Application of fuzzy set theory in the selection of underground mining method

Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 73-79

  Karadogan, A ^a   Kahriman, A ^a   Ozer, U ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Decision making; Fuzzy set theory; Method selection; Mining; Underground

Indexed keywords

FUZZY SET THEORY; MINE PLANNING ENGINEERS; UNCERTAIN DATA;

DATA REDUCTION; DECISION MAKING; FUZZY SETS; LIGNITE MINES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; UNDERGROUND MINE TRANSPORTATION;

MINING ENGINEERING;

EID: 41849086280     PISSN: 22256253     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. KAHRIMAN, A., CEYLANOǦLU, A., DEMIRCI, A., ARPAZ, E., and UYSAL, Ö. Optimum underground mining method selection for Kayseri-Pulpinar Chrome Mine, Mining Review, TMMOB Chamber of The Mining Engineers, Ankara, 1994. pp. 27-41.
2. DEMIRCI, A., CEYLANOǦLU, A., and KAHRIMAN, A. Determination of optimum underground mining method at Aegean Metal Eskisehir Chrome Enterprise and Projected Studies, Final Report, Cumhuriyet Universiy, Sivas, 1995.
3. NICHOLAS, D.E. Selection variables, Mining Engineering Handbook, vol. 2, 1993. pp. 2051-2057.
4. HAMRIN, H. Choosing an underground mining method, Techniques in Underground Mining, Society of Mining Metallurgy and Exploration Inc., Littleton, CO, USA, 1998. pp. 45-85.
5. BASCETIN, A. A decision support system using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open pit mine, Environmental Geology, vol. 52, no. 4, April, 2007, pp. 663-672.
6. BASCETIN, A., ÖZTAŞ, A., and KANLI, A. EQS: A Computer Software Using Fuzzy Logic for Equipment Selection in Mining Engineering, The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM), vol. 106. no. 1, January, 2006.
7. BAŞÇETIN, A. An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Equipment Selection at Orhaneli Open Pit Coal Mine. Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM), Section A-Mining Technology, vol. 113, no. 3, September, 2004.
8. ZADEH, L.A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Part 1, Information Science, vol. 813, 1975. pp. 199-249.
9. GOKAY, M.K. Used of the fuzzy logic approach on rock mass classification, Mining Review, TMMOB Chamber of The Mining Engineers, Ankara, 1998. pp. 3-11.
10. KARADOGAN, A., BASCETIN, A., KAHRIMAN, A., and GORGUN, S. A new approach in selection of underground mining method, Int. Conf. Modern Management Mine Producing Geol Env. Protection, Varna, Bulgaria, June 3-9, 2001. pp.171-183.
11. BASCETIN, A. and KESIMAL, A. Fuzzy logic application in mining, Engineering Faculty's Earth Sciences Review, vol. 12, no. 1, 1999.
12. ALBAYRAK, C. and ALBAYRAK, E. Selection of rigth associate on strategical cooperation: suggestion a decision support model, 1th National Production Researchs Sym., Istanbul, 1997. pp. 19-22.
13. YAGER, R.R. A new methodology for ordinal multi objective decisions based on fuzzy sets, Decision Sci. 12, 1981. pp. 589-600.
14. SAATY, T.L. Exploring the interface between hierarchies, multiple objectives and fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 1978. pp. 57-68.
15. Matlab, The Mathworks, Inc., version 5.0.0.4069, copyright 1984-1996.