling. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:325-9.
5. Halberstadt M, Chatterjee-Sanz N, Brandenberg L, et al. Primary retinal reattachment surgery: anatomical and functional outcome in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. Eye 2005;19:891-8.
6. Pournaras CJ, Kapetanios AD. Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment: a prospective non-randomized study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2003;13:298-306.
7. Johansson K, Malmsjo M, Ghosh F. Tailored vitrectomy and laser photocoagulation without scleral buckling for all primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1286-91.
8. Martinez-Castillo V, Zapata MA, Boixadera A, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy, laser retinopexy, and aqueous tamponade for pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. In press.
9. Pastor JC, Álvarez A, Martín de Diego I, et al. Características de los desprendimientos de retina regmatógenos que se remiten a un hospital de referencia. Variaciones en 15 años. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 1999;74:569-74.
10. Minihan M, Tanner V, Williamson TH. Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: 20 years of change. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:546-8.
11. Sasaki K, Ideta H, Yonemoto J, et al. Epidemiologic characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Kumamoto, Japan. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995;233:772-6.
12. Polkinghorne PJ, Craig JP. Northern New Zealand Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study: epidemiology and risk factors. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;32:159-63.
13. Fernandez I, Rojas J, Pastor JC, et al. National survey on vitreo-retinal surgery and the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in Spain. Project retina 2. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2006;81:635-40 (in Spanish).
14. Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H, et al. Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation - report no. 1. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1421-9.
15. Brazitikos PD,Androudi S, Christen WG, et al. Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment: a randomized clinical trial. Retina 2005;25:957-64.
16. Weichel ED, Martidis A, Fineman MS, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy-scleral buckle for primary repair of pseudophakic retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2033-40.
17. Arya AV, Emerson JW, Engelbert M, et al. Surgical management of pseudophakic retinal detachments: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1724-33.
18. Rodriguez de la Rua E, Pastor JC, Aragon J, et al. Interaction between surgical procedure for repairing retinal detachment and clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Curr Eye Res 2005;30:147-53.
19. Weichel ED, Martidis A, Fineman MS, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy-scleral buckle for primary repair of pseudophakic retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2033-40.
20. Campo RV, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy without scleral buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1811-5.
21. Martinez-Castillo V, Boixadera A, Verdugo A, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy alone for the management of inferior breaks in pseudophakic retinal detachment without facedown position. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1222-6.