Immunological evaluation of the intestinal mucosa of broiler chicks treated with Lactobacillus spp. and challenged with Salmonella enteritidis

Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola / Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 259-262

  Okamoto, Adriano Sakai ^a,c   Andreatti Filho, R L ^b   Lima, E T ^a   Pereira, R E P ^a   Menconi, A ^a   Rocha, T S ^a   Marietto Goncalves G A ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science   (Brazil)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Chicks; IgA; Lactobacillus; Salmonella

Indexed keywords

LACTOBACILLUS; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS;

EID: 41749107954     PISSN: 1516635X     EISSN: 18069061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-635X2007000400009     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andreatti Filho RL, Silva EM, Curi PR. Ácidos orgânicos e microbiota cecal anaeróbia no controle da infection experimental de frangos por SalmonellaTyphimurium e Salmonella Enteritidis. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 1997; 49:661-672.
2. Arechederra TM, Cayón D. Probióticos, algo mas que bacteria. uma era funcional. Revista Enfasis Argentina 2000; 6(5). [acesso em: 03 jun. 2002]. Disponível em: http://www.enfasis.com/ar alim/200005/NOTA.html
3. Doherty L. et al. An outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 in a rural community in Norther Ireland. Communicable Disease Report Review 1997; 7:73-76.
4. Elia C, Souza H. Imunologia da intestinal mucosa. [acesso em: 04 jun. 2002]. Disponível em: http://orbita.starmedia.com/~dia-adiagastro/ entrevistas_base.html.
5. th ed. New York: Elsevier Science; 1986. p.181-245.
6. o Congresso Brasileiro de Microbiologia; 1995; Santos. p.103.
7. th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1997. p.81-121.
8. Gusils C, Gonzalez SN, Oliver G. Some probiotic properties of chicken Lactobacilli. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 1999; 45:981-987.
9. Hassan JO et al. Detection of Salmonella typhimurium infection of chickens by indirect ELISA. Veterinary Record 1990; 126:519-522.
10. Lopes Filho O, Migaça I. Imunologia do anel linfático de Waldeyer. In: Lopes Filho O, Campos CAH. Treated de otorrinolaringologia. São Paulo: Roca; 1994. p. 148-162.
11. Maassen CBM. et al. Strain-dependent induction of cytokine profiles in the gut by orally administered Lactobacillus strains. Vaccine 2000; 18:2613-2623.
12. Nagy IK, Bogal BS, Mackenzie T. Duration of anti-adhesive and bactericidal activities of milk from vaccinated sows on Escherichia coli O149 in the digestive tract of piglets during the nursing period. Research in Veterinary Science 1979; 27:289-296.
13. Noronha IL. et al. Nefropatia mesangial primária de IgA : aspectos clínicos e imunopatológicos. Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia 1995; 17(1):21-29.
14. Perdigón G, Alvarez S, Pesce De Ruiz Holgado A. Immunoadjuvant activity of oral bactobacillus casei: influence of dose on the secretory immune response and protective capacity in intestinal infections. Journal of Dairy Research 1991; 58(4):485-496.
15. Schiffrin E. Los probioticos en la alimentación infantil. Reunión Sobre Probióticos; 1999; Madrid. Madrid.
16. Snoeyenbos GH. et al. Large-scale trials to study competitive exclusion of Salmonella in chickens. Avian Diseases 1985; 29:1004-1011.
17. Wold A, Hanson LA. Defense factors in human milk. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 1994; 10:652-658.
18. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1996.