Biobanking human biological materials: Issues surrounding the collection of samples for use in future research

Pharmaceutical Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 75-84

  Kapp, Marshall B ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics; Informed consent; Legislation; Regulatory process; Research and development

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL;

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 41749101943     PISSN: 11782595     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03256687     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Adams M, Prentice ED, Oki GSF. Ethical considerations in informed consent for potential future use of human tissue samples. IRB 1996 Mar-Apr; 18 (2): 6-7
2. Häyry M, Chadwick R, Árnason V, et al. The ethics and governance of human genetic databases: European perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007
3. Bregman-Eschet Y. Genetic databases and biobanks: who controls our genetic privacy? Santa Clara Comput High Tech Law J 2006 Nov; 23 (1): 1-54
4. Gibbons SMV, Kaye J, Smart A, et al. Governing genetic databases: challenges facing research regulation and practice. J Law Soc 2007 Jun; 34 (2): 163-89
5. Roche PA, Annas GJ. DNA testing, banking, and genetic privacy. N Engl J Med 2006 Aug 10; 355 (6): 545-6
6. Terry SF, Terry PF. A consumer perspective on forensic DNA banking. J Law Med Ethics 2006 Sum; 34 (2): 408-14
7. Meslin EM, Quaid KA. Ethical issues in the collection, storage, and research use of human biological materials. J Lab Clin Med 2004 Nov; 144 (5): 229-34
8. Andrews LB. Harnessing the benefits of biobanks. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 22-30
9. Rothstein MA, Knoppers BM. Introduction. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 6
10. Wendler D. What research with stored samples teaches us about research with human subjects. Bioethics 2002 Feb; 16 (1): 33-54
11. Malinowski MJ. Taking genomics to the biobank: access to human biological samples and medical information. LA Law Rev 2005 Dec; 66 (1): 43-67
12. Chalmers D. Research involving humans: a time for change? J Law Med Ethics 2004 Win; 32 (4): 583-95
13. Naser C, Alpert S. Genetic information, ethics, ethical issues in tissue banking and human subject research in stored tissues. In: Murray TH, Mehlman MJ, editors. Encyclopedia of ethical, legal, and policy issues in biotechnology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000: 363-9
14. Witte C. Cord blood storage: property and liability issues. J Leg Med 2005 Jun; 26 (2): 275-92
15. Rothstein MA. Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 89-101
16. Bauer K, Taub S, Parsi K. Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: a brief review of existing organizational policies. Theor Med 2004 Apr; 25 (2): 113-42
17. Knoppers BM. Biobanking: international norms. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 7-14
18. Weir RF, Olick RS. The stored tissue issue: biomedical research, ethics, and law in the era of genomic medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004: 145
19. National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e35syn.htm [Accessed 2008 Feb 20]
20. Essentially yours: the protection of human genetic information in Australia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.alrc.gov.au/inquiries/title/ alrc96/index.htm [Accessed 2008 Feb 20]
21. Gassner UM. Legal aspects of tissue banking. Pathobiology 2007; 74 (4): 270-4
22. Rothstein MA. The role of IRBs in research involving commercial biobanks. J Law Med Ethics 2002 Spr; 30 (1): 105-8
23. Winickoff DE, Winickoff RN. The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. N Engl J Med 2003 Sep 18; 349 (12): 1180-4
24. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research involving human biological materials: issues and policy guidance. Rockville (MD): 1999 Aug [online]. Available from URL: http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/pubs.html [Accessed 2007 Feb 20]
25. Gibbs JN. State regulation of pharmaceutical clinical trials. Food Drug Law J 2004; 59 (2): 265-85
26. Morreim EH. Litigation in clinical research: malpractice doctrines versus research realities. J Law Med Ethics 2004 Fall; 32 (3): 474-84
27. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Research Protection. Guidance on research involving coded private information or biological specimens. 2004 Aug [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/cdebiol.pdf [Accessed 2007 Feb 20]
28. Clayton EW. So what are we going to do about research using clinical information and samples? IRB 2004 Nov/Dec; 26 (6): 14-5
29. Clayton EW. Patients and biobanks. Villanova Law Rev 2006; 51 (4): 793-802
30. Evans BJ, Meslin EM. Encouraging translational research through harmonization of FDA and Common Rule informed consent requirements for research with banked specimens. J Leg Med 2006 Jun; 27 (2): 119-66
31. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health and Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research. Guidance for sponsors, institutional review boards, clinical investigators and FDA staff: guidance on informed consent for in vitro diagnostic device studies using leftover human specimens that are not individually identified. Fed Reg 2006 Apr 25; 71 (79): 23924-5 [online]. Available from URL: http://crpac.od.nih.gov/ FinalFDAGuidanceonICforIVDDeviceStudieswithLeftoverSpecimensthatAreNot IndividuallyIdentifiable.pdf [Accessed 2007 Feb 20]
32. Deschênes M, Sallée C. Accountability in population biobanking: comparative approaches. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 40-53
