Magnetic-guided percutaneous coronary intervention enabled by two-dimensional guidewire steering and three-dimensional virtual angioscopy: Initial experiences in daily clinical practice

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 158-166

  Schneider, Michael A E ^a,b   Hoch, Franz V ^a   Neuser, Hans ^a   Brunn, Jürgen ^a   Koller, Marcus L ^a   Gietzen, Frank ^a   Schamberger, Rainer ^a   Kerber, Sebastian ^a   Schumacher, Burghard ^a  

^a Center of Cardiovascular Medicine   (Germany)

^b Cardiovascular Clinic Bad Neustadt   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOSCOPY; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DEFIBRILLATOR; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; ANGIOSCOPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 41749096788     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00327.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cole PL, Krone RJ. PTCA update: Is your patient now a candidate? Even complex multivessel lesions may succumb to balloon dilation. J Crit Illn 1991 6 : 166 188.
2. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Pache J, et al. Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. New Engl J Med 2007 356 : 1030 1039.
3. Hofmann M, Storger H, Schwarz F, et al. Percutaneous saphenous vein graft interventions with and without distal filter wire protection. J Interv Cardiol 2005 18 : 475 479.
4. Vermeersch P, Agostoni P. Should degenerated saphenous vein grafts routinely be sealed with drug-eluting stents? J Interv Cardiol 2005 18 : 467 473.
5. Tsuchida K, Garcia-Garcia HM, van der Giessen WJ, et al. Guidewire navigation in coronary artery stenoses using a novel magnetic navigation system: First clinical experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006 67 : 356 363.
6. Krings T, Finney J, Niggemann P, et al. Magnetic versus manual guidewire manipulation in neuroradiology: In vitro results. Neuroradiology 2006 48 : 394 401.
7. Atmakuri SR, Lev EI, Alviar C, et al. Initial experience with a magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 47 : 515 521.
8. Dietrich T, Kleen M, Killmann R, et al. Evaluation of magnetic navigation in an in vitro model of uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004 15 : 1457 1462.
9. Nikolsky E, Halabi M, Roguin A, et al. Staged versus one-step approach for multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions. Am Heart J 2002 143 : 1017 1026.
10. Zahn R, Hamm CW, Schneider S, et al. Incidence and predictors of target vessel revascularization and clinical event rates of the sirolimus-eluting coronary stent (results from the prospective multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry). Am J Cardiol 2005 95 : 1302 1308.
11. Kolb C, Deisenhofer I, Weyerbrock S, et al. Incidence of antitachycardia therapy suspension due to magnet reversion in implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004 27 : 221 223.
12. Roguin A, Donahue JK, Bomma CS, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 : 336 338.
13. Roguin A, Zviman MM, Meininger GR, et al. Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: In vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T. Circulation 2004 110 : 475 482.
14. KDOQI Clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2007 49 (Suppl. 2 S12 154.
15. Ramcharitar S, Patterson MS, van Geuns RJ, et al. A randomised controlled study comparing conventional and magnetic guidewires in a two-dimensional branching tortuous phantom simulating angulated coronary vessels. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007. EPub ahead of print.
16. Gollapudi RR, Valencia R, Lee SS, et al. Utility of three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007 69 : 479 482.
17. Gradaus R, Mathies K, Breithardt G, et al. Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: Evaluation in stented vessel segments. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006 68 : 44 49.
18. Schlundt C, Kreft JG, Fuchs F, et al. Three-dimensional on-line reconstruction of coronary bifurcated lesions to optimize side-branch stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006 68 : 249 253.
19. Patterson MS, Schotten J, van Mieghem C, et al. Magnetic navigation in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Interv Cardiol 2006 19 : 558 565.
20. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel angioplasty prognosis study group. Circulation 1990 82 : 1193 1202.
21. Myler RK, Shaw RE, Stertzer SH, et al. Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: Current experience and analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992 19 : 1641 1652.
22. Golombeck MA, Dossel O. MR-tomography on patients with heart pacemakers - A numerical study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004 2 : 1076 1079.
23. Jones SL. Electromagnetic field interference and cardiac pacemakers. Phys Ther 1976 56 : 1013 1018.
24. Shellock FG, Fieno DS, Thomson LJ, et al. Cardiac pacemaker: In vitro assessment at 1.5 T. Am Heart J 2006 151 : 436 443.
25. Klein LW. Coronary complications of percutaneous coronary intervention: A practical approach to the management of abrupt closure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005 64 : 395 401.