Examining state dependence and place attachment within a recreational fishing site choice model

Journal of Leisure Research

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 110-127

  Hunt, Len M ^a  

^a ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavior; Choice model; Place attachment; Recreational fishing; State dependence

Indexed keywords

ANGLING; FISHING; MODELING; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; SITE FIDELITY;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

EID: 41749112450     PISSN: 00222216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2008.11950135     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ben-Akiva, M. E., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bolduc, D., Fortin, B., & Gordon, S. (1997). Multinomial probit estimation of spatially interdependent choices: an empirical comparison of two new techniques. International Regional Science Review, 20, 77-101.
3. Boxall, P. C., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2002). Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23, 421-446.
4. Bricker, K., & Kerstetter, D. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences, 22, 233-257.
5. Davenport, M. A., & Anderson, D. H. (2005). Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Society & Natural Resources, 18, 625-643.
6. Grijalva, T. C., Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., Jakus, P. M., & Shaw, W. D. (2004). Valuing the loss of rock climbing access in wilderness areas: A national level random utility model. Land Economics, 78, 103-120.
7. Hagerty, D., & Moeltner, K (2005). Specification of driving costs in models of recreation demand. Land Economics, 81, 127-143.
8. Hailu, G., Boxall, P. C., & McFarlane, B. L. (2005). The influence of place attachment on recreation demand. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 581-598.
9. Hammit, W. E., Baklund, E. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2004). Experience use history, place bonding and resource substitution of trout anglers during recreation engagements. Journal of Leisure Research, 36, 356-378.
10. Heckman, J. J. (1981). Statistical models for discrete panel data. In C. F. Manski & D. McFadden (Eds.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications (pp. 114-175). Cambidge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Herriges, J. A., & Phaneuf, D. J. (2002). Inducing patterns of correlation and substitution in repeated logit models of recreation demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 1076-1090.
12. Hunt, L. M. (2005). Choice models and recreational fishing site choice: Insights and future opportunities. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10, 153-172.
13. Hunt, L. M. (2006). Modeling relationships between road access and recreational fishing site choice while accounting for spatial complexities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON.
14. Kaltenborn, B. P. (1997). Nature of place attachment: A study among recreation homeowners in southern Norway. Leisure Sciences, 19, 175-189.
15. Kyle, G., Bricker, K., Graefe, A., & Wickham, T. (2004). An examination of recreationists' relationships with activities and settings. Leisure Sciences, 26, 123-142.
16. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2005). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment and Behavior, 37, 153-177.
17. Meyer, R. J. (1980). A descriptive model of constrained residential search. Geographical Analysis, 12, 21-32.
18. Moeltner, K., & Englin, J. (2004). Choice behavior under dynamic quality changes: State dependence versus "play-it-by-ear" in selecting ski resorts. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 22, 214-224.
19. Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16, 17-31.
20. Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 263-276.
21. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
22. Provencher, W., Barenklau, K. A., & Bishop, R. C. (2002). A finite mixture logit model of recreational angling with serially correlated random utility. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 1066-1075.
23. Shaw, W. D., & Ozog, M. T. (1999). Modeling overnight recreation trip choice: application of a repeated nested multinomial logit model. Environment and Resource Economics, 13, 397-414.
24. Shelby, B., & Vaske, J. J. (1991). Resource and activity substitutes for recreational salmon fishing in New Zealand. Leisure Sciences, 13, 21-32.
25. Siderelis, C., & Attarian, A. (2004). Trip response modeling of rock climbers' reactions to proposed regulations. Journal of Leisure Research, 36, 73-88.
26. Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34, 561-581.
27. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People and places: A transactional view of settings. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior and the environment (pp. 441-488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Swait, J. F., Adamowicz, W. L., & van Bueren, M. (2004). Choice and temporal welfare impacts: Incorporating history into discrete choice models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47, 94-116.
29. Train, K. E. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Williams, D. R., Anderson, B. S., McDonald, C. D., & Patterson, M. E. (1995). Measuring place attachment: More preliminary results. In V. Freysinger, & P. Stokowski (Eds.), Abstracts - 1995 Symposium on Leisure Research (p. 78). Arlington, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.