Mangafodipir-DPDP enhanced MRI visualization of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously undetected by extracellular contrast enhanced CT and MRI

Acta Biomedica de l'Ateneo Parmense

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 225-228

  De Filippo, Massimo ^a,b   Bocchi, Carlo ^a   Quartieri, Leonardo ^a   Corradi, Domenico ^a   Zompatori, Maurizio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Contrast enhanced CT; Mangafodipir DPDP enhanced MRI; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Indexed keywords

MANGAFODIPIR; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DRUG DERIVATIVE; EDETIC ACID; N,N' BIS(PYRIDOXAL 5 PHOSPHATE)ETHYLENEDIAMINE N,N' DIACETIC ACID; N,N'-BIS(PYRIDOXAL-5-PHOSPHATE)ETHYLENEDIAMINE-N,N'-DIACETIC ACID; PYRIDOXAL 5 PHOSPHATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CANCER STAGING; CASE REPORT; COMMON BILE DUCT STENOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ADENOCARCINOMA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CONTRAST MEDIA; EDETIC ACID; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PYRIDOXAL PHOSPHATE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 41749090934     PISSN: 03924203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Michaud DS. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. Minerva Chir 2004; 59(2): 99-111.
2. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Mueller PR, Saini S. State-of-the-art imaging of pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Radiol 2003; 76 (912): 857-65. Review.
3. Del Frate C, Zanardi R, Mortele K, Ros PR. Advances in imaging for pancreatic disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2002; 4 (2): 140-8. Review.
4. Bronstein YL, Loyer EM, Kaur H, et al. Detection of small pancreatic tumors with multiphasic helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (3): 619-23.
5. Sheridan MB, Ward J, Guthrie JA, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173 (3): 583-90.
6. Kahl S., Malferheiner P. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of patients with solid pancreatic masses. Dig Dis 2004; 22: 26-31.
7. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz E, Lozano-Leon A, e al. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 289-93.
8. Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Frequency of major complication after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 622-9.