Quasi-2D approach in modeling the transport of contaminated sediments in floodplains during river flooding - Model coupling and uncertainty analysis

Environmental Engineering Science

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 333-351

  Lindenschmidt, Karl Erich ^a  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Flood; Monte Carlo analysis; Quasi 2D hydrodynamic modeling; Saale River uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINATION; FLOODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RIVERS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY;

COMPUTATIONAL RESOURCES; SAALE RIVER UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

SEDIMENT TRANSPORT;

ZINC;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FLOODING; FLOODPLAIN; GERMANY; HYDRODYNAMICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; RIVER; SEDIMENT; SIMULATION; WATER FLOW; WATER QUALITY; WATER TRANSPORT;

EID: 41649120745     PISSN: 10928758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2006.0192     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. AMBROSE, R.B., WOOL, T.A., and MARTIN, J.L. (1993). The Water Quality Simulation Program, WASP5: Model Theory, User's Manual, and Programmer's Guide. Athens, GA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (http://www.epa.gov/ ceampubl/swater/wasp/).
2. ASSELMAN, N.E.M., and VAN WIJNGAARDEN, M. (2002). Development and application of a 1D floodplain sedimentation model for the River Rhine in the Netherlands. J. Hydrol. 268, 127.
3. AURELI, A., MARANZONI, A., MIGNOSA, P., and ZIVERI, C. (2006). Flood hazard mapping by means of fully-2D and quasi-2D numerical modeling: a case study. In: J. van Alphen, E. van Beek, and M. Taal, Eds., Floods, from Defence to Management, 3rd International Symposium on Flood Defence, Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Taylor & Francis/Balkema, p. 373.
4. BRUGNACH, M., and PAHL-WOSTL, C. (2008). Complexity and uncertainty and a new role for models. Environ. Model. Software. (submitted).
5. BÜTTNER, O., OTTE-WITTE, K., KRÜGER, F., MEON, G., and RODE, M. (2006). Numerical modelling of floodplain hydraulics and suspended sediment transport and deposition at the event scale in the middle river Elbe, Germany. Acta Hydrochim. Hyrobiol. 34, 265.
6. CUNGE, J.A. (1975). Two-dimensional modeling of floodplains. In: K. Mahood and V. Yevjevich, Eds., Unsteady Flow in Open Channels, Vol. 2. Ft. Collins, CO: Water Resources Publications, p. 705.
7. DHI. (1992). MIKE 11 User Manual. Denmark: Danish Hydraulic Institute.
8. HARDY, R.J., BATES, P.D., and ANDERSON, M.G. (2000). Modelling suspended sediment deposition on a fluvial floodplain using a two-dimensional dynamic finite element model. J. Hydrol. 229, 202.
9. HERSCHY, R.W. (1995). Streamflow Measurement, 2nd ed. London: E & FN Spon, an imprint of Chapman and Hall.
10. HERVOUET, J.-M. (2000). TELMAC modelling system: An overview. Hydrol. Process. 14, 2209.
11. HUANG, S., VOROGUSHYN, S., and LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E. (2007). Quasi 2D hydrodynamic modelling of the flooded hinterland due to dyke breaching on the Elbe River. Adv. Geosci. (http://www.adv-geosci.net/11/21/2007/adgeo-11- 21-2007.html).
12. HUANG, S., RAUBERG, J., APEL, H., and LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E. (2008). The effectiveness of polder systems on peak discharge capping of floods along the middle reaches of the Elbe River in Germany. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. (accepted).
13. HORRITT, M.S., and BATES, P.D. (2002). Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J. Hydrol. 268, 87.
14. KRONE, R.B. (1962). Flume Studies of the Transport of Sediment in Estuarial Shoaling Processes. Berkeley, CA: Hydraulic Engineering and Sanitary Engineering Research Laboratory. University of California.
