Commentary: A need for unconstrained thinking on foetal growth

International Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 254-255

  Magnus, Per ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC CORRELATION; GROWTH RATE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; LARGE FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; NOTE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; RELATIVE; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; THINKING;

ANIMALS; BIRTH WEIGHT; BREEDING; FEMALE; FETAL DEVELOPMENT; GENOME; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MOTHERS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 41849098892     PISSN: 03005771     EISSN: 14643685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyn026     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Barker DJP. The developmental origins of chronic adult disease. Acta Pædiatr Suppl 2004;446:26-33.
2. Ounsted M, Scott A, Ounsted C. Transmission through the female line of a mechanism constraining human fetal growth. Ann Hum Biol 1986;13 143-51. Reprinted Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:245-50.
3. Ounsted M. Transmission through the female line of fetal growth constraint (letter to the editor). Early Hum Develop 1986;13 339-41.
4. Leon DA. Biological theories, evidence, and epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:1167-71.
5. Magnus P, Berg K, Bjerkedal T. Reply to M. Ounsted, in Ounsted M. Transmission through the female line of fetal growth constraint (letter to the editor). Early Hum Develop 1986;13:339-41.