33. McHale J, Habiba M, Dixon-Woods M, et al. Consent for childhood cancer tissue banking in the UK: the effect of the Human Tissue Act of 2004. Lancet Oncol 2007 Mar; 8 (3): 266-72
34. Sade RM. Research on stored biological samples is still research. Arch Intern Med 2002 Jul 8; 162 (13): 1439-40
35. Prime W, Sobel ME, Herrington CS. Utilization of human tissue in breast cancer research. Breast Cancer Res 2000 Apr; 2 (4): 237-40
36. Liddell K, Hall A. Beyond Bristol and Alder Hey: the future regulation of human tissue. Med Law Rev 2005 Sum; 13: 170-223
37. Najmabadi H, Neishabury M, Sahebjam F, et al. The Iranian Human Mutation Gene Bank: a data and sample resource for worldwide collaborative genetics research. Hum Mutat 2003 Feb; 21 (2): 146-50
38. Merz JF, Leonard DGB, Miller ER. IRB review and consent in human tissue research. Science 1999 Mar 12; 283: 1647-8
39. White MT, Gamm J. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices. Account Res 2002 Jan; 9 (1): 1-16
40. Strouse DS. Informed consent to genetic research on banked human tissue. Jurimetrics J 2005 Win; 45: 135-52
41. Furness P. Consent to using human tissue. BMJ 2003 Oct 4; 327: 759-60
42. Cassell J, Young A. Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research. J Med Ethics 2002 Oct; 28 (5): 313-7
43. Greely HT. Breaking the stalemate: a prospective regulatory framework for unforeseen research uses of human tissue samples and health information. Wake Forest Law Rev 1999 Fall; 34 (3): 737-66
44. Caulfield T. Tissue banking, patient rights, and confidentiality: tensions in law and policy. Med Law 2004; 23 (1): 39-49
45. Malinowski MJ. Technology transfer in biobanking: credits, debits, and population health futures. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 54-69
46. Clayton EW. Informed consent and biobanks. J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 15-21
47. Volk Jr MD, McAuliffe CM, Mowzoon M. Genebank management: a review of salient ethical, legal, and social issues. Jurimetrics J 2005 Win; 45 (2): 205-23
48. Furness PN. The Human Tissue Act: reassurance for relatives, at a price. BMJ 2006 Sep 9; 333: 512
49. Effective implementation of the Human Tissue Act [editorial]. Lancet 2006 Sep 9; 368: 891
50. Ironside J. Effective implementation of the Human Tissue Act [letter]. Lancet 2006 Nov 11; 368: 1648-9
51. Korobkin R. Autonomy and informed consent in nontherapeutic biomedical research. UCLA Law Rev 2007 Feb; 54: 605-30
52. US Department of Health & Human Services. OCR privacy brief: summary of the HIPAA privacy rule [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/ privacysummary.pdf [Accessed 2008 Feb 20]
53. US Department of Health and Human Services. Research repositories, databases, and the HIPAA privacy rule. Posted 2004 Jan 12 [online]. Available from URL: http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/research_repositories.asp [Accessed 2008 Feb 20]
54. Allen MD. Commercial tissue repositories: HIPAA raises sponsor's fears. IRB 2004 Sep/Oct; 26 (5): 9-11
55. Palmer LI. Should liability play a role in social control of biobanks? J Law Med Ethics 2005 Spr; 33 (1): 70-8
56. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Safeguards in the use of DNA databanks in genomic research. In: Code of medical ethics: current opinions with annotations. Chicago (IL): American Medical Association, 2007
57. Wiwanitkit V. Ethical concerns on the use of laboratory waste. J Med Assoc Thai 2007 Jun; 90 (6): 1259-60
58. Nilstun T, Hermerén G. Human tissue samples and ethics. Med Health Care Philos 2006 Mar; 9 (1): 81-6
59. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, et al. Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: a population-based study. Scand J Public Health 2007; 35 (2): 148
60. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, et al. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks: what do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Eur J Public Health 2006 Aug; 16 (4): 433-40
61. Kaphingst KA, Janoff JM, Harris LN, et al. Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research. Clin Genet 2006 May; 69 (5): 393-8
62. Andrews L. Who owns your body? A patient's perspective on Washington University v. Catalona. J Law Med Ethics 2006 Sum; 34 (2): 398-407
63. Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hosp. Research Inst., Inc., 264 F. Supp.2d 1064 (S.D. Fla. 2003)
64. Moore v. Regents of the Univ. Of Cal., 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990)
65. Gitter DM. Ownership of human tissue: a proposal for federal recognition of human research participants' property rights in their biological material. WA Lee Law Rev 2004 Win; 61 (1): 257-345
66. Charo RA. Body of research: ownership and use of human tissue. N Engl J Med 2006 Oct 12; 355 (15): 1517-9
67. Washington University v. Catalona, 490 F.3d 667, 2007 WL 1758268 (C.A. 8)
68. Gamber G. Who owns my donated tissue? The public's prostate inflammation: a case note on Washington University v. Catalona. St Louis U Pub L Rev 2007; 26: 357-87
69. Glantz L, Roche P, Annas GJ. Rules for donations to tissue banks: what next? N Engl J Med 2008 Jan 17; 358 (3): 298-300
70. Oberdorfer KLJ. The lessons of Greenberg: informed consent and the protection of tissue sources' research interests. Georgetown Law J 2004 Nov; 93 (1): 365-94
71. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Commercial use of human tissue. In: Code of medical ethics: current opinions with annotations. Chicago (IL): American Medical Association, 2007
72. Asai A, Ohnishi M, Nishigaki E, et al. Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: Preliminary findings based on focus group interviews. BMC Med Ethics 2002 Jan 2; 3: 1-10