15. KUHL, F., WEATHERLY, R., and DAHMANN, J. (1999). Creating Computer Simulation Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E. (2006a). The effect of complexity on parameter sensitivity and model uncertainty in river water quality modelling. Ecol. Model. 190(1-2), 72.
17. LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E. (2006b). Testing for the transferability of a water quality model to areas of similar spatial and temporal scale based on an uncertainty vs. complexity hypothesis. Ecol. Complexity 3(3), 241.
18. LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E. (2006c). River water quality modelling for river basin and water resources management with a focus on the Saale River, Germany. Habilitation thesis from the Brandenburg Technical University of Cottbus, Germany (http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/bib/pub/digi/lindenschmidt.htm)
19. LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E., and RAUBERG, J. (2005). Extension of a one-dimensinal hydrodynamic river model to differentiate the hydraulic characteristics of river channels and inundation areas in flood simulation by means of a branched network and dynamic discretization. Hydrol. Wasserbewirtschaft. 49(6), 288.
20. LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E., POSER, K., and RODE, M. (2005a). Impact of morphological parameters on water quality variables using a computer modelling simulation of a regulated, lowland river. Water Sci. Technol. 52(6), 187.
21. LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E., RAUBERG, J., and HESSER, F. (2005b). Extending uncertainty analysis of a hydrodynamic - Water quality modeling system using High Level Architecture (HLA). Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 40(1), 59.
22. LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E., RAUBERG, J., and HOHMANN, R. (2006a). Stofftransport im Fluss- und Auenbereich bei Hochwasser: Quasi-2D hydrodynamische Simulation und Unsicherheitsanalyse. Gas- Wasserfach: Wasser Abwasser 147(11), 720.
23. LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E., WODRICH, R., and HESSE, C. (2006b). The effects of scaling and model complexity in simulating the transport of inorganic micro-pollutants in a lowland river reach. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 41(1), 24.
24. LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E., HUANG, S., and BABOROWSKI, M. (2008). A quasi-2D flood modelling approach to simulate substance transport in polder systems for environmental flood risk assessment. Hydrol. Process. (submitted).
25. MIDDELKOOP, H., and VAN DER PERK, M. (1998). Modelling spatial patterns of overbank sedimentation on embanked floodplains. Geografiska Ann. 80(A), 95.
26. NICHOLAS, A.P., and MITCHELL, C.A. (2003). Numerical simulation of overbank processes in topographically complex floodplain environments. Hydrol. Process. 17, 727.
27. NICHOLAS, A.P., and WALLING, D.E. (1997). Modelling flood hydraulics and overbank deposition on river floodplains. Earth Surfaces Landforms 22, 59.
28. NICHOLAS, A.P., and WALLING, D.E. (1998). Numerical modelling and floodplain hydraulics and suspended sediment transport and deposition. Hydrol. Process. 12, 1339.
29. NICHOLAS, A.P., WALLING, D.E., SWEET, R.J., and FANG, X. (2006). Development and evaluation of a new catchmentscale model of floodplain sedimentation. Water Resources Res. 42, W10426.
30. SIGGER, G.B., BATES, P.D., ANDERSON, M.G., WALLING, D.E., and HE, Q. (1999). A preliminary investigation of the integration of modelled floodplain hydraulics with estimates of overbank floodplain sedimentation derived from Pb-210 and Cs-137 measurements. Earth Surface Process. Landforms 24, 211.
31. UHLMANN, H.-W. (2001). Hochwasserschutzkonzeption im Flußgebiet der Saale - Grundlage nicht nur für die Ausweisung von Ü berschwemmungsgebieten und Deich(rück)bau. Nova Acta Leopoldinad NF 84(319), 165.
32. VON SALESKI, M., WARWICK, J.J., HOHMANN, R., and LINDENSCHMIDT, K.-E. (2004). Parameterunsicherheit eines hydrodynamischen Flussmodells mit Wehren. Gas- Wasserfach-Wasser/Abwasser 145(5), 310.